On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 09:23:27PM -0600, Barry Smoke wrote:
o.k...you have my attention now...
wildcard certificate?
Can wildcard certificates be purchased, or is this only if you are self
signing?
According to Thawte's website they still issue wildcard certs.
I sure would like to buy one
: Montag, 13. Januar 2003 04:23
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Confession: I use NBVHs with SSL (was Re: 2 VirtualHosts
with 2 Certificates)
These NBVHs are all derived off the same 3rd-level domain,
and thus we
can use the same wildcard certificate for each NBVH (users whose
browsers don't
-Original Message-
From: James Collier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I realise I am on thin ice as it would be a reasonable
optimisation to assign the final virtual host at an earlier
stage than is currently the case with SSL.
I wouldn't worry too much. Currently, in an SSL transaction,
-Original Message-
From: James Collier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
At the moment, the handshake take place using the first matching vhost
on the basis of IP+Port, but evidently Apache then scans the decrypted
host header and assigns the correct NBVH.
Exactly. The SSL transaction is
Boyle Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- IPv6 will take off, creating so many IP addresses that NBVH will be
unnecessary and we will revert to one site, one IP.
There is already a document describing how to do this with SSL/TLS
in the IETF standards pipeline.
-Ekr
--
[Eric Rescorla
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 07:32:24AM -0800, Eric Rescorla wrote:
There is already a document describing how to do this with SSL/TLS
in the IETF standards pipeline.
Unfortunately this is not implemented very many places - so far the only
place I've heard of is Apache 2.1 which has some
Mads Toftum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 07:32:24AM -0800, Eric Rescorla wrote:
There is already a document describing how to do this with SSL/TLS
in the IETF standards pipeline.
Unfortunately this is not implemented very many places - so far the only
place I've
Are there any docs for setting this up?
thanks
Robert
- Original Message -
From: James Collier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 12:29 PM
Subject: Re: Confession: I use NBVHs with SSL (was Re: 2 VirtualHosts with 2
Certificates)
Many
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of James Barwick
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 4:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 2 VirtualHosts with 2 Certificates
Should have read the MOST FREQUENTLY ASKED FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS!!!
Can't do that. Learn a little more about SSL. It's IP based
These NBVHs are all derived off the same 3rd-level domain, and thus we
can use the same wildcard certificate for each NBVH (users whose
browsers don't recognise wildcard certificates need only placate the
browser once in most cases).
o.k...you have my attention now...
wildcard certificate?
Can
4:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 2 VirtualHosts with 2 Certificates
Should have read the MOST FREQUENTLY ASKED FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS!!!
Can't do that. Learn a little more about SSL. It's IP based, not name
based. So, you can only have
one certificate and one firtual host
-Original Message-
From: Irving Carrion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Donnerstag, 9. Januar 2003 15:42
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: 2 VirtualHosts with 2 Certificates
Everyone knows this question will not stop coming... is it possible to
return an error message to the user when
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 07:58:10PM +0100, toxshark wrote:
i have the apache configured with 2 VirtualHosts on port 443.
both VirtualServers have separately CertificateFiles and
CertificateKeyFiles.
but now if i connect to the VirtualHost2, the Host have the Certificate
from the
Should have read the MOST FREQUENTLY ASKED FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS!!!
Can't do that. Learn a little more about SSL. It's IP based, not name
based. So, you can only have
one certificate and one firtual host on 92.35.28.17:443. Sorry...but
that's the way it goes.
Same question answer
14 matches
Mail list logo
