I would postulate, that the non-physical difference between man and woman is a
difference in value, to meet their different needs. This subtle variation in
value has trickled down, to larger personal and social differences.
This difference in value, logically, would be derived from the physical
Try this:
Persons are supervenient on their biological and physical bodies -
human, male, female, whatever.
The personality is the sum of historical evolutionary development
of the species, the sex, and the individual. Something like 10%
genetic (species and sex), 40% individual, biological (inc
No secret I've been a big fan of Dan Dennett for many years.
He published his greatest hits in 2013 (called Intuition Pumps)
A recommended read - not least because he's the philosopher that has
successfully and credibly engaged with so many public scientists,
whilst still maintaining his
Hi Richard,
I don't understand the meaning of gross generalization as applied to DQ/SQ
terms? DQ/SQ requires precision in removing the clutter around SQ in
metaphysical reality.
DQ is accepted as indefinable in the common logical perception of
metaphysics dq/sq MOQ.
Physics and Metaphysics!
Joe to Andre:
I do not doubt that there is a physical differentiation between men and
women. Both are sentient beings. What about angels?.
Andre:
Forget about angels Joe.
Joe:
What is the criteria for the differentiated aesthetic continuum? Language?
Andre:
The MoQ is the criteria Joe. The
