On Wed, Dec 02, 1998, Paul Wolstenholme wrote:
> I just checked the CVS port branch at the FreeBSD site and the last
> version there is 2.0.15. I was wondering if someone knew if this
> was going to be upgraded to the 2.1 branch in the near future.
I had still no time for this, but I'm now w
I just checked the CVS port branch at the FreeBSD site and the last
version there is 2.0.15. I was wondering if someone knew if this
was going to be upgraded to the 2.1 branch in the near future.
/Paul
On Mon, 30 Nov 1998, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
>
> Sorry for the delay, but a lot of s
On Mon, Nov 30, 1998, Manuel J. Galan wrote:
> "Ralf S. Engelschall" wrote:
> [...]
> >*) Ported a recent change in Apache-SSL 1.29 to mod_ssl:
> > ``Send CA list to client when SSLCACertificatePath is used (this was
> > only done for SSLCACertificateFile up to now)''. I've implem
On Mon, Nov 30, 1998, Tom Vaughan wrote:
> > Sorry for the delay, but a lot of stuff from my "development queue" had to be
> > incorporated and tested. But now here it is: mod_ssl 2.1.1, the first bugfix
> > release for the 2.1 branch. [...snip...]
>
> Does this mean that the 2.0.x branch is dea
"Ralf S. Engelschall" wrote:
[...]
>*) Ported a recent change in Apache-SSL 1.29 to mod_ssl:
> ``Send CA list to client when SSLCACertificatePath is used (this was
> only done for SSLCACertificateFile up to now)''. I've implemented it
> with a new ssl_init_FindCAList() functi
> Sorry for the delay, but a lot of stuff from my "development queue" had to be
> incorporated and tested. But now here it is: mod_ssl 2.1.1, the first bugfix
> release for the 2.1 branch. [...snip...]
Does this mean that the 2.0.x branch is dead? That is, do you plan on
maintaining two branches;
Sorry for the delay, but a lot of stuff from my "development queue" had to be
incorporated and tested. But now here it is: mod_ssl 2.1.1, the first bugfix
release for the 2.1 branch. The major user visible changes: First network I/O
performance is no longer decreased (we no longer force NO_WRITEV