On Jul 17, 2011, at 2:03 PM, Andre Broersen wrote: > Marsha to dmb: > > You sure don't know... Ad hominem attacks, and you say she says he says are > the best you can do. > > backing up her: > ... Of freewill, determinism and causation, I neither accept them nor reject > them. They are static patterns of value, sometimes useful illusions and > sometimes not. As static patterns of value, they are not Ultimately Real. > ... I can only repeat: I neither accept free-will, determinism& causation, > nor reject free-will, determinism& causation; they are static patterns of > value that have at times been considered useful illusions, but are not > Ultimately Real. > > Andre: > The foundation of your snotty behaviour in your bucket is that you appeal to > the 'ultimate' unreality of everything. This makes you nihilistic whilst > pretending to be so smart. Was Heroshima an illusion? Was Nagasaki not real? > Was this also an illusion?
Marsha: No, the question was concerning free-wlll, determinism and causation, not everything. I am not denying them, which would be nihilism. I am neither accepting them nor rejecting (denying) them. > Andre: > I am sure you wriggle out of this as well Marsha, perhaps suggesting it is > not this not that. But you come over to me as a very opportunistic and > therefore dishonest person...blowing with the wind. Marsha: Why would I debate a non-issue? I'll leave it for those want to take a som point-of-view. ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
