I've sussed the problem, and thought I'd feed the result back, in case someone
else is similarly stumped.
Issue 1:
I removed gdbm from the apache build, and got 'mm' added. This resolved (by me
simple guessing analysis) about 5-10 % of the cache misses. Possible gdbm on my
box has issues? I
IE?
- Bob
-Original Message-
From: Wallace, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2000 10:17 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: MSIE *Again*
Does changing the "Check for server certificate revocation (requires
restart)" advanced security set
web server).
On a somewhat wierd note, we both have famous Scottish names!
-Original Message-
From: Burns, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2000 10:33 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: MSIE *Again*
William,
That *DID* workdo you happen
Folks,
I believe I'm experiencing the same MSIE problems that
have been discussed on this list over the past few weeks,
but with a little more information. Perhaps it will help.
I'm running Apache 1.3.12 + modssl 2.6.4 + openssl 0.9.5a on
an UltraSparc 10 + Solaris7.
First, I created a dummy
Does changing the "Check for server certificate revocation (requires
restart)" advanced security setting in IE change the behavior?
-Original Message-
From: Burns, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 10:38 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: M
At 09:16 17/07/00 -0600, you wrote:
I'm about to install a new apache server, does anyone have any good
documentation on the best way to install apache, ssl, php, and frontpage
Start clean and simple. And check and check /etc/profile and your
LD_LIBRARY_PATH and LD_RUN_PATH if you have
.
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Gelina" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2000 12:28 PM
Subject: Re: msie AGAIN
Ok, when I put it in debug mode with the new configuration I found that
one
log file and only one file changes when i try to access
, July 17, 2000 3:24 AM
Subject: Re: msie AGAIN
Jeff,
I'm unlikely to be much help on the SSL side (I'm still a newbie to this).
I can get through on https://www.colosoft.com and
https://www.coloinfotech.com
using MS IE 5.01/128.
How about revisiting the IE installations. Have any
On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 09:16:28AM -0600, Jeff Gelina wrote:
SP would be a good idea except that this is Linux 6.2.
I'm about to install a new apache server, does anyone have any good
documentation on the best way to install apache, ssl, php, and frontpage
Since you're still in "DEBUG
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mads Toftum
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2000 9:11 AM
On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 09:16:28AM -0600, Jeff Gelina wrote:
SP would be a good idea except that this is Linux 6.2.
I'm about to install a new
D]Sent: Monday, July 17, 2000 3:24
AMSubject: Re: msie AGAIN Jeff, I'm unlikely
to be much help on the SSL side (I'm still a newbie to this). I
can get through on https://www.colosoft.com andhttps://www.coloinfotech.com using MS IE
5.01/128. How about revisiting the IE installations. Have any
Title:
thanks for the help, but that wasnt much help
:)
- Original Message -
From:
Salvo
Ilardo
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2000 1:58 PM
Subject: RE: msie AGAIN
Mod_ssl includes very good documentation how install apache
and its modules
. If it is too much of a security risk then thats ok,
but if not, I would greatly apprciate it. [EMAIL PROTECTED] is my email
addy.
- Original Message -
From: "David Rees" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2000 7:31 PM
Subject: Re: msie AGAIN
O
errors if
needed.
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Gelina" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2000 12:28 PM
Subject: Re: msie AGAIN
Ok, when I put it in debug mode with the new configuration I found that
one
log file and only one file changes when i try
On Sun, Jul 16, 2000 at 12:02:32PM -0600, Jeff Gelina wrote:
David,
Here you go:
http://www.coinfotech.com/httpdconf.htm
Just one thought - could you try using:
SetEnvIf User-Agent ".*MSIE.*" nokeepalive ssl-unclean-shutdown
Instead of:
SetEnvIf User-Agent ".*MSIE.*" \
On Sun, Jul 16, 2000 at 09:13:47PM +0200, Mads Toftum wrote:
Oh yeah, one other point - I get thrugh now on my msie 5, but the
server name in the certificate doesn't match the server's name!
Ooops - I was a bit too fast on that - I was testing on
https://www.coinfotech.com ;-)
vh
Mads
On Sun, Jul 16, 2000 at 12:02:32PM -0600, Jeff Gelina wrote:
David,
Here you go:
http://www.coinfotech.com/httpdconf.htm
I apprciate the help you have given me so far, thanks
P.S. could you please send me a copy of your httpd.conf file (I am by no
means an expert and would
minnesota.coinfotech.com:443, client 209.12.32.66)
Can you decipher this???
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Lichtin" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2000 7:18 PM
Subject: Re: msie AGAIN
Ok, I have done as you have requested (it was a pain in the
David,
I fixed the add module mod_auth_anon.c, it shouldn't have been pounded out.
I unpounded it. Didn't help though.
Jeff
- Original Message -
From: "David Rees" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2000 7:31 PM
Subject: Re: msie AGAIN
On S
anyone understand that jibberish that I get in the ssl_engine_log??
I think that that is the clue. Something about a sslv3 loop
- Original Message -
From: "Mads Toftum" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2000 1:13 PM
Subject: Re: msie AGAIN
O
/usr/openssl-0.9.5a/libcrypto.a
- Original Message -
From: "David Rees" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2000 7:32 PM
Subject: Re: msie AGAIN
On Fri, Jul 14, 2000 at 07:28:12PM -0600, Jeff Gelina wrote:
Do you know where that rpm is, there
In addition to the mod_ssl-2.6.5-1.i386.rpm, you also need the
openssl-0.9.5a-1.i586.rpm. You probably also want to get the apache rpm
from the same location.
-Dave
On Sat, Jul 15, 2000 at 12:06:15PM -0600, Jeff Gelina wrote:
man i am embarrased one level down, I was thinking contriubution
: "David Rees" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2000 12:16 PM
Subject: Re: msie AGAIN
In addition to the mod_ssl-2.6.5-1.i386.rpm, you also need the
openssl-0.9.5a-1.i586.rpm. You probably also want to get the apache rpm
from the same location.
-Dave
On Sat, Jul 15, 2000 at 06:57:02PM -0600, Jeff Gelina wrote:
Ok, I have done as you have requested (it was a pain in the butt) you will
see the new page at http://minnesota.coinfotech.com but you will not be
able to access the https with any ie browser. Netscape will see it just
fine.
Subject: Re: msie AGAIN
I just checked my browser version from home, I'm using IE 5.5 128
bit...
What is the problem here, can anyone help?
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2000 7:56
over to
ApacheSSL?
Jeff Gelina
ISP Lead
Colorado Information Technologies
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Gelina" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2000 4:54 PM
Subject: Fw: msie AGAIN
Thankyou for responding Martin,
This is what I have
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeff Gelina
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2000 4:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: msie AGAIN
If anyone is out there, like the creater of modssl you may find this
interesting..
I do not think that this is an ie problem I am running IE
5.
Thankyou so much for your response see below to answers to your questions:
- Original Message -
From: "David Rees" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2000 5:53 PM
Subject: RE: msie AGAIN
What versions of IE (4.0, 5.0 5.01, 5.5?) and security leve
What versions of IE (4.0, 5.0 5.01, 5.5?) and security levels (40-bit,
56-bit, 128bit?) are affected besides 5.5? All of them? What
version of
mod_ssl and openssl are you running?
ie 5.0, 5.01, 5.5 both 56-bit and 128-bit have been testedc
openssl version 0.9.5a
modssl 2.6.6-1.3.12
Hey David,
comments below:
- Original Message -
From: "David Rees" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2000 6:11 PM
Subject: RE: msie AGAIN
What versions of IE (4.0, 5.0 5.01, 5.5?) and security levels (40-bit,
56-bit, 128bit?) are affect
David,
I stand corrected, I have downoaded the source for 2.6.5 but have not
installed it yet.
I currently have the rpm of 2.6.2 for mod_ssl
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Gelina" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2000 6:27 PM
Subject: Re:
I stand corrected, I have downoaded the source for 2.6.5 but have not
installed it yet.
I currently have the rpm of 2.6.2 for mod_ssl
OK, If you want to avoid compiling yourself, get the rpm for mod_ssl 2.6.5
and install that, first. Then we'll start the trouble shooting process
again.
David,
Do you know where that rpm is, there is no rpm at www.rpm.org nor can i
find anything at www.modssl.org. Is there even one?
Jeff Gelina
- Original Message -
From: "David Rees" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2000 6:49 PM
Subject: RE:
On Fri, Jul 14, 2000 at 07:28:12PM -0600, Jeff Gelina wrote:
Do you know where that rpm is, there is no rpm at www.rpm.org nor can i
find anything at www.modssl.org. Is there even one?
You didn't look very hard, did you? :-)
http://www.modssl.org/contrib/
-Dave
then Netscape
is messing everyone about. This stuff is hard enough as it is!
John
-Original Message-
From: James H. Cloos Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 July 2000 18:58
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: msie AGAIN
"John" == Airey, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John You
ok, microsoft really Pis___ me off! Why can't
they do anything right? Enough of that, I'm just venting a little.
Anyway, I've spent the last two days trouble shooting this msie5x problem with
https. I've read and reread the manual and the FAQ. As well as
searched for hours on the mailing
]
-Original Message-
From: Filip Van Laenen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 July 2000 08:51
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: msie AGAIN
Hi,
While on the subject, is there an export version of Netscape with 128 bit
encryption? I had a problem similar to yours, but later found
])
Senior Knowledge Engineer, Computas, http://www.computas.com
Telefon: +47 67 83 10 00 Fax: +47 67 83 10 01
-Original Message-
From: Airey, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 11:48 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: msie AGAIN
You will find that all versions
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: msie AGAIN
I have version 4.73 installed, and it says this in the 'About':
--
This version supports U.S. security with RSA
Public Key Cryptography, MD2, MD5, RC2-CBC,
RC4, DES-CBC, DES-EDE3-CBC .
--
I find that sentence a bit
"John" == Airey, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John You will find that all versions of Netscape since 4.72 support
John 128bit encryption out of the box.
No. They still make you go through loops to get the 128bit version,
while the export version (56 now?) is readily available.
Seven (nine
40 matches
Mail list logo
