Great thinkers think alike...
On Jul 20, 2011, at 4:20 AM, Andre Broersen wrote:
Marsha to Andre:
In the MoQ Texbook Anthony writes that the fundamental nature of the static
is the Dynamic:...
Andre:
So? What point are you making?
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo,
:-)
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 9:28 AM, MarshaV val...@att.net wrote:
Great thinkers think alike...
On Jul 20, 2011, at 4:20 AM, Andre Broersen wrote:
Marsha to Andre:
In the MoQ Texbook Anthony writes that the fundamental nature of the static
is the Dynamic:...
Andre:
So? What point
Marsha to Andre:
Great thinkers think alike...
Andre:
After celebrity status are we? This is a philosophical forum Marsha, not a
popularity contest.
Evasion yet again.
Delete forever.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
Andre,
In the MoQ Texbook Anthony writes that the fundamental nature of the static is
the Dynamic:
Moreover, Nagarjuna (1966, p.251) shares Pirsig’s perception that the
indeterminate (or Dynamic) is the fundamental nature of the conditioned (or
static:.
In their ultimate nature things
Andre,
This seems an interesting way to change the subject of free-will determinism
without dmb conceding to Steve's argument.
Marsha
On Jul 19, 2011, at 3:37 AM, Andre Broersen wrote:
Andre to Dave:
Just another insert Dave. When I talked about Leave it in the weather for a
On Jul 17, 2011, at 2:03 PM, Andre Broersen wrote:
Marsha to dmb:
You sure don't know... Ad hominem attacks, and you say she says he says are
the best you can do.
backing up her:
... Of freewill, determinism and causation, I neither accept them nor reject
them. They are static
Marsha to Andre:
Why would I debate a non-issue? I'll leave it for those want to take a som
point-of-view.
Andre:
See what I mean? You are so predictable. Heroshima and Nagasaki a som issue?
You do not add anything Marsha...you only detract. You may think you are sooo
deep but you represent
