family before I murdered myself. I wouldn't even think of living in that
society. Neither would I think of living in a country where a farmer with a
Just a notion: only people from the so-called western block are
discussing the evils of communism here. You people must've been even
worse off
Raivo Hool wrote:
family before I murdered myself. I wouldn't even think of living in that
society. Neither would I think of living in a country where a farmer with a
Just a notion: only people from the so-called western block are
discussing the evils of communism here.
Yeah, well,
hristian Biesinger wrote:
For all interested parties, the fetching of /favicon.ico has been
disabled. Neither 0.9.8 nor nightly builds will automatically fetch that
file.
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120949
I think this was The Right Thing to do, altough the small icons
TGOS wrote:
The best test page for CSS is still:
http://www.w3c.org/Style/CSS/
Mozilla always displayed this page correctly since the day I went there
for the first time. In the past this page was horrible slow (you could
nearly see the page building up after a scroll
i'm using winxpro with mozilla 0.97.
how can i change the default cache
directory of mozilla to somewhere
else?
ray
On Sat, 19 Jan 2002 17:14:55 +0100, gavin long wrote:
A bug, whose number escapes me right now. Fixed in the recent
nightlies, and the fix should be in 0.9.8.
This is bug 115148 http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115148
--
Gilles
Just a thought, do you boycott Heineken for the same reason?
S
JTK wrote:
*blush* Well come on now, I can't take ALL the credit on this one; I'm
not even the one who first complained about it! The important thing is
that widespread outrage got it changed (not eliminated, but at least
effectively eliminated). Eventually maybe that will even get the
JTK kirjutas niiviisi:
browser. They get enough of that from The State.
What State? The State of Unconsciousness? I must have missed out on
that, being born in the Soviet Union under the Brezhnev rule and having
lived in the country until its demise.
Whatagram? What are you blabbering
TGOS wrote:
[ http://w3.org/Style/CSS in non-mozilla browsers ]
and the edges of the large, white
text-boxes weren't round in Opera either
See the lines for this in the css file:
|/* border-radius is not a CSS property, but a proposal for CSS3.
| * Mozilla has implemented it in an experimental
Christopher Jahn said:
And it came to pass that Trevor Smithson wrote:
In Internet Explorer, you can type a word into the address
bar, hit ctrl-enter, and the http://www.com is
automatically filled in.
But what if the site ISN'T on the World Wide Web? I have some
links that won't
Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 21 Jan 2002:
JTK wrote:
*blush* Well come on now, I can't take ALL the credit on this
one; I'm not even the one who first complained about it! The
important thing is that widespread outrage got it
Flo Ledermann said:
why is this bug not in 1.0?
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33654
a textarea specified as having 1 row rendered as 3 rows is a serious
issue, IMHO. I thought those were exactly the bugs that have to be
cleared pre-1.0.
The bug was moved to Mozilla 1.0.1
I found this interesting article on penis development:
Amazing excersise system to improve your sex life, increase your
penis size, and help to reduce the risk of prostate cancer
The cost is less than $40.00 and seems good value, please if you intend on looking at
this link,
I will let you
Hello,
I have encountered what I think is a classic (common?) NN bug:
When users use the back button in my sites, NN4.x does not return to
the previous scroll position of the original page.
I have read all over Bugzilla and elsewhere, and I cannot seem to find
a definitive answer with regard
TGOS wrote:
Today I checked Konqueror, the KDE file and WWW browser. The browser
isn't bad, fast render engine (also very fast JavaScript support) and
could display most test pages without a single flaw, however it also
fails at this page. The menu is static, transparent and in the upper
On 01/21/02 04:20 AM, Cheng, Yui Pang wrote:
i'm using winxpro with mozilla 0.97.
how can i change the default cache
directory of mozilla to somewhere
else?
ray
Use the following pref
// To set you cache directory to something other than the default
// which is profile-dir/cache.
//
The only browser that can render it correctly, is a Mozilla or
Mozilla-based browser.
Even mozilla doesn't get it right. I usually get the page all squished
to the left or the sidebar is missing. It's different every time. I
have to keep hitting reload until it fixes itself. Build
On starting up Mozilla, it appears that Mozilla can't find my user account's
profile folder. What currently happens, and has had to happen since I've
been using this Win2K desktop is I have to 'create' a new profile in my
profile's folder everytime I start up. This has problems in that
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002 00:39:24 +, Rich Doughty
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am behind a firewall, but should this really matter?! I'm using the
built-in client to access my netscape.net email and I can't access the
account, nor can I send mail etc using this client. It works fine via the
On Sat, 19 Jan 2002 16:29:58 -0500, WDA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christopher Rued wrote:
On 2002.01.19 12:58 Daniel R. Tobias wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to read mail as text and not HTML?
I don't think there's a way to do that in Mozilla,
Which brings up the
David Simpson wrote:
I'm obviously not one of your clients then. The only HTML mail I
receive is SPAM and I don't want that at all. Plain text for me every
day.
I almost scream out in disgust when I recieve html mail,
or read a html post to usenet.
--
Morten Nilsen, aka Dr. P
We are the
And it came to pass that Vic Joseph wrote:
The actual messages concerned are
'Please enter a username for news server access'
and
'Please enter a password for news server access'
Sometimes cancelling the messages seems to be sufficient,
but sometimes they keep repeating (depending on the
grow, but missed some of the features of Netscape 6.2.1, although I
could not get the standard download to function correctly, so I was
primarily using Mozilla until I went to www.sillydog.org and installed
the streamlined version of Netscape 6.2.1, it performs wonderfully! I
also had
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002 03:12:18 +1030, David Simpson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm obviously not one of your clients then. The only HTML mail I
receive is SPAM and I don't want that at all. Plain text for me every
day.
Thank you YES
I also think that the HTML opens you up to certain
Christopher Rued wrote:
On 2002.01.19 12:58 Daniel R. Tobias wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to read mail as text and not HTML?
I don't think there's a way to do that in Mozilla,
Which brings up the question: Why not?
Simple: Because mobody happened to implement it yet.
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002 01:27:36 -0600, JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Note that this is the exact same release method that made the Netscape
6.0 rollout so successful.
So we should wait till it's PERFECT?
Yea Thats smart!
And it came to pass that JS wrote:
I had been installing Mozilla builds for some time,
watching 0.9.7+
grow, but missed some of the features of Netscape 6.2.1,
although I could not get the standard download to function
correctly, so I was primarily using Mozilla until I went to
And it came to pass that wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002 01:27:36 -0600, JTK
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note that this is the exact same release method that made
the Netscape 6.0 rollout so successful.
So we should wait till it's PERFECT?
Yea Thats smart!
No, we should wait until
How do we get rid of these SPAM messages?
Tri
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2002 3:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: breasts 1929
I love
Ian Hickson wrote:
JTK wrote:
*blush* Well come on now, I can't take ALL the credit on this one; I'm
not even the one who first complained about it! The important thing is
that widespread outrage got it changed (not eliminated, but at least
effectively eliminated). Eventually maybe
Raivo Hool wrote:
JTK kirjutas niiviisi:
browser. They get enough of that from The State.
What State? The State of Unconsciousness? I must have missed out on
that, being born in the Soviet Union under the Brezhnev rule and having
lived in the country until its demise.
AH! So
Flo Ledermann wrote:
c'mon, shut up. i didn't post that here to give you another opportunity
for point- and idealess bitching.
Or to hear the truth apparently.
so would you please hold it now.
You heard Jonas: April 5, 2002. Think it'll be soup by then?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002 01:27:36 -0600, JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Note that this is the exact same release method that made the Netscape
6.0 rollout so successful.
So we should wait till it's PERFECT?
Nope. Just 'til it's competitive with IE.
Oh wait,
In 4.7, in the mail window, I went to menu and clicked on Communicator, then
Bookmarks. Is there an equivalent in 6.2?
Fulvio Perini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Alex wrote:
In Netscape 4.7, from the mail window, I could access bookmarks
In 4.7, in the mail window, I went to menu and clicked on Communicator, then
Bookmarks. Is there an equivalent in 6.2?
Fulvio Perini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Alex wrote:
In Netscape 4.7, from the mail window, I could access bookmarks
In 4.7, in the mail window, I went to menu and clicked on Communicator, then
Bookmarks. Is there an equivalent in 6.2?
Fulvio Perini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Alex wrote:
In Netscape 4.7, from the mail window, I could access bookmarks
In 4.7, in the mail window, I went to menu and clicked on Communicator, then
Bookmarks. Is there an equivalent in 6.2?
Fulvio Perini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Alex wrote:
In Netscape 4.7, from the mail window, I could access bookmarks
JTK wrote:
Flo Ledermann wrote:
c'mon, shut up. i didn't post that here to give you another
opportunity for point- and idealess bitching.
Or to hear the truth apparently.
Truth's out there eh?
Sounds like you wanna become Priest (sp?).
so would you please hold it now.
You heard Jonas:
JTK wrote:
Sören Kuklau wrote:
Truth's out there eh?
Must be, sure ain't much in here.
No, often not.
Sounds like you wanna become Priest (sp?).
Pope actually.
Pope Jay Tee Kay the twenty-seventh?
I love to eat chicken soup. Won't have any problem with it being that.
How does lizard
Dear all,
Have a brief search on the net about the support of JPEG push
on mozilla...
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=push+jpeg+group:netscape.public.mozilla.*hl=enselm=948902660.559359%40unix.cboss.comrnum=1
It's been almost a year after that e-mail and I'm
Preferences-Advanced, uncheck Enable Javascript for Mail and
Newsgroups. Unless I am missing something, I have never heard of a
vulnerability that can be exploited without javascript...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002 03:12:18 +1030, David Simpson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pigeon wrote:
Dear all,
Have a brief search on the net about the support of JPEG push
on mozilla...
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=push+jpeg+group:netscape.public.mozilla.*hl=enselm=948902660.559359%40unix.cboss.comrnum=1
It's been almost a year after that e-mail
Alex wrote:
In 4.7, in the mail window, I went to menu and clicked on Communicator, then
Bookmarks. Is there an equivalent in 6.2?
And you thought this was such a gem of interest you posted it four times? :)
--
Morten Nilsen, aka Dr. P
We are the borg^]dbdbiMicrosoft.
Prepare to be
Sören Kuklau wrote:
Pigeon wrote:
Dear all,
Have a brief search on the net about the support of JPEG push
on mozilla...
[snip]
I've found a bug about it:
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on
21 Jan 2002:
Nope. Just 'til it's competitive with IE.
Seems to me it's already competitive with IE, seeing how it was rated
above IE6 on Windows 2000 by both ZDNet and CNet in terms of speed and
usability. So by
WHAT THEY DON'T WANT YOU TO KNOW: you can get something for nothing
The easy way to gain access to the top adult paysites for FREE!
If you're a web surfer into adult sites, you should know how this
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 21 Jan 2002:
This answer posted via Mozilla's newsreader, to prove to Mr. Kuklau
that there's a long distance between barely functional and
working properly, and an even longer distance between working
properly and
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 05:00:56PM -0500, Travis Crump wrote:
Preferences-Advanced, uncheck Enable Javascript for Mail and
Newsgroups. Unless I am missing something, I have never heard of a
vulnerability that can be exploited without javascript...
What about those annoying spam
JTK wrote:
Raivo Hool wrote:
JTK kirjutas niiviisi:
browser. They get enough of that from The State.
What State? The State of Unconsciousness? I must have missed out on
that, being born in the Soviet Union under the Brezhnev rule and
having lived in the country until its demise.
Apologies. I started using Outlook Express and it kept giving me an error
message when I posted it, so I didn't think it had posted. Apparently, it
had. Therefore, no, I do not think it is a gem of interest.
Morten Nilsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL
Neil M. wrote:
The only browser that can render it correctly, is a Mozilla or
Mozilla-based browser.
Even mozilla doesn't get it right. I usually get the page all squished
to the left or the sidebar is missing. It's different every time. I
have to keep hitting reload until it fixes
Ah Christ here comes another one:
Patrick Gallagher wrote:
[snip]
Hopefully, although the feigned ignorance it's just a symbol! crowd
never gets tiresome. Lord.
my, my... he just squashed your argument like a big juicy bug...
BAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAA Yep, he
Alright, I guess it's up to Ol' JTK to solve yet another one of the
bottomless cup o' problems that is Mozilla.
We all know that Mozilla's communism-glorifying graphics, in particular
the main about screen that comes up by default when you start Mozilla
(that is when it doesn't mysteriously
If Your Current Mortgage Rate Is Higher Than 6% or IF YOU HAVE ANY DEBT.
We Can Reduce Your Monthly Payments in Half and Provide One Low Monthly Payment...
GUARANTEED... Compare Your Rate Instantly To See How Much We Can Save You...
If You Like What You See. We Will Have up to 5 Lenders
Hi guys: I'm not a programmer, just trying to get away from MS
Installed Nav.6 but when I open it, it does not start up the DUN. To use it I
have to start DUN and then open Nav. There must be a better way.
Also, what is the best newsgroup for a beginner like me?
TIA
--
Walt Stanley
Skeptics
Is there a way to print to a file from the command-line, turning mozilla
into a powerful html2ps program ?
Or would it be possible to have Mozilla running in the background, and using
a -remote command to have it print something ?
If neither option is possible, what kind of work would
Daniel R. Tobias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] for curmudgeons like me who still think that
plain text email with lines of no more than 70 characters and hard
line breaks between them, and replies written after a carefully
trimmed quote preceded with angle brackets and followed by a
dman84 wrote:
Neil M. wrote:
The only browser that can render it correctly, is a Mozilla or
Mozilla-based browser.
Even mozilla doesn't get it right. I usually get the page all
squished to the left or the sidebar is missing. It's different every
time. I have to keep hitting
J B wrote:
On starting up Mozilla, it appears that Mozilla can't find my user account's
profile folder. What currently happens, and has had to happen since I've
been using this Win2K desktop is I have to 'create' a new profile in my
profile's folder everytime I start up. This has problems in
Walt Stanley wrote:
Hi guys: I'm not a programmer, just trying to get away from MS
Installed Nav.6 but when I open it, it does not start up the DUN. To use it I
have to start DUN and then open Nav. There must be a better way.
Also, what is the best newsgroup for a beginner like me?
TIA
Neil M. wrote:
dman84 wrote:
Neil M. wrote:
The only browser that can render it correctly, is a Mozilla or
Mozilla-based browser.
Even mozilla doesn't get it right. I usually get the page all
squished to the left or the sidebar is missing. It's different every
time. I have to
CaT wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 07:23:39PM -0600, JTK wrote:
Flood fill the commie star with blue and white instead of red and gold.
And I want this blatant expression of capitalism because?
I like red and gold. :-)
--
This post written in MozillaNews, to prove JTK that it indeed
Sören Kuklau wrote:
CaT wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 07:23:39PM -0600, JTK wrote:
Flood fill the commie star with blue and white instead of red and gold.
And I want this blatant expression of capitalism because?
I like red and gold. :-)
I forgot: Is JTK Blue Capitalist? ;-)
--
On 01/21/2002 9:31 PM, Walt Stanley wrote:
what is the best newsgroup for a beginner like me?
TIA
Walt,
Since you're using Netscape 6.2, the best place to ask questions is in
the Netscape 6 newsgroup. You can subscribe to the groups quickly from
the UFAQ website:
JTK wrote:
Ah Christ here comes another one:
Patrick Gallagher wrote:
[snip]
Hopefully, although the feigned ignorance it's just a symbol! crowd
never gets tiresome. Lord.
my, my... he just squashed your argument like a big juicy bug...
Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 05:00:56PM -0500, Travis Crump wrote:
Preferences-Advanced, uncheck Enable Javascript for Mail and
Newsgroups. Unless I am missing something, I have never heard of a
vulnerability that can be exploited without javascript...
What
67 matches
Mail list logo
