Ben Goodger wrote: > /favicon.ico offers convenience for web masters, and both > implementations result in convenience for the user. > > What site author is going to go to the trouble of even updating all his > or her templates (there's bound to be more than one, I consider > mozilla.org a very simple case) simply to add this in? First operation: > drop in ico file. Second operation: drop in image file & link up at > least one template, more like 3-4 or several hundred.
It offers convenience for *some* webmasters. What about those who have their site on http://some.free.hosting.provider/~my_free_account? They'll all get their hosting providers favicon because of this. Oh, that's right, I decided earlier in this thread to stop yelling about this and learn to live with it. Just ignore this message, then. -- /Jonas
