RE: Problem with MSIE

2000-06-20 Thread David Rees
I've found that I have to force HTTP 1.0 responses to get all versions of MSIE clients to get them to work reliably, especially during long running CGI responses. I use this line in my SSL virtual host section which seems to be doing the trick so far: SetEnvIf User-Agent ".*MSIE.*" nokeepalive

RE: a kind of off the mark question...

2000-06-20 Thread David Rees
Give openssh/openssl a try, if you have a compiler, it will probably work: http://www.openssh.com/ You'll want to download the portable release from here: http://www.openssh.com/portable.html -Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of

RE: mod_jrun

2000-06-29 Thread David Rees
You need to use the apxs tool to build the mod_jrun module like this: /path-to-apache/bin/apxs -c /path-to-jrun/connectors/apache/src/*.c It should place mod_jrun.so in /path-to-apache/libexec/mod_jrun.so. Then modify your httpd.conf file as usual. This has been working great for me on

RE: [BugDB] Doc bug in FAQ regarding MSIE (PR#405)

2000-06-29 Thread David Rees
I've run across a conflict between the mod_ssl FAQ and the configuration which the distribution seems to actually install. The FAQ recommends the following as a workaround for problems with MSIE: SetEnvIf User-Agent ".*MSIE.*" nokeepalive ssl-unclean-shutdown However, the configuration

RE: [BugDB] Doc bug in FAQ regarding MSIE (PR#405)

2000-06-29 Thread David Rees
The difference of course is that the former hits *all* MSIE browsers, including recent ones which seem to get along fine without the workaround. Also, closing the connection each time, as mandated in the FAQ, has a considerable performance cost, to the point that one site which I'm involved

Confirmed: MSIE 5 56-bit does not work with latest Apache/mod_ssl/openssl

2000-07-03 Thread David Rees
Hi, Just to confirm, we are also seeing the same issues with 56-bit MSIE 5 and Apache 1.3.12, mod_ssl 2.6.4 and openssl 0.9.5a. As far as I can tell, it only affects 56-bit MSIE 5. No SSL pages log at all. There are no messages in the logs. Does anyone know of a workaround which won't affect

sslv3 alert bad certificate?

2000-07-03 Thread David Rees
Hi, I'm seeing messages like this in our ssl_error_log: [Fri Jun 30 22:20:42 2000] [error] mod_ssl: SSL handshake failed (server www.ourserver.com:443, client xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) (OpenSSL library error follows) [Fri Jun 30 22:20:42 2000] [error] OpenSSL: error:14094412:SSL

WORKAROUND: MSIE 5 56-bit does not work with latest Apache/mod_ssl/openssl

2000-07-03 Thread David Rees
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Rees Sent: Monday, July 03, 2000 11:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Confirmed: MSIE 5 56-bit does not work with latest Apache/mod_ssl/openssl Hi, Just to confirm, we are also seeing the same issues with 56-bit MSIE 5 and Apa

EXP56 vs EXPORT56

2000-07-05 Thread David Rees
Hi, I've noticed that on my version of openssl (0.9.5a, compiled on IRIX 6.5), EXP56 does not match the expected 56 bit ciphers that EXPORT56 does. openssl ciphers -v EXP56 openssl ciphers -v EXPORT56 EXP1024-DHE-DSS-RC4-SHA SSLv3 Kx=DH(1024) Au=DSS Enc=RC4(56) Mac=SHA1 export

RE: Anyone seen cpu-100% with mod_ssl 2.6.5, apache 1.3.12

2000-07-10 Thread David Rees
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mads Toftum Sent: Monday, July 10, 2000 7:03 AM On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 04:58:37PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone seen this with mod_ssl 2.6.5 and apache 1.3.12? Web server non-responsive, check the box and one

RE: SSL configuration with Apache

2000-07-11 Thread David Rees
Remember that when you do a "apachectl startssl", it adds the argument -DSSL. So if you do a "httpd -DSSL -l", you should see ssl in there. -Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Diana Moreland Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2000 8:07 AM

RE: SSL configuration with Apache

2000-07-11 Thread David Rees
Strange, what version of Apache are you using? (httpd -v) -Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Diana Moreland Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2000 10:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SSL configuration with Apache Thanks for

RE: SSLMutex

2000-07-11 Thread David Rees
Do this: chmod 755 /django/opt/apache_1.3.12/logs/ssl_mutex* Or even better, shutdown Apache, delete all the ssl_mutex* files, and restart. The ssl_mutex files should be automatically created with the right permissions. Don't do a chmod -R +x apache_1.3.12, it's not a good idea. -Dave

RE: SSLMutex

2000-07-11 Thread David Rees
]]On Behalf Of callen Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2000 12:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SSLMutex David Rees wrote: Or even better, shutdown Apache, delete all the ssl_mutex* files, and restart. -Dave David thanks, I did what you advised with shutting down and restarting: Before

Re: mod_ssl 2.6.5 + php4.0.1pl2 + apache_1.3.12

2000-07-12 Thread David Rees
On Wed, Jul 12, 2000 at 12:41:38AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since the doc still has reference to php3 , I'm curious as to the steps to configure the subject line's configuration. I tried running mod_ssl first, then php4, then compilation of apache, but that didn't work. Any Ideas?

RE: msie AGAIN

2000-07-14 Thread David Rees
What versions of IE (4.0, 5.0 5.01, 5.5?) and security levels (40-bit, 56-bit, 128bit?) are affected besides 5.5? All of them? What version of mod_ssl and openssl are you running? Are you also runing the line: SSLCipherSuite ALL:!ADH:!EXPORT56:RC4+RSA:+HIGH:+MEDIUM:+LOW:+SSLv2:+EXP in your

RE: msie AGAIN

2000-07-14 Thread David Rees
What versions of IE (4.0, 5.0 5.01, 5.5?) and security levels (40-bit, 56-bit, 128bit?) are affected besides 5.5? All of them? What version of mod_ssl and openssl are you running? ie 5.0, 5.01, 5.5 both 56-bit and 128-bit have been testedc openssl version 0.9.5a modssl 2.6.6-1.3.12

RE: msie AGAIN

2000-07-14 Thread David Rees
I stand corrected, I have downoaded the source for 2.6.5 but have not installed it yet. I currently have the rpm of 2.6.2 for mod_ssl OK, If you want to avoid compiling yourself, get the rpm for mod_ssl 2.6.5 and install that, first. Then we'll start the trouble shooting process again.

Re: msie AGAIN

2000-07-14 Thread David Rees
On Fri, Jul 14, 2000 at 07:28:12PM -0600, Jeff Gelina wrote: Do you know where that rpm is, there is no rpm at www.rpm.org nor can i find anything at www.modssl.org. Is there even one? You didn't look very hard, did you? :-) http://www.modssl.org/contrib/ -Dave

Re: msie AGAIN

2000-07-15 Thread David Rees
In addition to the mod_ssl-2.6.5-1.i386.rpm, you also need the openssl-0.9.5a-1.i586.rpm. You probably also want to get the apache rpm from the same location. -Dave On Sat, Jul 15, 2000 at 12:06:15PM -0600, Jeff Gelina wrote: man i am embarrased one level down, I was thinking contriubution

Re: msie AGAIN

2000-07-15 Thread David Rees
On Sat, Jul 15, 2000 at 06:57:02PM -0600, Jeff Gelina wrote: Ok, I have done as you have requested (it was a pain in the butt) you will see the new page at http://minnesota.coinfotech.com but you will not be able to access the https with any ie browser. Netscape will see it just fine.

Re: disconnect SSL Session

2000-07-16 Thread David Rees
On Sun, Jul 16, 2000 at 12:05:08PM -0500, Steve Petty wrote: We are running SSL on Apache 1.3.12 with tomcat, openssl and mod_ssl (on solaris boxes). We have load balanced for the optimum number of connections and all is working fine. However, after the user finishes, departs the last

Re: msie AGAIN

2000-07-16 Thread David Rees
On Sun, Jul 16, 2000 at 12:02:32PM -0600, Jeff Gelina wrote: David, Here you go: http://www.coinfotech.com/httpdconf.htm I apprciate the help you have given me so far, thanks P.S. could you please send me a copy of your httpd.conf file (I am by no means an expert and would

RE: msie AGAIN

2000-07-17 Thread David Rees
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mads Toftum Sent: Monday, July 17, 2000 9:11 AM On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 09:16:28AM -0600, Jeff Gelina wrote: SP would be a good idea except that this is Linux 6.2. I'm about to install a new

Re: IE5 and Client Authentication

2000-07-19 Thread David Rees
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 01:10:12PM +0100, Stuart Gall wrote: It all works just fine with Netscape, however with IE5 5.01 and 5.01SP1 it is very unreliable. Most of the time when I enter the URL I get "DNS Error or server unreachable" After several refreshes it prompts for the

Re: mod_ssl/Internet Explorer/Thawte incompatibility

2000-07-19 Thread David Rees
On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 12:24:01PM +0100, Edward Thomas wrote: Dear All, I am running a site based around mod_ssl 2.6.5, open ssl 0.9.5a and Apache 1.3.12 using a Thawte "Super Certificate" (designed to allow new browsers to use 128 bit encryption outside the USA). The problem is that,

RE: SSLMutex error

2000-07-19 Thread David Rees
Hmmm, looks like an entry for the FAQ! -Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Diana Moreland Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2000 10:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SSLMutex error Thanks for everybody's help. I finally got

RE: Problem with Apache

2000-07-19 Thread David Rees
Judging by the problems you, Jeff Gelina and others have had with using RPMs to install mod_ssl, I can't say that I recommend it! It seems that the most reliable way to get mod_ssl running is to compile entirely from source. -Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: What's this error?

2000-07-19 Thread David Rees
Hmmm, I'm seeing occasional messages like: [Wed Jul 19 11:57:35 2000] [notice] child pid 237216 exit signal Abort (6) [Wed Jul 19 14:39:28 2000] [notice] child pid 231042 exit signal Bus error (10) We mostly see Bus errors, and not that frequent. This is on IRIX 6.5 running with mod_ssl as a

Re: SSLMutex error

2000-07-20 Thread David Rees
On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 01:00:08PM -0400, Diana Moreland wrote: Thanks for everybody's help. I finally got it fixed. Here's what I did (for anybody else that might run in to this.) I tried to change the ownership of the logs directory to the nobody user but it would not change. I looked

Re: What's this error?

2000-07-20 Thread David Rees
On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 10:07:20AM +0200, Mads Toftum wrote: On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 10:52:36AM -0700, David Rees wrote: Hmmm, I'm seeing occasional messages like: [Wed Jul 19 11:57:35 2000] [notice] child pid 237216 exit signal Abort (6) [Wed Jul 19 14:39:28 2000] [notice] child pid

RE: Opinions

2000-07-20 Thread David Rees
Shouldn't be a problem. When building apache, just specify a different --prefix. Don't know about the wildcard certs, though. -Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of callen Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 12:44 PM To: [EMAIL

Re: What's this error?

2000-07-25 Thread David Rees
On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 08:44:49AM -0700, David Rees wrote: On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 10:07:20AM +0200, Mads Toftum wrote: On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 10:52:36AM -0700, David Rees wrote: Hmmm, I'm seeing occasional messages like: [Wed Jul 19 11:57:35 2000] [notice] child pid 237216 exit

RE: What's this error?

2000-07-25 Thread David Rees
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mads Toftum Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2000 10:24 AM On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 09:20:33AM -0700, David Rees wrote: To follow up on my own message, I tested mod_ssl loaded statically into Apache, and I still get bus errors so

RE: What's this error?

2000-07-25 Thread David Rees
Well, I used apxs to compile the JRun module, I'll have to check to make sure that it adds the -DEAPI flag. The bus errors only happen occasionally, so I suspect it's a subtle problem. Apxs usually does it right - /path/to/apache/bin/apxs -q CFLAGS will tell you. Trying without JRun

RE: [BugDB] Segfault on graceful restart (PR#434)

2000-07-26 Thread David Rees
Interesting, I found the same behavior when compiling mod_ssl statically into apache. Loading mod_ssl as a DSO would not core dump when doing a graceful. I did not get a stack trace. Here's the Apache configuration I used: ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/apache --enable-module=ssl

RE: [BugDB] Segfault on graceful restart (PR#434)

2000-07-26 Thread David Rees
OK, I recompiled with -g and have now got a backtrace: 0 SSL_CTX_ctrl(0x0, 0x20, 0xf, 0x0, 0xc, 0x101a8768, 0x10208384, 0x1) ["/local/home/drees/temp2/openssl-0.9.5a/ssl/ssl_lib.c":860, 0x100ec950] 1 ssl_init_ConfigureServer(s = 0x10207380, p = 0x101d58f8, sc = 0x10226140)

RE: [BugDB] Segfault on graceful restart (PR#434)

2000-07-26 Thread David Rees
I have it set to alert. I am trying to to -HUP or -USR1 the truss'ed apache, but nothing gets to it. When I run apache without Truss, it's fine (well, crashes on both -HUP and -USR1). Well, if anyone knows what could be causing this, don't hesitate to post. I am running Solaris 2.7 (Apache

RE: [BugDB] Segfault on graceful restart (PR#434)

2000-07-26 Thread David Rees
Take a look at the patch I just posted a minute ago, it takes care of your concerns (which were mine as well) -Dave -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Cliff WoolleySent: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 3:12 PMTo: [EMAIL

RE: [BugDB] Segfault on graceful restart (PR#434)

2000-07-26 Thread David Rees
To reply to my own message, I've tested this with mod_ssl loaded statically and as a DSO, it works great. No more core dumps when built statically and the memory leak is just about fixed. There's still a small memory leak somewhere, the httpd processes still grow a bit after many (hundreds)

RE: [BugDB] Segfault on graceful restart (PR#434)

2000-07-26 Thread David Rees
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Cliff Woolley Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 3:49 PM The problem appears to be that (at least in the case of static linking) SSL_CTX_new() is returning NULL in ssl_engine_init.c lines 530 or 532, and then

[PATCH] [BugDB] Segfault on graceful restart (PR#434)

2000-07-27 Thread David Rees
release of mod_ssl. I've also included some of the original discussion below. Thanks, Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Rees Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 3:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [BugDB] Segfault on graceful

RE: MSIE problems / SetEnvIf

2000-07-27 Thread David Rees
Even though it does still say HTTP/1.1, I've found that it behaves like a HTTP/1.0 response. -Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Simon Weijgers Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2000 1:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MSIE problems /

RE: [BugDB] Segfault on graceful restart (PR#434)

2000-07-27 Thread David Rees
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ralf S. Engelschall On Thu, Jul 27, 2000, Cliff Woolley wrote: From what I can tell, but it may be a completely unrelated memory leak, I'm not sure. Either way, it's pretty damn small, and not

RE: starting ssl

2000-07-27 Thread David Rees
That should be a: /var/lib/apache/bin/httpd/ -DSSL Notice the missing '-'. That should fix things up. -Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Raymond Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2000 8:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: starting

Re: apache+modssl+... got SEGVs

2000-07-28 Thread David Rees
On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 11:17:14AM +0200, Hugues Pisapia wrote: And sometimes (well, more often with MSIE than with Mozilla :), apache gets Segmentation faults. It seems that it comes from openssl or modssl as i tried many configurations. Apache gets SEGVs only when the virtual host with

Re: starting ssl

2000-07-28 Thread David Rees
On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 01:27:32PM +0800, Raymond wrote: thanks for the reply david but that did not work also. any other suggestions. Can you make your config file available somewhere so we can take a look at it? I've most often found that config file problems are the most frequent cause of

Re: : apache+modssl+... got SEGVs

2000-07-28 Thread David Rees
No one has had good luck when using RPMs to install mod_ssl. I'm afraid that recompiling Apache from scratch is the way to go. What's the problem with the RPMs? I roll them, and if you got a RPM specific porblem, I'll be happy to look at it. Maybe if everyone used the RPMs you rolled

Re: apache+modssl+... got SEGVs

2000-07-29 Thread David Rees
On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 11:06:19AM +0200, GOMEZ Henri wrote: What. The apache-mod_ssl RPM is one of the easier RPM to install. Many Redhat users have switched from Apache-SSL to Apache-mod_ssl since it's a plugin replacement of standard Redhat apache. If you haven't succeed in

Re: apache+modssl+... got SEGVs

2000-07-29 Thread David Rees
On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 08:16:45PM +0200, Mads Toftum wrote: I can't say that I've tried any of the rpm's (but then I've always preferred to build stuff from scratch ;-) I'm sure you're right when you say that the rpm's are easy to use, but I think we've seen a growing number of problems

RE: Still MSIE

2000-07-31 Thread David Rees
Please refer to the FAQ: http://www.modssl.org/docs/2.6/ssl_faq.html#ToC48 In short, adding the lines: SetEnvIf User-Agent ".*MSIE.*" \ nokeepalive ssl-unclean-shutdown \ downgrade-1.0 force-response-1.0 SSLCipherSuite ALL:!ADH:!EXPORT56:RC4+RSA:+HIGH:+MEDIUM:+LOW:+SSLv2:+EXP

RE: spurious SSL handshake interrupt / msie / possible lead!

2000-08-03 Thread David Rees
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Simon Weijgers I'm getting spurious SSL handshake interrupts with MSIE (alot with msie4 (i tried 4.72.3110.4 and 4.72.3612.1713) and sometimes with MSIE 5.00.2614.3500. But this is old news. What I discovered today is that if I

RE: Kill -HUP causes apache to terminate when using mod_ssl

2000-08-04 Thread David Rees
I have recently rebuilt our build of apache 1.3.12 with mod_ssl-2.6.5-1.3.12 , and both the HUP and USR1 signals cause a complete termination of httpd. Syslog catches the following: That is the same story as we've seen a lot about over the last week with graceful restarts. See

Re: Still MSIE

2000-08-06 Thread David Rees
I don't know enough to help them (which is obvious or I wouldnt be writing this) other than do what I did, reinstall everything from the tar balls and never use an rpm again. . Jeff Gelina ISP Colorado Information Technologies - Original Message ----- From: David Rees [EMAIL PROTECT

RE: Kill -HUP causes apache to terminate when using mod_ssl

2000-08-07 Thread David Rees
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ralf S. Engelschall Sent: Monday, August 07, 2000 4:59 AM I'm currently rather busy (with things where others force me to give them high priority), but the patch will be included this week and will

RE: Kill -HUP causes apache to terminate when using mod_ssl

2000-08-07 Thread David Rees
Yes. But Ralf said about the topic: "But I'm still not convinced whether we just need the surrounding #ifdef SHARED_MODULE ... #endif stuff. I really have to look deeper to make sure we solve the problem the correct way and not introduce a new problem (perhaps a new memory leak)." So

RE: Another Virtual Hosts Question (1 SSL + 2 non-SSL, all virtual)

2000-08-07 Thread David Rees
I want to answer http(s) requests for 3 URLs from this server: https://ecom.mydom.com/ http://pik1.mydom.com/ http://pik2.mydom.com/ Q: will name-based virtual hosting support this, or do I need to use an IP-based virtual host for the https? You will only run into problems when trying to

RE: Urgent: SSL handshake failed

2000-08-07 Thread David Rees
I can succesfully compile and run OpenSSL 0.9.5, Apache 1.3.12 with mod_perl 1.24, and mod_ssl 2.6.5-1.3.12 (As you can see... all of these are the last releases of every packet). Though when trying to establish a secured connection from Netscape 4.08 under Windows NT the handshake fails.

RE: Urgent: SSL handshake failed

2000-08-07 Thread David Rees
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Deidy Rosales Sent: Monday, August 07, 2000 10:29 AM Hi, Thanks for responding so quikly! I did read the FAQ you sent me to... and I don't think it applies to my problem cause my browser is not

RE: Urgent: SSL handshake failed

2000-08-07 Thread David Rees
Self-generated.. running actually the test certificate (make certificate) that comes with apache 1.3.12. Have you tried with a more recent version (4.74) of Netscape? Is this Netscape 4.08 on Windows that you're using? -Dave

RE: Urgent: SSL handshake failed

2000-08-07 Thread David Rees
Self-generated.. running actually the test certificate (make certificate) that comes with apache 1.3.12. Have you tried with a more recent version (4.74) of Netscape? Is this Netscape 4.08 on Windows that you're using? Well, with Netscape 4.7 the problem continues, but everything

RE: Problems after installing SSL

2000-08-07 Thread David Rees
The error message is /opt/JRun/connectors/apache/sparc-solaris/mod_jrun.so is crashed with EAPI. Before installing SSL, the apache can start with JRun. What's the problem??? Besides, when I check the apache log file, I find msg like "Failed to generate temporary 512 bit RSA private key".

RE: Another Virtual Hosts Question (1 SSL + 2 non-SSL, all virtual)

2000-08-09 Thread David Rees
Q: will name-based virtual hosting support this, or do I need to use an IP-based virtual host for the https? IP-based. See http://www.modssl.org/docs/2.6/ssl_faq.html#vhosts That's what I thought... it might be clearer to the average bear if a note like "but see the following for

RE: Connect failures

2000-08-09 Thread David Rees
CPU's are averaging about 50% load are not maxing out, so there's plenty of headroom there. The logs show no signs of any errors. Hmmm. Haven't tried mod_status. I'll take a look and see what it tells me. NT wouldn't be my first choice either but *nix isn't a corp.

Re: mod_ssl 2.6.6 delayed

2000-08-12 Thread David Rees
On Sat, Aug 12, 2000 at 06:08:09PM +0200, Mads Toftum wrote: There's always the changes file: http://www.modssl.org/source/exp/mod_ssl/pkg.mod_ssl/CHANGES Yes, but I wasn't sure if it was up to date or not. It looks like all the major issues have made it in, I was just wondering if any other

Re: mod_ssl 2.6.6 delayed

2000-08-12 Thread David Rees
On Sat, Aug 12, 2000 at 10:42:56PM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: The two major bugfixes went in. The changes entries are also always appended to my ANNOUNCE postings. The new features from my development queue (alternative Stronghold 3 round robin shared memory cache, LDAP support, etc),

RE: Internut Exploder

2000-08-15 Thread David Rees
Can you specify an exact version of IE which this occurs at? How many bit encryption browser and certificate are you using? Are you using the specified IE workarounds listed on the FAQ? It sounds like you're running into the MSIE keep-alive bug. -Dave -Original Message-From:

RE: Vhosts behavior question (1 SSL, 1 non-SSL)

2000-08-15 Thread David Rees
actually i have configured it using ip-based virtual host because i am aware of that part in the FAQ. using your example as a pattern, i got that error message. then i tried to define my NameVirtualHost using the ports to be used and it seems to work fine now. NameVirtualHost

RE: Error or Warn?

2000-08-16 Thread David Rees
I wouldn't worry about it. As the hint says, someone probably pressed stop in their browser. I see these messages on my servers as well. -Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Penny Rand Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2000 4:40 PM To:

RE: [BugDB] Staticly linked mod_ssl on Linux core dumps on SIGUSR1 (PR#444)

2000-08-31 Thread David Rees
This is fixed in mod_ssl 2.6.6. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 4:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [BugDB] Staticly linked mod_ssl on Linux core dumps on

RE: DNS problems with IE

2000-09-07 Thread David Rees
If you've tried adding the two lines below, and this does not help, the next thing to check is your installation itself. What version of apache/mod_ssl/openssl are you running? Did you build from tarballs or install from RPMs? I've found that the two lines below fix all problems with all

RE: DNS problems with IE

2000-09-07 Thread David Rees
I installed from RPM, Versions used, Apache 1.3.12 OpenSSL 0.9.5a mod_ssl 2.6.5 I am thinking about re-downloading the rpm's from other sites (other than mod_ssl I assume it is legit) and see if that helps. Where did you download the original rpms? Downloading the RPMs from the

Re: Installing mod_ssl

2000-09-11 Thread David Rees
On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 04:18:36PM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: You are trying to build and ancient version (2.1) of mod_ssl against OpenSSL. Forget this, even if it works after some fiddling. As I said in the other threads, please start from scratch with Apache 1.2.12, mod_ssl 2.6.6

RE: Segmentation Fault

2000-09-13 Thread David Rees
I see this same thing (occasional segmentation faults) on Irix 6.5.x running Apache 1.3.12 / mod_ssl 2.6.6. I've seen this behavior since mod_ssl 2.6.4, but haven't tested earlier versions than that. I've tried different ssl session caches (none, dbm, shm) and building mod_ssl statically

Re: Segmentation Fault

2000-09-14 Thread David Rees
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 09:51:23AM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: As it looks, all of you who have seen segfaults, have them on Solaris. Let me suggest you to re-build Apache+mod_ssl+OpenSSL as a static program (no DSOs at all)? Because the brain-dead "load modules twice" approach of

Re: Installation

2000-09-14 Thread David Rees
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 04:17:51PM -0700, Jackson Ching wrote: I have successfully compiled the openssl already, but i am confuse on what parameters i should place in the compilation of modssl. I'm using RedHat Linux 6.2, Apache 1.3.12 (RPM version), JServ 1.1.2 (RPM version), openssl

RE: -DEAPI errors

2000-09-26 Thread David Rees
You're going to have to recompile the jserv module to remove this warning. -Dave -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 2:44 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: -DEAPI errors hi,

RE: -DEAPI errors

2000-09-26 Thread David Rees
. all of the other modules have this error as well. All of the modules are compiled with the the -DEAPI flag on the compilers command line - Original Message - From: David Rees To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 3:15 PM

RE: -DEAPI errors

2000-09-26 Thread David Rees
Are you sure the modules being compiled with -DEAPI are the ones being loaded by Apache? -Dave -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 3:32 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:

Stack trace of SIGBUS on IRIX

2000-10-04 Thread David Rees
I finally found some time to get a debugger on the apache processes, and do some load testing until one of the children sigbussed. It seems that leaving the debugger on caused most of them to sigbus, and eventually some children started showing sigsegv in another section of code. I haven't had

RE: Stack trace of SIGBUS on IRIX

2000-10-04 Thread David Rees
--Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Rees Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2000 2:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Stack trace of SIGBUS on IRIX I finally found some time to get a debugger on the apache processes, and do some load tes

RE: Best mod_ssl version for 1.3.3?

2000-10-05 Thread David Rees
Hi Jeff, The latest version of apache/mod_ssl/openssl is what you want to be using. This means apache-1.3.12, mod_ssl 0.9.6 and openssl 0.9.5a or 0.9.6. -Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeff Mayzurk Sent: Wednesday, October 04,

RE: Stack trace of SIGBUS on IRIX

2000-10-05 Thread David Rees
My guess is that the SIGBUS is probably something that happens because you've got it running under the debugger. The SIGSEGV more looks like the real problem here - I'm no expert at reading debugger output ;-) but it looks like the problem is in adding entries to the session cache, when

RE: Trying to install JServ and mod_ssl...but having problems

2000-10-05 Thread David Rees
I've been trying to get JServ and mod_ssl running at the same time. I can get one or the other working, not both together. It there a way to create a Makefile that includes both packages so I only have to compile one time? You need to do is to build mod_ssl first as a DSO. Then go ahead

RE: Best mod_ssl version for 1.3.3?

2000-10-05 Thread David Rees
Thanks, but if you note my original message, I said we're locked into Apache 1.3.3 because of a third party module. Or, in other words, we can't upgrade to Apache 1.3.12 and mod_ssl 2.6.x. Ah, sorry, I did not see that. We're observing large memory leaks with mod_ssl 2.0.15. So my questions

RE: Stack trace of SIGBUS on IRIX

2000-10-05 Thread David Rees
Ah, sorry - I didn't take the time to read through your earlier messages ;-) But then this seems to be more or less outside mod_ssl (unless this is specifically an eapi thingy - I don't have my source tree handy) ... have you seen the same problems when running without -DSSL ? I have not

RE: make install + change of certificates

2000-10-05 Thread David Rees
2 questions: - once I have installed everything (apache/mod_ssl) with a specific key/certificate, can I change the key/certificate without having to reconfigure and reinstall everything? Most definately. It's definable in a couple of configuration options in httpd.conf. -

RE: JServ and mod_ssl together

2000-10-06 Thread David Rees
Rick, The mod_ssl instructions work very well. Here are the exact steps (which assume you are using bash, mostly from the INSTALL document in the mod_ssl package) I use to install: $ gzip -d -c apache_1.3.12.tar.gz | tar xvf - $ gzip -d -c mod_ssl_2.6.6-1.3.12.tar.gz | tar xvf - $ gzip -d -c

RE: HEADS UP: shmcb engine

2000-10-09 Thread David Rees
According to Geoff's tests, it both increases performance and provides a more robust and efficient session cache. But I've no numbers at hand, although I know that Geoff has numbers (actually graphs). Geoff, can you make your benchmarking details for c2shm available to the people? That would

RE: Another cry for help/JServ and mod_ssl

2000-10-10 Thread David Rees
So, everything went fine, I now have Apache1.3.12 with mod_ssl 2.6.6-1.3.12 and openssl 0.9.6 and mm 1.1.3 running on my caldera OpenLinux 2.3. I also built mod_jserv, and everything just went smoothly. But when I come to the last step, configuring ApacheJServ like this: root@caldera

RE: Another cry for help/JServ and mod_ssl

2000-10-11 Thread David Rees
Are you sure that the file /usr/local/JSDK2.0/lib/jsdk.jar exists and that your java executable is /usr/local/jdk/bin/java? What does `which java` say? -Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hiendl Elke I wrote it like this: #

LOL! RE: [BugDB] Stay away from my domain name (PR#466)

2000-10-11 Thread David Rees
LOL! I'm finding this guy more funny than anything! :-) -Dave Hi--you'll continue to get these messages until you cease your take-over of MY SITE. snip __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)

RE: Who is this clueless moron?

2000-10-11 Thread David Rees
Ah, another interesting day on the mod_ssl list. :-) Good to see that most people are taking this lightheartedly. -Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael T. Babcock Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 10:54 AM "[EMAIL

Re: Apache with mod_ssl problems

2000-10-12 Thread David Rees
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 04:34:40PM -0400, Aaron Beveridge wrote: Some users are having problems connecting to the server I just set up. I am using Apache_1.3.12, mod_ssl-2.6.6-1.3.12, rsaref-2.0, and openssl-0.9.6 on a RedHat 6.2 system. They are getting a "Server not found" error. I have

RE: Bus Error(10)

2000-10-12 Thread David Rees
Do you have stack traces from these sigbus errors? If you set the CoreDumpDirectory parameter in your httpd.conf to a directory that your httpd processes can write you, then you can run a debugger on the core and get a stack trace. -Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: SSL Handshake Errors.

2000-10-13 Thread David Rees
I see those SSL handshake messages all the time, but I suspect that it's actually because people are pressing stop on their browsers. :-) If people are seeing "page cannot be displayed" messages occasionaly, this sounds like the keep-alive problem with MSIE. Do you have the following in your

RE: apache-1.3.14 fails to start with modssl-2.7.0 on IRIX65

2000-10-13 Thread David Rees
I'll see if I can verify this on my IRIX machines here. We've been running apache_1.3.12/mod_ssl 2.6.6 with good results so far, and was planning on testing the latest release in the next two weeks. -Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf

RE: apache-1.3.14 fails to start with modssl-2.7.0 on IRIX65

2000-10-13 Thread David Rees
Looking at your error a little closer, it looks like a configuration error. I did not have any problems compiling running mod_ssl 2.7.0-1.3.14 over here: [Sat Oct 14 06:14:04 2000] [notice] Apache/1.3.14 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.7.0 OpenSSL/0.9.6 configured -- resuming normal operations This is on

RE: apache-1.3.14 fails to start with modssl-2.7.0 on IRIX65

2000-10-13 Thread David Rees
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Rees Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 10:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: apache-1.3.14 fails to start with modssl-2.7.0 on IRIX65 Looking at your error a little closer, it looks like a configuration error

RE: apache-1.3.14 fails to start with modssl-2.7.0 on IRIX65

2000-10-13 Thread David Rees
326mS[ 0] : exit(1) Hmm, where's that : coming from?!?! See if I can find that in the apache source. -Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Rees Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 10:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sub

  1   2   3   >