On Fri, Dec 18, 1998, Magnus Stenman wrote:
> [...various hints...]
Thanks for the various hints on the Wassenaar state.
I'll now include the following entry in the mod_ssl FAQ:
| First, let us explain what Wassenaar and it's Arrangement on
| Export Controls for Conventional Arms and Dual-Use
look at the GnuPG home page:
http://www.d.shuttle.de/isil/gnupg/gsn.html
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 18, 1998, Michael Salmon wrote:
>
> >[...]
> > The Wassenaar agreement has it's own definition of PD that is more in
> > line with the common view than the legal view.
>
> Oh, in
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 18, 1998, Michael Salmon wrote:
>
> >[...]
> > The Wassenaar agreement has it's own definition of PD that is more in
> > line with the common view than the legal view.
>
> Oh, interesting. And where is this definition written down? Any URLs at hand?
>
You might want to look at
http://www.fitug.de/news/wa/index.html
which is a html conversion of the documents at www.wassenaar.org
"Ralf S. Engelschall" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 18, 1998, Michael Salmon wrote:
>
> >[...]
> > The Wassenaar agreement has it's own definition of PD that is more in
>
On Fri, Dec 18, 1998, Michael Salmon wrote:
>[...]
> The Wassenaar agreement has it's own definition of PD that is more in
> line with the common view than the legal view.
Oh, interesting. And where is this definition written down? Any URLs at hand?
I ask because I want to add information to t
+- On Fri, 18 Dec 1998 12:53:04 +0100, "Ralf S. Engelschall" writes:
|
| I've currently seen the following statement on http://www.gnu.org/home.html:
|
| ``New information regarding the Wassenaar agreement indicates that the
| information we posted here on the 11th of December was a false al
[...]
> Although I've read the Wassenaar agreement stuff last week, I've only
> recognized that they talk about "software in the public domain". And that
> can
> be interpreted differently, i.e. PD software is free software, but not all
> types of free software is PD. So the question is: Has some
I've currently seen the following statement on http://www.gnu.org/home.html:
``New information regarding the Wassenaar agreement indicates that the
information we posted here on the 11th of December was a false alarm. An
attentive reader pointed out to us that The Wassenaar agreement wi
