2017 7:05 AM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] To back or not to back . . .
I have found that posters that I had backed by some restorers have deteriorated
over the years, developing foxing and other issues. Some of these posters now
need to be rebacked.
I had the sam
> I have found that posters that I had backed by some restorers have
> deteriorated over the years, developing foxing and other issues. Some of
> these posters now need to be rebacked.
I had the same experience, fortunately only with a single onesheet that I
bought from a major dealer in
I had a few hundred posters backed many years ago but rarely get anything
backed these days. I have found that posters that I had backed by some
restorers have deteriorated over the years, developing foxing and other
issues. Some of these posters now need to be rebacked.
I wrote two detailed
day, June 23, 2017 5:06 PM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] To back or not to back . . .
Sounds like we have few fans of backing so far…
But what if the poster is on really fragile paper? I have some Belgian posters
that are in decent shape (no paper loss, no image dama
TSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
> <mailto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU>] On Behalf Of Michael Greenwood
> Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 5:59 PM
> To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU <mailto:MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU>
> Subject: Re: [MOPO] To back or not to back . . .
>
>
> Hello
be linen backed? I can’t recall ever having seen one.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> MoPo List Owner
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* MoPo List [mailto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU] *On Behalf Of
>> *Michael
>> Greenw
? Can lobby
> cards be linen backed? I can’t recall ever having seen one.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Scott
>
> MoPo List Owner
>
>
>
> *From:* MoPo List [mailto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Michael
> Greenwood
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 22, 2017 5:59 PM
> *
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] To back or not to back . . .
Sounds like we have few fans of backing so far.
But what if the poster is on really fragile paper? I have some Belgian
posters that are in decent shape (no paper loss, no image damage), but age
is catching up
ns of guiness you can buy with money you may waste on linenbacking
> h , donuts
>
>
> --
> *From:* MoPo List <mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU> on behalf of Helmut Hamm
> <texasmu...@web.de>
> *Sent:* Friday, June 23, 2017 1:58 PM
_
From: MoPo List <mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
<mailto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU> > on behalf of Tommy Barr
<tommymb...@gmail.com <mailto:tommymb...@gmail.com> >
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 10:11 AM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU <mailto:MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.ED
backing
> h , donuts
>
>
> From: MoPo List <mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU> on behalf of Helmut Hamm
> <texasmu...@web.de>
> Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 1:58 PM
> To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
> Subject: Re: [MOPO] To back or not to back . . .
>
.de>
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 1:58 PM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] To back or not to back . . .
Tommy,
if you like linenbacking, go for it. From an investment aspect, high grade
unbacked posters are a better choice. On the other hand, chances are good that
your poste
el Greenwood
> <newswan...@hotmail.com <mailto:newswan...@hotmail.com>>
> Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 11:59 PM
> To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU <mailto:MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU>
> Subject: Re: [MOPO] To back or not to back . . .
>
>
> Hello
>
>
> No. Why
t:* Thursday, June 22, 2017 11:59 PM
> *To:* MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
> *Subject:* Re: [MOPO] To back or not to back . . .
>
>
>
> Hello
>
>
> No. Why would you want to do that?! If there is extensive physical damage
> you want corrected or you find the fold line
t;newswan...@hotmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 11:59 PM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] To back or not to back . . .
Hello
No. Why would you want to do that?! If there is extensive physical damage you
want corrected or you find the fold lines unbearably distract
List <mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU> on behalf of Tommy Barr
<tommymb...@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 10:11 AM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: [MOPO] To back or not to back . . .
that is the question, so looking for some advice. I have a small Czech poster
that is the question, so looking for some advice. I have a small Czech
poster of Cabaret and an English double crown of Deer Hunter (Russian
roulette style) both in excellent condition, but the paper is quite flimsy.
Should I get these backed for framing?
Tommy
Visit the MoPo Mailing
k required at least), but I have been putting
off having done for many years... who knows if I'll ever get it done?
-- JR
-
Original Message -
From:
Toochis
Morin
To:
MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Sent:
Wednesday, January 05, 2005 0:58
Subject:
Morin
To:
MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Sent:
Wednesday, January 05, 2005 0:58
Subject:
Re: [MOPO] To back or not to back?
That sounds great, JR. One question I do have
thoughis what does one do when they have a window card thatis
hey, the poster is already made
out of paper, so why not back it with more paper?"I'm just guessing
here, though.-- JR
- Original Message -
From:
Ed Flood
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005
10:27
Subject: Re: [MOPO] To back or not
to back?
Why wou
20 matches
Mail list logo
