can anyone direct me to see the image of the OS of 1942 RANDOM HARVEST.
i have seen 2 diff one sheets, both are undated, but the images identical
except that on one image on the top it says:
Another triumph from Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer
on the other it states:
Another triumph from
Helmut Hamm wrote: My question to Ed and Sue from LAMP is: Do you actually
still see a 'controversy' over this issue [the authenticity of the minty
white inserts]? Quite frankly, everybody I know seems to think they are fake.
Everybody else on the list, please be so kind and refrain from
WTB Key photo set for Wizard of Oz and or Gone With the Wind
call or email
Jim Episale
800 872 9990
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.11/838 - Release Date: 6/7/2007
2:21 PM
Visit the MoPo Mailing List
Thanks to Bruce for weighing in on this matter.
Since a few days have passed, I also feel it is fair to open this discussion.
Personally, I have no doubt that the 'minty white' inserts are
reproductions, and that they were made long after the original
release.
Helmut Hamm
Galerie
Instead of getting people opinions on these inserts, isn't there some
way to find out the actual story? I'm just asking -- I haven't really
followed on this but someone out there must know the REALITY of the
situation.
Channing Thomson in San Francisco
Visit the MoPo Mailing List
Hi -
Some great press kits ending tonight. ALL AUCTIONS END AFTER THE FINAL EPISODE
OF THE SOPRANOS!! Please check these out:
SOME GREAT PRESS KITS:
SCHINDLER'S LIST - Spielberg - AA Winner BEST PICTURE:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemcategory=60357item=270127045544
ALIEN
Channing wrote: Instead of getting people opinions on these inserts, isn't
there some way to find out the actual story? I'm just asking -- I haven't
really followed on this but someone out there must know the REALITY of the
situation.
Channing
If these were printed by individuals years after
I have been dubious about the minty white inserts for a long time,
but I don't KNOW.
I would certainly not buy one knowingly with the intention of
reselling it. I am in the reselling business,
and I want people to have confidence that what they buy from me is
authentic. If avoiding
these
Hi, Everyone,
Not only do I have original US one sheets on ESCAPE FROM NEW YORK, THE SPY
WHO LOVED ME (NM), an INCREDIBLE linen-backed one sheet on WHEN MY BABY
SMILES AT ME (Betty Grable,1948) closing WITHIN 8 TO 9 HOURS, but also more
that 40 OTHER Auctions---lots of GREAT,
hey michael and list,
MRS MINIVER was released in the US, on June 4, 1942 in NY, and on
July 22, 1942, in los angeles. RANDOM HARVEST was released on
December 17, 1942. it would only make sense that MINIVER was released
first if the poster text for HARVEST said,from the producers of MRS
Hey Bruce/Mopo:
Well, there's no question they're fakes. If they were real, all these guys
would have to do is publicly display ONE SINGLE insert that came from a
theatre. One insert that is from the same print-run as the 'minty whites'.
Just one. Prove that ONE of them existed 30 years
Oh yeah, I never actually worked at an NSS warehouse before, but I think a
couple people on here did, so I'd love to hear them chime in. But, I've
been inside several poster-distributors - and the idea that there was
literally thousands of each title of the most highly used (and popular)
Mopos -
Got to wondering just how many poster sell, want, trade and discuss
major chat groups (a few hundred folks or larger) are out there on the
internet and what are the plus and minus points as well as contact info
for each one?
Alan Adler
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site
please let me know.
thanks,
David Lieberman
CineMasterpieces.com
602 309 0500
_CineMasterpieces.com_ (http://www.cinemasterpieces.com/)
Please vote YES for each one of our _eBay GUIDES_
(http://search.reviews.ebay.com/members/cinemasterpieces_W0QQuqtZg) .
Check out our _eBay
I think you underestimate yourself, Bruce. With all of your resources
in the movie poster world, I have no doubt that at some point, sooner
or later, you'll have a definitive answer. As to my opinion, whatever
that is worth, they look like fakes to me. Someone once said if it's
too good to
I think they are clearly repro's of some sort and would not touch one
with a 10 foot pole.
Sam
Posteritati
239 Centre Street
New York, NY 10013
212-226-2207/ Fax: 212-226-2102
http://www.posteritati.com/
On Jun 10, 2007, at 10:35 AM, Bruce Hershenson wrote:
Helmut Hamm wrote: My question
look at the extra paint! boy, that small town theatre owner didnt want you
see Yvonne's.
LINK:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemih=011sspagename=STRK%3AMEWA%3AITviewitem=item=320125761767rd=1rd=1
michael
David, are the two categories you're talking about both printed on that
weird stock?
Cheers,
Rich
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
My usual fantastic assortment of NO RESERVE auctions is going up tonight.
The usual assortment of high-quality pieces that you've come to expect from
my offerings.
For example, near complete sets on INVASION OF THE SAUCER-MEN. LAWRENCE OF
ARABIA, PSYCHO, and
7th VOYAGE of SINBAD, plus some
Okay I don't know how many Mopo'ers were regular viewers of
Sopranos...but I truly spent my Sundays at 6:00 or 9:00 (East Coast
transmission or
West Coast airing many time both) since its first HBO airing. When between
seasons I turned into a relentless channel switcher looking
(DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN THE SOPRANOS FINALE.)
I'm not so sure, Freeman. Were the familiar hit men you say are
familiar seen in some other context previously? Or were they FBI tails?
The ending is ambiguous and brilliant because of it. Either way -- the
family has been gelded.
Personally I thought the finale was terrible. They wasted half the show
on AJ
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay I don't know how many Mopo'ers were regular viewers of
Sopranos...but I truly spent my Sundays at 6:00 or 9:00 (East
Coast transmission or West Coast airing many time both)
Do not continue if you haven't seen the finale.
David regarding whack or no whackthe main point I was making was
Chase left it shockingly ambiguous. That was what was spellbinding to me. I
think personally it was a race to the finish for Tony's life, either dead
or alive but
Oh no, Freeman, I agree. And wasn't it great? With regard to whether the
FBI had the ability to intercept, that too, is up for debate.
** But it's pretty clear that by the time we reach the ending, everyone
knows that w/the popping of rival gang leader Phil -- that Tony's enemies
have lost
And let's not forget another reason why the Sopranos was great. It left us
with 86 shows since 1999 -- and in my view, only about 20 of 'em could be
called duds (and even those have to be qualified because they weren't
total stinkers). Its detractors rightly were disgusted by the language and
hi all,
im a fairly new mopo'er... why are TV shows being discussed here? is
this common practice to vere SO far off the topic in the public
forum? wouldn't it be better if these discussions/emails were done
between listers--privately-- that wanted or cared about these shows
or topics?
I agree.
The ending was, in my opinion, the T.S. Eliot ending: not with a
bang but a whimper.
We loved it.
Kirby McDaniel
MovieArt
On Jun 10, 2007, at 11:52 PM, David Kusumoto wrote:
And let's not forget another reason why the Sopranos was great. It
left us with 86 shows since 1999
MOPO has allowed some off topic stuff - and occasionally we've gotten
off the range, but most of the members
are pretty good at self-governance. And we have a brilliant shepherd
- Scott - who administers the whole thing.
Whenever I post something other than movie poster patter, I label it
Watch for Soprano the movie.
Dario.
David Kusumoto wrote:
And let's not forget another reason why the Sopranos was great. It
left us with 86 shows since 1999 -- and in my view, only about 20 of
'em could be called duds (and even those have to be qualified
because they weren't total
29 matches
Mail list logo
