Adrie
Either way, we can only be disappointed.,to see you leaving the
grid Anthony,in this manner,not a desirable one.
I was so dissapointed when Paul Turner left, still today so,i'll
have to agree with him that this list is becoming a weird environment
---not only for
[djh]
The Dynamic/East context is the same as context 1. The static/West context is
the same as context 2.
[Arlo]
I suggest you take some time and read Northrop's Meeting of East and West.
There is really nothing more I can say to this, David. This context dichotomy
has no value to me, and
Greetings,
I think that Paul Turner's two-context thesis points to the MoQ as a
representation of a budding new level with one aspect rooted in the
intellectual level and one aspect moving beyond it. That there is a great
conflict should not be a surprise because that conflict is what RMP
[Marsha]
I think that Paul Turner's two-context thesis points to the MoQ as a
representation of a budding new level with one aspect rooted in the
intellectual level and one aspect moving beyond it.
[Arlo]
Bo has a discussion forum set up to discuss this. Enjoy.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Arlo,
I don't need to discuss what think, and it has nothing to do with Bo.
Marsha
On Aug 4, 2013, at 12:48 PM, ARLO JAMES BENSINGER JR ajb...@psu.edu wrote:
[Marsha]
I think that Paul Turner's two-context thesis points to the MoQ as a
representation of a budding new level with one
Marsha:
Of course, I want no complaining that I won't discuss what I think. Arlo, what
deep philosophical topic for discussion are you going to present?
On Aug 4, 2013, at 12:56 PM, MarshaV val...@att.net wrote:
Marsha:
I don't need to discuss what I think, and it has nothing to do with
[Marsha]
Of course, I want no complaining that I won't discuss what I think.
[Arlo]
Great use for a philosophy discussion forum.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
Marsha,
And I had asked you, Arlo, what deep philosophical topic were you going to
present for discussion? Your choice of a topic was not very original or deep
or interesting.
On Aug 4, 2013, at 2:05 PM, ARLO JAMES BENSINGER JR ajb...@psu.edu wrote:
[Marsha]
Of course, I want no
[Marsha]
And I had asked you, Arlo, what deep philosophical topic were you going to
present for discussion? Your choice of a topic was not very original or deep
or interesting.
[Arlo]
Not going to play your troll and bait game, Marsha.
YOU made a post referencing what is obviously the SOL
Marsha said:
I think that Paul Turner's two-context thesis points to the MoQ as a
representation of a budding new level with one aspect rooted in the
intellectual level and one aspect moving beyond it.
Arlo replied:
Bo has a discussion forum set up to discuss this. Enjoy.
dmb says:
Hi MashaV and All,
I cannot recognize Dynamic Quality if is is unknowable! Knowledge is
formatted as experience. I experience DQ. There must be a parking space
between undefinable and unknowable. (My computer reacts badly to
undefinable by putting a redline under it whereas indefinable gets
[Arlo previously]
Rather, we get people who have latched onto this rather literally and are using
it to justify two 'competing' views rather than understanding their symbiotic
and synthetic co-occurence as, I think, both Pirsig and Northrop would've
hoped.
[djh]
Do you honestly think Marsha
12 matches
Mail list logo
