Dear Lawry,
Your 27/6 17:51 -0400 post should be an
evaluation of my analogy
Biological/Social/Intellectual evolution can be seen as a
process by which weak Dynamic forces at a subatomic/subcellular/individual level
discover stratagems for overcoming huge static inorganic/biological/social
Dear Dan,
You wrote 28/6 1:13 -0500:
If you really want my advice,
yes. Give up your pursuit [of Dynamic Quality]. It has been my
experience that the 'spirit' which we believe we pursue will find us more
righteous unaware. Just do [static] good.
I agree. The religions I value all
teach
From: Wim Nusselder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MD Relations between levels
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 22:12:29 +0200
I would still like to know to what extent my analogy
Biological/Social/Intellectual evolution can be seen as a process
Hello everyone
From: Wim Nusselder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MD Relations between levels
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 22:12:29 +0200
Dear Dan,
In your 26/6 17:37 -0500 post you counter my disappointment in Pirsig (He
... 'closes up an opening
Greetings, Wim,
Static
patterns can control systems at all levels, big or small, individual or
collective. A subsystem may be the place where dynamic change is launched upon
the larger system to which it belongs, or dynamic change can be initiated at the
level of the system-as-a-whole, and
Hello everyone
From: Wim Nusselder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: MD Relations between levels
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 10:16:19 +0200
Dear Dan,
I renamed the subject, but this is a reply to your 20/6 11:24 -0500 posting
in the True Libertarians
Dear Dan,
I renamed the subject, but this is a
reply to your 20/6 11:24 -0500 posting in the True Libertarians Please Stand
Up-thread.
In my contribution of 16/6 21:59 +0200
I suggested that the different levels evolve in analogous ways:
Biological/Social/Intellectual evolution can be
