2009/2/10 Porcari Giovanni giovanni.porc...@softwell.it:
Il giorno 10/feb/09, alle ore 01:05, Graham Dumpleton ha scritto:
Giovanni, if you are still reading, would it be possible for you to
try with Apache 2.2.9 and Python 2.5.2 that ship with MacOS X
(Leopard) instead of your separate
2009/2/10 Graham Dumpleton graham.dumple...@gmail.com:
2009/2/10 Graham Dumpleton graham.dumple...@gmail.com:
2009/2/10 Porcari Giovanni giovanni.porc...@softwell.it:
Il giorno 10/feb/09, alle ore 01:05, Graham Dumpleton ha scritto:
Giovanni, if you are still reading, would it be possible
2009/2/10 Graham Dumpleton graham.dumple...@gmail.com:
2009/2/10 Graham Dumpleton graham.dumple...@gmail.com:
2009/2/10 Graham Dumpleton graham.dumple...@gmail.com:
2009/2/10 Porcari Giovanni giovanni.porc...@softwell.it:
Il giorno 10/feb/09, alle ore 01:05, Graham Dumpleton ha scritto:
Hi,
I'm studying pinax and trying to create a 'best practice' to setup
pinax on ubuntu 8.10 with Apache/mod_wsgi and MySQL. When I'm done
I'll submit it to the pinax team and hopefully they'll add it to the
docs.
I'm not looking for custom high performance settings just for settings
that will
On Feb 9, 8:49 pm, Ariel Mauricio Nunez Gomez
ingenieroar...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks a lot Graham.
I applied all your suggestions to one of the servers and my template
mod_wsgi config.
What was recommended in turbogears2 when deploying was to add:
import paste.fixture
app =
WSGIDaemonProcess pinax threads=1 processes=25 python-path=/home/user/
pinax-env/lib/python2.5/site- packages
WSGIProcessGroup pinax
Just so Graham does not hate me for giving bad advice:
If you are not using any 'thread unsafe' python lib outside the Pinax
dependencies (like GeoDjango)
For reference, further detail on aspects of this question at:
http://groups.google.com/group/pinax-users/browse_frm/thread/8cbc9857c1b9c4b2?q=mod_wsgi
I'll respond later in more detail.
Graham
2009/2/11 pablo.pl...@gmail.com pablo.pl...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I'm studying pinax and trying to
On Feb 10, 11:01 am, Graham Dumpleton graham.dumple...@gmail.com
wrote:
2009/2/10 Graham Dumpleton graham.dumple...@gmail.com:
2009/2/10 Porcari Giovanni giovanni.porc...@softwell.it:
Il giorno 10/feb/09, alle ore 01:05, Graham Dumpleton ha scritto:
Giovanni, if you are still reading,
2009/2/11 Graham Dumpleton graham.dumple...@gmail.com:
For reference, further detail on aspects of this question at:
http://groups.google.com/group/pinax-users/browse_frm/thread/8cbc9857c1b9c4b2?q=mod_wsgi
I'll respond later in more detail.
It may take me a bit longer to get to this than
It may take me a bit longer to get to this than had hoped. Daddy day
care today and baby demanding a lot of attention and hasn't adjusted
to timezone after getting back form holidays which is making it all
the more fun.
Sounds like fun!
For someone who does not know pinax except that it
What is GeoDango and how does that come into it? What are the
multithreading issues in GeoDango?
GeoDjango is django.contrib.gis
This could be part of your problem -- it should be `threads=1`. This
is because GEOS is not a thread safe library, and the serialization to
WKT code in particular
2009/2/11 Ariel Mauricio Nunez Gomez ingenieroar...@gmail.com:
What is GeoDango and how does that come into it? What are the
multithreading issues in GeoDango?
GeoDjango is django.contrib.gis
This could be part of your problem -- it should be `threads=1`. This
is because GEOS is not a
The prefork MPM is only relevant if you are running in embedded mode.
If using mod_wsgi daemon mode for WSGI application, where you are
separately controlling number of processes/threads for the daemon
process group, doesn't really matter.
If have separate requirement to also run mod_php,
13 matches
Mail list logo
