Bill May wrote:
David Croley wrote:
Is it just me? I cannot get that awful Flash ad for Oracle on the
my.yahoo.com page to close. Under IE, I think it sets a cookie and
remains closed, but under 0.9.6 and now 0.9.7 (win2k), it won't close.
Maybe a JavaScript or cookie problem?
It's not
What does the @mozilla.org people think about this? I don't recall
ever seeing a single comment about this from any of them.
My three posts are at:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news://news.mozilla.org:119/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news://news.mozilla.org:119/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL
Aaron, Peter Lairo, the rest of you who's arguing to get this feature
removed: I wish you the best of luck. I, however, feel like I'm
wasting my time here, so I'll stop now and do something else. Maybe I
should start whining about Backspace being mapped to Back on Win32
instead - unlike
Peter Lairo wrote:
That argument is silly. You could make the same argument for any of IE's
non-standard (but widely used) features. This whole favicon thing (to
me) goes against all that Mozilla is trying to achieve.
This is a non argument. This is exactly the same non argument that the
To expect Mozilla representatives to be able to evangelize any
significant percentage of these sites to use the link solution is IMO
overly optimistic.
It may be overly optimistic in your opinion, Dave, but why could you not
have adopted the plan I suggested at the beginning? That was
-
On track? I know what the Bugzilla dependency tree looks like, I want to
know how it feels to you guys.
--
http://thingy.apana.org.au/~fun/ http://www.rocknerd.org/
RPGs are the geek equivalent of test cricket. (Barbarella)
*You* thought it was cool. The rest of the world doesn't seem to agree.
What does the @mozilla.org people think about this? I don't recall ever
seeing a single comment about this from any of them.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] discussed this issue at (great) length, and it was
decided that the
jesus X wrote:
Simon P. Lucy wrote:
LetThereBeLight()
light = 1
Customer Requirements Document
--
After consultation, we have discovered that customers prefer darkness,
for energy and cost-saving reasons. This program is therefore entirely
unnecessary.
lake Ross wrote:
This is a petition to fire David Hyatt for his crimes against the World
Wide Web, namely his implementation of automatic favicon retrieval.
Does this involve petrol and matches?
Gerv
Unfortunately, this is the only feedback I have received on Dave for
this focal review period. Sure hope I get some more soon... ;-)
Peter
David Hyatt wrote:
Oooh, I'll sign it! Me! Me!
Blake Ross wrote:
This is a petition to fire David Hyatt for his crimes against the
World Wide Web,
Hi
I downloaded a Mozilla 0.9.7 Port to IRIX 6.5 and searched for a Java plugin
for it.
As expected the netscape 4 plugin from sgi doesn't work.
I searched google for help and didn't find anything.
Is there anybody trying to provide a java-plugin for Mozilla for IRIX 6.5?
If not: How can I
We should certainly pay attention to this in upcoming usability tests.
We still support Alt+Left Arrow, but the objection as I understand it
is the accidental invocation of Back, typically when on a form page with
the focus on the page. I'm not sure I understand in what scenarios this
can be
David Gerard wrote:
On track? I know what the Bugzilla dependency tree looks like, I want to
know how it feels to you guys.
feels like a few more milestones, about 3-4, maybe 5: to give a general
overview from my perspective:
fallouts from patches has created a Mozilla build that
January 10, 2002
You won't believeyour eyes!
Hear your fantasiescome alive
Instant access to hotamateur webcam action
Want to get lucky???Play with them!!!48 Puzzle Pieces
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 09:32:03 +,
Gervase Markham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:jesus X wrote:
: Simon P. Lucy wrote:
:LetThereBeLight()
: light = 1
:Customer Requirements Document
:--
:After consultation, we have discovered that customers prefer darkness,
:for
I keep seeing all these strange messages from somewhere called 4play or
something...
What are they and how can we stop them flooding .general?
download manager still needs to land.
Download manager?
Way cool, no more need to use GetRight (which doesnt want to play nice
with mozilla anyway)
I decided to compare Mozilla with NS 6.2.1. After the install I had to
jigger the Java plug-ins. I am also using a non-standard set of
locations for cache and mail store, requiring a manual edit of the
prefs.js file.
Which leads me to the problem. Suddenly the Mozilla mail client
generates
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I decided to compare Mozilla with NS 6.2.1. After the install I had to
jigger the Java plug-ins. I am also using a non-standard set of
locations for cache and mail store, requiring a manual edit of the
prefs.js file.
Which leads me to the problem. Suddenly the
dman84 wrote:
sidebar in mail/news content is horked,
horked? IMUI, I have no idea what that one means.
Dan Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
dman84 wrote:
sidebar in mail/news content is horked,
horked? IMUI, I have no idea what that one means.
Erm... how about totally messed up?
Dan Howard wrote:
Frank Burleigh wrote:
Starting yesterday (1/9/2002), when moz first starts on XP I get a
Yes, No, Cancel dialog in the upper left corner of my display. Most
of the dialog is offscreen so I don't know what it's asking except the
last part of the question is, , too.
Jonathan Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
download manager still needs to land.
Download manager?
Way cool, no more need to use GetRight
Yes, Netscape's MachV also includes a download manager. Both Mozilla (at
1.0.0?) and Netscape
Blake Ross wrote:
While I 100% agree, there's no need for hyperbole here. Whatever
happens with Mozilla has absolutely no bearing on the good of the Web.
Well, within a 0.75% margin of error.
Hah. I already explained what happens if Mozilla gets embedded. You, of
course, chose to
Gervase Markham wrote:
*You* thought it was cool. The rest of the world doesn't seem to agree.
What does the @mozilla.org people think about this? I don't recall ever
seeing a single comment about this from any of them.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] discussed this issue at (great) length, and it
Jonathan Wilson wrote:
download manager still needs to land.
Download manager?
Read: Ad pump.
Way cool, no more need to use GetRight (which doesnt want to play nice
with mozilla anyway)
David Gerard wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 09:32:03 +,
Gervase Markham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:jesus X wrote:
: Simon P. Lucy wrote:
:LetThereBeLight()
: light = 1
:Customer Requirements Document
:--
:After consultation, we have discovered that
Windows 98 Mozilla 0.9.7+
How can I call up the Profile Manager. On the Mac, there is a program
in the Mozilla folder. I can't find similiar on Windows.
Thanks,
-Jim
I have problems with some Java Applets and the Javasoft JRE.
Is there an alternative JVM to use with Mozilla? The problem is that
many applets are designed to work on IE, so they does not work on the
standard Javasoft Runtime environment.
Thank you for help.
JTK wrote:
Jonathan Wilson wrote:
download manager still needs to land.
Download manager?
Read: Ad pump.
You're think SmartDownload. Have you read the spec for Download Manager?
ian.
Jon Krivitzky wrote:
I wanted a
quick way to see [snip] the Javascript Object version, which doesn't
seem to offer any help at all in the DOM Inspector.
It is possible to inspect the JS DOM objects using the Inspector, it's
just not immediately obvious. Look at the two top panes - the
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Jonathan Wilson wrote:
download manager still needs to land.
Download manager?
Read: Ad pump.
Read: Hey, let's go on bashing Mozilla!
Blake Ross wrote:
That might be true right now. But what about a year from now when
Mozilla has 40% market share?
Gosh, I hope not. Mozilla isn't a distribution, so 40% of internet users
wouldn't have any technical support at their disposal.
When I talk about Mozilla's market share, I
Title: Free Quote
Double Your Life Insurance For
FREE
$300,000 policy
for $3.50 per month
CLICK HERE FOR A FREE ONLINE QUOTE
In article a1mtd6$[EMAIL PROTECTED], Sören Kuklau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Jonathan Wilson wrote:
download manager still needs to land.
Download manager?
Read: Ad pump.
Read: Hey, let's go on
Mike Koenecke [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
In article a1mtd6$[EMAIL PROTECTED], Sören Kuklau
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Jonathan Wilson wrote:
Dan Howard wrote:
dman84 wrote:
sidebar in mail/news content is horked,
horked? IMUI, I have no idea what that one means.
http://www.acronymfinder.com/af-query.asp?String=wildcardAcronym=imuiFind=Find:
Sorry, imui was not found in the database.
Jonathan Wilson wrote:
I keep seeing all these strange messages from somewhere called 4play or
something...
What are they and how can we stop them flooding .general?
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63735
--
/Jonas
Just to clarify for all those googling in the future:
If you have only one profile, mozilla starts with it and never brings
up profile manager. There is no way to start profile manager from the
mozilla menu. Under windows, you go to Start - Run then type in
mozilla -ProfileManager
I have
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Yeh You-Ying wrote:
Hello,
While composing with HTML format, if I insert image without fill in
Alternative Text,
An alert warning pops up. Is is possible to provide a way to disable
this warning message
in the future release ?
From the HTML 4.01 DTD:
alt
Gervase Markham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
To expect Mozilla representatives to be able to evangelize any
significant percentage of these sites to use the link solution is IMO
overly optimistic.
It may be overly optimistic in your
Johnny Yen wrote:
Maybe I'm missing the point here, but given the choice between adding link
rel=icon to hundreds of pages or simple dropping a favicon in the root,
I'll take the favicon.
Do you really have a website with hundreds of *static* pages?
--
/Jonas
Ben Goodger wrote:
You needed two lines of code to do a web browser? I'm unimpressed. I can
do it in one:
beAWebBrowser();
More proof that Mozilla is bloated
;-)
That's nothing, I can write an OS in three:
do {
TheRightThing();
} until (time == MTBF);
How many non-AOL employees were involved in that decision? Mozilla *is*
still an Open project, right?
You can see the makeup of [EMAIL PROTECTED] from our web pages. I can't
recall exactly who attended that particular meeting; as it was a heated
one, perhaps others can.
Gerv
Marketing: we need a big push for customers to prefer light, so we can sell
them something.
Engineering: we are currently overloaded providing darkness; there's no
way we can provide light as well. Suggest marketing attempt to sell more
darkness, as it's a zero-cost resource.
Gerv
Maybe the point of whatever line of argument you and your like-minded
posters are pushing, but not the point of the feature.
/favicon.ico offers convenience for web masters, and both
implementations result in convenience for the user.
What site author is going to go to the trouble of even
JTK wrote:
How many non-AOL employees were involved in that decision? Mozilla *is*
still an Open project, right?
Of course, but open does not mean that everyone gets what they want. Some
decisions really are binary, and thus mutually exclusive.
--
jesus X [ Booze-fueled paragon of pointless
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 07:19:37 -0500,
Dan Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:dman84 wrote:
: sidebar in mail/news content is horked,
:horked? IMUI, I have no idea what that one means.
'broken', 'non-functional', 'corrupted', etc.
--
http://thingy.apana.org.au/~fun/
On 11 Jan 2002 14:59:08 GMT,
Mike Koenecke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:In article a1mtd6$[EMAIL PROTECTED], Sören Kuklau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:writes:
:JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
: Jonathan Wilson wrote:
: download manager still needs
There is no README or INSTALL nor any form of instructions on how to
install the mozilla linux builds from tarball. I have tried just
unpacking the archive and running the mozilla exectuable, but this
technique results in a brain damaged mozilla: the text in some UI
buttons does not show up!
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], David Gerard wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 19:24:57 +,
Gervase Markham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: :Customer Requirements Document
: :--
: :After consultation, we have discovered that customers prefer darkness,
: :for energy and
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 19:14:57 +0100,
Jonas Jørgensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:Johnny Yen wrote:
: Maybe I'm missing the point here, but given the choice between adding link
: rel=icon to hundreds of pages or simple dropping a favicon in the root,
: I'll take the favicon.
:Do you really have a
Gervase Markham wrote:
How many non-AOL employees were involved in that decision? Mozilla *is*
still an Open project, right?
You can see the makeup of [EMAIL PROTECTED] from our web pages.
No I can't. All I see is a list of contributors' names. And mine
strangely seems to be
See the cnet article about Mozilla being embedded in a beta version of
Compuserve.
I work for Netscape, so there's nothing I can say about anything, but I
do rest assured that I know more about what's going on than you.
Blake
JTK wrote:
Blake Ross wrote:
While I 100% agree, there's no
Wow, you know more about download manager than the person implementing
it! :-)
See the spec, http://mozilla.org/xpapps/MachVPlan/DownloadMgr.html. I
don't see any space for an ad in the UI, right now anyway (at no point
would it affect Mozilla if such a thing did get implemented).
Blake
JTK
How many non-AOL employees were involved in that decision? Mozilla *is*
still an Open project, right?
Right.
Right?
Right (again). Of the fourteen people on
http://mozilla.org/about/stafflist.html#Staff-Members, exactly half are
not employed by AOL.
You know, you've really lost
David Gerard wrote:
On 11 Jan 2002 14:59:08 GMT,
Mike Koenecke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:In article a1mtd6$[EMAIL PROTECTED], Sören Kuklau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:writes:
:JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
: Jonathan Wilson wrote:
:
David Gerard wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 19:14:57 +0100,
Jonas Jørgensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:Johnny Yen wrote:
: Maybe I'm missing the point here, but given the choice between adding link
: rel=icon to hundreds of pages or simple dropping a favicon in the root,
: I'll take the
Ben Goodger wrote:
/favicon.ico offers convenience for web masters, and both
implementations result in convenience for the user.
What site author is going to go to the trouble of even updating all his
or her templates (there's bound to be more than one, I consider
mozilla.org a very
Oh, wait, you mean
http://www.mozilla.org/about/stafflist.html#Staff-Members. Yeah, not
real clear there who's paid AOL muscle and who ain't.
Well, er, if you'd really like to know, see my other post where I gave
the numbers. Anyway, it generally doesn't say what company anyone works
Am I the only one who doesn't want to touch print preview with a ten
foot pole? On my win32 nightly, the print preview is shown with some
weird scrollbars and a black border on the top, bottom, and left, but
not right side, which looks weird. Also, I'm not sure how you're
supposed to exit
Ben Ruppel (slate) wrote:
Am I the only one who doesn't want to touch print preview with a ten
foot pole? On my win32 nightly, the print preview is shown with some
weird scrollbars and a black border on the top, bottom, and left, but
not right side, which looks weird. Also, I'm not sure
What version of mozilla are you using? It's definitely horked on win32
builds dated january 11th. I just crashed it again by hitting back.
The page layout doesn't complete and I can't scroll vertically
sometimes. I don't get a black border all around.
cr wrote:
Ben Ruppel (slate) wrote:
Ben Ruppel wrote:
What version of mozilla are you using? It's definitely horked on win32
builds dated january 11th. I just crashed it again by hitting back. The
page layout doesn't complete and I can't scroll vertically sometimes. I
don't get a black border all around.
Instead of
Title: ClubOnline.com
Liked this email? Forward it to your friends!
NOTE: This is not SPAM! This email was sent to you because your email was entered on a website requesting to be a registered subscriber. If you did not request
On 11 Jan 2002 20:47:59 GMT,
Chris Hoess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], David Gerard wrote:
: On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 19:24:57 +,
: Gervase Markham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:: :Customer Requirements Document
:: :--
:: :After consultation, we
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 15:01:03 -0600,
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:David Gerard wrote:
: He's not useless, just, ahh, socially retarded.
:How 'bout let's try: Not afraid to loudly ask the questions the Man
:doesn't want asked.
Nah, I think socially retarded covers it. You're certainly not
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 15:03:06 -0600,
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:David Gerard wrote:
: On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 19:14:57 +0100,
: Jonas Jørgensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: :Johnny Yen wrote:
: : Maybe I'm missing the point here, but given the choice between adding link
: : rel=icon to hundreds of
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 17:38:26 -0500,
Dan Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:Ben Ruppel wrote:
: What version of mozilla are you using? It's definitely horked on win32
: builds dated january 11th. I just crashed it again by hitting back. The
: page layout doesn't complete and I can't scroll
On 11 Jan 2002 23:32:28 GMT,
David Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 17:38:26 -0500,
:Dan Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
::Ben Ruppel wrote:
:: What version of mozilla are you using? It's definitely horked on win32
:: builds dated january 11th. I just crashed it again by
On 11 Jan 2002 23:58:36 GMT,
Glenn Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:Some drink from the Fountain of Knowledge; and yet the Tree of Life is
:also the choice of some. However, on 12 Jan 2002, David Gerard (amongst
:others) drank deeply from netscape.public.mozilla.general and the
:following
David Gerard wrote:
On 11 Jan 2002 23:32:28 GMT,
David Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 17:38:26 -0500,
:Dan Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
::Ben Ruppel wrote:
:: What version of mozilla are you using? It's definitely horked on win32
:: builds dated january 11th.
On 10 Jan 2002 05:12:17 GMT, DeMoN LaG n@a wrote:
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in news:3C3D18E0.DBAC2447
@hgdjaggd.com, on 09 Jan 2002:
DeMoN LaG wrote:
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 09 Jan 2002:
That's what the cancel button is arguably
Yes, the problem is that hitting it crashes mozilla (at least on my system).
Christopher Rued wrote:
David Gerard wrote:
On 11 Jan 2002 23:32:28 GMT,
David Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 17:38:26 -0500,
:Dan Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
::Ben Ruppel wrote:
::
Title: Untitled Document
ÃßõÀÎ 20¸í¸¸ ¸ðÀ¸¸é Á¤¸» ¸¸¿øÀ» µå¸³´Ï´Ù.
´Ü ÀÚ½ÅÀÇ 2´Ü°è,3´Ü°è,4´Ü°è Ãßõȸ¿øµéµµ °¢°¢ 20¸í¾¿ ¸ð¾Æ¾ß ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
ÇÏÁö¸¸ °ÆÁ¤ÇÏÁö ¸¶¼¼¿ä. Å丶Åä°É ÆÄÆ®³Ê½± ÇÁ·Î±×·¥¿¡¼´Â ÀÚ½ÅÀÇ ÇÏÀ§ÃßõÀÎÁ¤º¸¸¦ º¼ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¹Ç·Î
On 12 Jan 2002 00:23:47 GMT,
Christopher Rued [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:David Gerard wrote:
: On 11 Jan 2002 23:32:28 GMT,
: David Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: :Ooh, ouch. I'm on 2002010803 with a fresh profile (created four hours ago).
: :Just went to 'Print Preview' from the Print button
On Sat, 12 Jan 2002 11:18:24 +1030,
David Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:On 10 Jan 2002 05:12:17 GMT, DeMoN LaG n@a wrote:
:I've never hit cancel before, and Mozilla cleans up all it's temp stuff
:when I close it so I don't know if it deletes it on the spot or not.
:Shouldn't be hard for
And it came to pass that Francesco wrote:
I have problems with some Java Applets and the Javasoft JRE.
Is there an alternative JVM to use with Mozilla? The problem
is that many applets are designed to work on IE, so they
does not work on the standard Javasoft Runtime environment.
Thank you
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
It offers convenience for *some* webmasters. What about those who have
their site on http://some.free.hosting.provider/~my_free_account?
They'll all get their hosting providers favicon because of this.
In those cases, you use the link tag to add your favicon.
--
jesus
Blake Ross wrote:
I work for Netscape, so there's nothing I can say about anything, but I
do rest assured that I know more about what's going on than you.
Well, I know almost as much as you do, and IU don't work for NS, but I decided
to be nice and not spill all the beans. But I'll be damned
And it came to pass that Peter Moeller wrote:
Sorry, if its not the right place for posting. Didn't find
any better.
Want to import my mail (Netscape V4.x) from an old CD
Backup. (these files with .snm suffix), but there's no
support, isn't it?
What can I do now? You've got a hint?
jesus X wrote:
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
It offers convenience for *some* webmasters. What about those who have
their site on http://some.free.hosting.provider/~my_free_account?
They'll all get their hosting providers favicon because of this.
I said Just ignore this message, didn't I? ;)
Not
David Gerard wrote:
On 12 Jan 2002 00:23:47 GMT,
Christopher Rued [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:David Gerard wrote:
: On 11 Jan 2002 23:32:28 GMT,
: David Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: :Ooh, ouch. I'm on 2002010803 with a fresh profile (created four hours ago).
: :Just went to 'Print
I've read that Doctypes determine whether or not Mozilla goes into
quirks mode. I went to this site that explains it:
http://www.hut.fi/u/hsivonen/doctype
I've found that this web page:
http://www.askmen.com/jokes/index.html
uses:
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Draft//EN
The
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
Not that you replied
That should of course be *now* that you replied... duh... too much
work, too little sleep... ;-)
--
/Jonas
Randy Slemko wrote:
I've read that Doctypes determine whether or not Mozilla goes into
quirks mode. I went to this site that explains it:
http://www.hut.fi/u/hsivonen/doctype
I've found that this web page:
http://www.askmen.com/jokes/index.html
uses:
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC
msg14704/bin0.bin
Description: multipart
87 matches
Mail list logo
