On 11/04/16 09:18, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> # set patch tag at least to get some attention, may need some tweaking
> # since pagesize on buildd machine != user installed one
> Control: tags -1 patch
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> Dear all,
On 31/03/16 13:37, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am currently trying to resurrect Mono debian package on PowerPC (32bits BE).
>
> I have two questions:
>
> - Is there a released version I should consider to start with if I
> want to make mono work son PowerPC again ?
I'd look at
You can use a glue library to normalise the API signatures, or have a bunch of
conditional checks on your pinvokes
Sent from my Sony Xperia™ smartphone
mono-devel-list-requ...@lists.ximian.com wrote
>Send Mono-devel-list mailing list submissions to
>
On 28/12/15 09:37, Pin Cheng wrote:
> Hi there,
> I am trying to porting Mono 4.2.1 into aix 6.1, it was compiled in 32bits
> mode.
> At present, I faced a segment fault at :
> return runtime_invoke (obj, params, exc, info->compiled_method);
> this is line is the last one in function
un...@lists.ximian.com
> [mailto:mono-devel-list-boun...@lists.ximian.com] On Behalf Of Jo Shields
> Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 8:15 PM
> To: mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
> Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] About porting Mono to aix (Mono-devel-list Digest,
> Vol 127, Issue 17)
>
On 20/11/15 03:07, Zhanxing Ding wrote:
> Hi,
> Recently I tried to port mono to IBM aix6.1 system, did any one try to do
> this before,
> and I met a problem and I didn't know how to fixed, on compiling runtime
> module, it need
> a monolite to compile it, but I think there is not a supported
Hi all
We will be (maybe have already done? I should check) shutting down
wrench.mono-project.com imminently.
This is the public instance of our in-house CI tool, MonkeyWrench
(https://github.com/mono/monkeywrench).
Wrench has many functions which make it a great CI system for certain
On 12/11/15 15:02, Numpsy wrote:
> Speaking of a 64bit OSX build, I see that a universal build has appeared at
>
> http://download.mono-project.com/archive/4.2.1/macos-10-universal/
>
> Getting closer to an official release now :-)
I don't think it's going to be "official" for 4.2, but moving
On 09/11/15 19:37, Edward Ned Harvey (mono) wrote:
> Right now, when I follow the instructions to install mono
> http://www.mono-project.com/docs/getting-started/install/linux/#centos-fedora-and-derivatives
>
> rpm --import
>
On 06/11/15 10:28, Dan Liew wrote:
> On 6 November 2015 at 05:29, Rodrigo Kumpera wrote:
>> Mono ignores those settings and will run with the bitness it was compiled
>> as.
>
> Okay, by "it" I presume you are referring to the target Mono was
> compiled for, not the target
On 10/10/15 03:38, Ludovic Henry wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> The unhandled exception you observe is due to a race condition which
> triggers with the managed test runner. If you use make -C mono/tests
> runtest (instead of runtest-managed) you will not get this crash. I am
> working on fixing it.
On 21/09/15 22:03, Greg Young wrote:
> I am surprised to see no one else post on this.
>
> I would think a massive regression that prevents mono from running
> multi-threaded code on a multi-cpu system (including in the future on
> any v4 kernel) might be an issue that people would be concerned
On 17/08/15 14:44, Rodrigo Kumpera wrote:
The fix will be part of mono 4.2.0.
We could later backport it to mono 4.0.5 if 4.2 is not an option.
If needed, patches can be (and have been) applied to the Linux package
builds which aren't formally part of a given version number - the Linux
On 17/07/15 09:43, techi eth wrote:
Hi,
How can i do dll obfuscate with mono on linux ?
I've had success with https://github.com/lextm/obfuscar
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
On 11/07/15 13:15, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello Timotheus,
Saturday, July 11, 2015, 12:14:12 PM, you wrote:
TP please also install the package mono-opt-devel. That includes
TP /opt/mono/lib/libMonoPosixHelper.so, I just checked.
Despite naming conventions, libMonoPosixHelper.so is
On 22/05/15 01:16, cyd wrote:
Let me back up a few steps before I start troublehooting this.
Does the monolite build of mono 4.0 support ARM...specifically ARMv7? If
so, are there any modifications I need to make before running 'make make
install?'
Monolite is CPU-agnostic. It's just
On 21/05/15 12:39, cyd wrote:
Done. Results were:
make[3]: Entering directory `/bld/mono/mono-4.0.0/mono/mini'
MONO_PATH=/bld/mono/mono-4.0.0/mcs/class/lib/net_4_5
../../runtime/mono-wrapper /bld/mono/mono-4.0.0/mcs/class/lib/build/mcs.exe
-unsafe -nowarn:0162 -out:TestDriver.dll
On 20/05/15 06:02, techi eth wrote:
Hi,
Is their any compatibility matrix for monodevelop mono version on ubuntu
14.04 ?
What do you have in mind?
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
on this procedure. As time goes by, I'll make sure
the website gets automatically updated too, so it'll be clear which
4-part versions should be considered stable
On 16/05/15 15:23, Alex J Lennon wrote:
On 16/05/2015 14:23, Jo Shields wrote:
On 16/05/15 12:55, Alex J Lennon wrote:
On 16/05
On 16/05/15 12:55, Alex J Lennon wrote:
On 16/05/2015 13:14, Alex J Lennon wrote:
Hi,
Building the 4.0.1.34 release is erroring on the install step
/usr/bin/install: cannot stat
'targets/Microsoft.Portable.VisualBasic_4.0.targets': No such file or
directory
It seems these two target
On 15/04/15 14:21, Fabian Pietsch wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to compile Mono GIT mono-3.12.0-branch on the Raspberry
Pi (ARMv6), on Raspbian/armhf (Mono 3.2.8), with monolite-111-latest
3.6.1.0 as bootstrap compiler.
I'm building like this:
mono $ ./autogen.sh --prefix=/usr/local
On 09/04/15 18:48, Keedi Kim wrote:
Hi, guys.
I tried recent version of Mono (3.12.X) on Windows XP machine. I've
installed Visual C++ 2013 (x86) redistributable, then installed Mono. But
every mono related executables are failed to run. The error message was:
mono.exe is not a valid
On 27/03/15 13:59, Greg Young wrote:
I am running into this on a build ubuntu 14.14 box bootstrapped with
3.12.1 (first pull down of sources)
Which specific commit?
We run CI builds of Mono, and should be able to tell you whether a given
commit is known-bad or not.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi
A TLS impersonation attack was discovered in Mono's TLS stack by
researchers at Inria. During checks on our TLS stack, we have
discovered two further issues which we have fixed - SSLv2 support, and
vulnerability to FREAK. These vulnerabilities
On 18/02/15 13:09, Rafael Mueller - Inventti wrote:
Currently the .so is in the same directory as the application, and the main
application is marked as x86.
running: MONO_LOG_LEVEL=debug ../MONO312/bin/mono SimuladorPDV.exe
I got:
Mono: DllImport error loading library
It's a security project - by making builds (optionally) deterministic, you
enable users to verify bit-for-bit that software compiled by a benevolent build
server or benevolent developer is actually the same as when they compile the
software themselves. Otherwise, it is possible (or even
On 09/02/15 16:46, sean_houston wrote:
apache2-mod_mono-3.12 is available in the CentOS package repo; however, the
repo is missing xsp-3.12. This is forcing the use of apache2-mod_mono-3.8
since xsp-3.12 is a requirement for installing apache2-mod_mono-3.12. Will
it be possible for the
On 02/02/15 06:20, Angelo Compagnucci wrote:
Hello List,
Anybody willing to help here?
Some other infos. The package is built inside buildroot and with the
previous mono version there were no problems at all.
Now, on mips, and only on mips, I have that strange error. It seems
like to me
On 29/01/15 00:54, zvonimir wrote:
Hi all,
So I am having trouble understanding (and upgrading) NUnit versions that
come with mono.
In particular, it seems that on openSUSE mono 3.8.0 comes with NUnit 2.4.8.
On the other hand, on Ubuntu mono 3.2.8 seems to come with NUnit 2.6.0.
I find
Dear all,
We're currently considering upgrading the Visual Studio project files
for the Mono runtime to require VS2013 as a minimum, rather than 2012.
This introduces two major features for us - it means C99 compatibility
so we can clean up the runtime to use standard C99 types throughout, and
On 22/01/15 22:26, Sebastien Pouliot wrote:
No, not for Linux. There is (or at least was) no OS API that provided that
service and not every distro shipped/installed-by-default any library that
could do this.
Sebastien
Further to this, because Linux is About Choice(tm), there are three
On 22/01/15 11:56, Edward Ned Harvey (mono) wrote:
http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2010/Dec-31.html
Arthur, how about this:
Sometimes it may be true that it might be difficult to get changes pulled
into mono source, but you haven't made a compelling case for certmgr to be
separated out
Even if cert-sync won't work on OSX due to having no concatenated file
available, can mozroots be automated into the OSX mono installer?
It could be. I did some experimenting this morning.
security find-certificate -a -p
/System/Library/Keychains/SystemRootCertificates.keychain tmp.crt
sudo
On 15/01/15 06:41, oferyach wrote:
Using mono from repository on the traget (apt-get install mono) does work, so
it is not a wrong CPU.
I still need to complie since I would need to run also on big-endian and I
cannot find ready binaries.
AFAIK, Mono does not support big-endian ARM. It's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/01/15 02:37, Edward Ned Harvey (mono) wrote:
Is Sebastien on this list? I'm just guessing he'll have an
opinion, or at least a passing interest. I guess Miguel, too.
When a client application makes a SSL/TLS connection to a server,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/12/14 19:41, Alexander K?plinger wrote:
Hey Jo, I tried it and it installed fine for me. However, the
version is currently set to 3.12.1 in
https://github.com/directhex/newbuilder/blob/master/resources/build.bat
and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everyone
Following on from lots of recent discussion, I've got the first test
build of Mono for Windows which I'd describe as usable.
This is based on the mono-3.12.0-branch branch on github.
Please report success or failure with it, as I'm not
On 30/11/14 14:09, Alexander K?plinger wrote:
Hey Alex,
Jo Shields is currently working on revamping the Windows Installer in his
repo: https://github.com/directhex/newbuilder
I contributed the WiX setup files for creating an MSI installer. Jo sent me
this link for a preview build
On 30/11/14 01:13, Edward Ned Harvey (mono) wrote:
From: mono-devel-list-boun...@lists.ximian.com [mailto:mono-devel-list-
boun...@lists.ximian.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Morgan
I see the latest version of Mono's Windows installer is 3.2.3.? Can this be
used
to build the latest from git?
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/11/14 23:00, Rodrigo Kumpera wrote:
Hi ppl,
We're rounding up mono 3.12 as we speak. (y'all probably heard the
github gossip about such a branch existing ;)
This would be a great opportunity to gather feedback on what
blocking bugs
On 07/10/14 07:50, spiko wrote:
I got the same error yesterday, it was said to be because of CDN issues, but
today I get new error:
W: A error occurred during the signature verification. The repository is not
updated and the previous index files will be used. GPG error:
On 16/09/14 12:31, Marek Safar wrote:
Linux, it's not. i do not think this is a Mono issue, but will it be better
to help set the execute permission if Process.Start calls a non-executable
file? or at least provide a more friendly exception, current the error
message is 'Cannot find the
On 08/13/2014 01:47 PM, Bob Summerwill wrote:
I would be delighted to contribute all of these Tizen changes back to
Xamarin,
including reassigning copyright of all the build scripts and VM
building.
I would also be happy to pay for any VMs and storage capacity which you
need
to carry
On 07/30/2014 05:41 PM, Bob Summerwill wrote:
That's what I thought, Miguel.
Thanks for the clarification.
With regard to the Tizen RPMs, should I just log a Bugzilla ticket to get a
link added to the Mono Project downloads Web page when 3.6 gets released?
Thanks.
Bob,
Adding Tizen RPMs to
I saw that PCL is working, how do I get the reference assemblies?
___
Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
On 03/08/12 13:00, mono-devel-list-requ...@lists.ximian.com wrote:
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 04:12:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: aditya3098 aditya3...@gmail.com
To: mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
Subject: [Mono-dev] WebKit not working.
Message-ID: 1343733138981-4650657.p...@n4.nabble.com
On 13/07/12 13:00, mono-devel-list-requ...@lists.ximian.com wrote:
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 23:31:37 -0400
From: Roberto Bufadel jjz...@gmail.com
To: mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com.
Subject: [Mono-dev] Webbrowser in mono hangs
Message-ID: 201207112331.38201.jjz...@gmail.com
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 12:17 +0200, Anton Andreev wrote:
Hi,
But you can also add support for the just released Debian 6.0 / kFreeBSD:
The following issues describe the problem:
1. Patch please support kfreebsd by update libgc to gc6.8
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321634
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 13:19 +0200, Anton Andreev wrote:
Hi,
I could not compile it with the instructions here:
http://www.mono-project.com/Compiling_Mono_From_Git
I entered this command:
git clone git://github.com/mono/mono.git
and I installed all the dependencies (or maybe not all?
On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 11:31 -0600, Steven Munroe wrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 23:54 +, Jo Shields wrote:
=== SPARC ===
On SPARC, we fail to build fully - the runtime explodes with a SIGSEGV
whilst compiling gacutil.exe. Log:
http://retro.apebox.org/mono210/buildlog.sparc
We're having problems building Mono 2.10~rc1 for 4 out of the 9 Debian
architectures we build for (out of 14 arches in Debian overall). All of
these were fine on 2.6.7, the version in Debian 6.0
=== s/390 ===
As far as I can tell, Support for 31-bit s/390 is gone, and only 64-bit
zSeries (s390x)
=== SPARC ===
On SPARC, we fail to build fully - the runtime explodes with a SIGSEGV
whilst compiling gacutil.exe. Log:
http://retro.apebox.org/mono210/buildlog.sparc
SPARC is one of the most popular minority architectures in Debian,
and we would hate to lose it, especially when
On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 19:56 +, Jo Shields wrote:
* The test suite fails to build. That's not intentional.
Bug #1: missing mono/tests/finally_guard.cs from tarball
(seems fixed in e50fc47fd550ba957534)
Bug #2: missing mcs/class/Mono.Debugger.Soft/Test/dtest-app.cs from
tarball
(not fixed
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 16:35 -0700, Andrew Jorgensen wrote:
The first public preview of mono 2.10 is out. Get it here:
http://mono.ximian.com/monobuild/preview/download-preview/
Draft release notes are here:
http://www.go-mono.com/archive/2.10
Notably absent are PowerPC, including Mac and
On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 11:23 -0500, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
Hello,
This looks good to me. Can you commit to the various branches?
Just landed in trunk - am checkout out mono-2-4 and mono-2-6 now.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi,
I've got a functionality enhancement which I'd love to see for Mono, and
was told that the best place to discuss it was here on the list.
First, the background. Apport[1] is a system which originated in
Ubuntu, and has subsequently been available in other distributions such
as
On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 00:49 -0600, Ray Wang wrote:
By the way, Where could I get the mono_2.4 source package?
There is not a mono_2.4 source files in your repository. :)
http://packages.debian.org/source/sid/mono
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 08:56 -0700, Andrew Jorgensen wrote:
There are some significant problems with the mono-find-(provides|requires)
scripts as they exist now. Some examples will illustrate the problem best:
smuxi requires mono(log4net) which is provided by log4net but it is also
58 matches
Mail list logo