¯S§O³ø§i¡A¦³ÓÁÈ¿ú¤èªk´£¨ÑÚ§A§r¡I Ãø¥H¸m«H¡A¤Ñ¤U¶¡Ã䦳§K¶O¤ÈÀ\¬[¡H
¸Ü»¡ ¤é ¤é ¦nµL²áËݹL¡A°_¨µ¥°Vı¡Aªð¾Çµ¥©ñ¾Ç¡A¬P´Á¤@µ¥¬P´Á¤¡A ¾îÕi±o¶¢¡A
¤Wºô ݯ ¨ì Ó ø ¬~n¨¥÷µýnumber¡Aø¬~¦¬·|¶O¡A ¥un¦³Ó¦a§}¡A¹q¸Ü¸¹½X´NÁȨì
¿úo¬Jºô¯¸¡A ¸ò ¦í¥Ó ½Ð¦¨¬°·|û¡K¡K (¤Ï¥¿ÁÈø¨ì¿ú¤Sø·|¬ª©è¡A«}¥Ó½Ðoù¡I)µ¥¥ª
David Gerard wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jan 2002 20:48:12 -0500,
jesus X [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:Sören Kuklau wrote:
: What's that strange Mozilla logo font?
: http://www.mozillanews.org/images/icons/mozdotorg.png has it, for example.
: Would like to use it for some Moz-related stuff I'm
grayrest wrote:
Yeh You-Ying wrote:
Hello,
I just downlaod and install the latest release.
I found it's Mozilla 0.9.8+...But I never saw the announcement recently.
I would like to know when the 0.9.8 release...
Thanks a lot.
0.9.8 branched last week, that's why the trunk is 0.9.8+.
Hi,
there's that temporary Mail notification icon in (at least) the Win32
trunk nightlies. I'd like to know where it is stored. Couldn't find it
in mozilla.exe ressources, nor in the /chrome/icons/default/ folder.
--
Regards,
Sören Kuklau ('Chucker')
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Travis Crump wrote:
http://mozdev.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=668
Roope Lehmuslehto wrote:
I just noticed that Optimoz causes Mozilla to slow considerably,
especially opening new windows, is there any solution for this,
because that is _very_ annoying when opening new window takes ~4
Holden Caulfield wrote:
When I try to log into Yahoo, on submission
of usr/pwd, I get an Unknown socket type. Loading aborted error.
Install PSM (Personal Security Manager).
If you're using Mozilla 0.9.7, you can do that by visiting this url and
clicking OK in the install dialog that comes
DeMoN LaG wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Gerard) wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 28 Jan 2002:
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122083
Ok, does anyone have any clue what is happening with this bug? I have
no idea how this would come up in
Sören Kuklau wrote:
there's that temporary Mail notification icon in (at least) the Win32
trunk nightlies. I'd like to know where it is stored.
mozilla/mailnews/base/build/newmail.ico
What do you mean with temporary?
--
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
Under windows the recommendation is to uninstall mozilla before
installing a new version (e.g. 0.9.6 to 0.9.7). Under Linux using RPMs
what is the procedure? Do you rpm -e current_mozilla first and then rpm
-ivh new_mozilla or is it ok to simply upgrade using rpm -U?
Hello!
My party... It was absolutely amazing!
I have attached my web page with new photos!
If you can please make color prints of my photos. Thanks!
begin 666 www.myparty.yahoo.com
M35J0``,$__\``+@`0```
If Your Current Mortgage Rate Is Higher Than 6% or IF YOU HAVE ANY DEBT.
We Can Reduce Your Monthly Payments in Half and Provide One Low Monthly Payment...
GUARANTEED... Compare Your Rate Instantly To See How Much We Can Save You...
If You Like What You See. We Will Have up to 5 Lenders
What programming languages does Netscape use to program
Navigator/Communicatior v6?
Is it Java or C/C++? Do you have any references to back this up?
If you know any good sites which detail this please reply
Sorry for being so vague.
Try to help.
--
Thanks lots
Hi
I must write some web pages for the Nokia Media Terminal which is
using Mozilla 0.9.5. But the Page setup option is missing. So by
default the printed pages will have a margin and in all 4 corners of
the page will be printed also the name of the page, the url of the
page, the page number and
On Sat, 26 Jan 2002 18:10:26 -0500, Travis Crump
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
grayrest wrote:
It probably happened in the installation process, I know that mozilla
doesn't do that when it installs, but anyway. (assuming you're in windows)
Mozilla probably did take it during installation and
David Gerard wrote:
COMMIES! COMMIES EVERYWHERE!
OMG! They got my computer!!11
:-D
inline: hambone1.jpg
On Sun, 27 Jan 2002 01:20:08 -0600, JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[1] Do they even teach you kids Civics anymore? Do the schools even
have classes anymore? Or is that what I'm running up against here, a
feral generation of filthy, uneducated teenagers?
You're talking about Americans here
SomeoneSpecial wrote:
What programming languages does Netscape use to program
Navigator/Communicatior v6?
Is it Java or C/C++? Do you have any references to back this up?
http://www.mozilla.org/
Or, if you want to go straight to the source code,
http://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/
John wrote:
Under windows the recommendation is to uninstall mozilla before
installing a new version (e.g. 0.9.6 to 0.9.7). Under Linux using RPMs
what is the procedure? Do you rpm -e current_mozilla first and then
rpm -ivh new_mozilla or is it ok to simply upgrade using rpm -U?
rpm -U
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
My party... It was absolutely amazing! I have attached my web page
with new photos! If you can please make color prints of my photos.
Thanks!
In case you missed it, the attachment to the original message is a
virus, as reported in the Washington
and I got rid of the undesired text...but the margins still exist.
I need to print clean pages, without any margins and without any
additional text.
Has any of you a solution for this?
You may be out of luck. At the 0.9.5 stage, our printing wasn't brilliant.
In any case, this is probably
Christian Biesinger wrote:
Sören Kuklau wrote:
there's that temporary Mail notification icon in (at least) the Win32
trunk nightlies. I'd like to know where it is stored.
mozilla/mailnews/base/build/newmail.ico
There's no such file, nor is there any mailnews folder?!
2002-01-27-09,
Sören Kuklau wrote:
mozilla/mailnews/base/build/newmail.ico
There's no such file, nor is there any mailnews folder?!
http://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/mailnews/base/build/newmail.ico
--
Disclaimer: This disclaimer is not required by my employer.
This article does not necessarily
Dan Howard wrote:
But on a positive note, I noticed that in the attachments window of
mail/news, the attached file, which is disguised with a .com suffix, is
correctly displayed with a .exe icon. I'll watch for that in the future
as a warning sign.
It is displayed with the .com icon,
Dan Howard wrote:
In case you missed it, the attachment to the original message is a
virus, as reported in the Washington post and elsewhere
(http://www.washtech.com/news/netarch/14897-1.html).
It attacks OE and the Windows Address Book -- does that mean Mozilla is
immune? I'm not
i also found some links to some what look like useful movies
http://mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/brownbag.html
so i'm downloading some of those now.
Thanks again Stuart
Stuart Ballard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
SomeoneSpecial wrote:
i did search:
developer.netscape.com
java.sun.com
google I searched for netscape development techniques and other
variations.
I did look first.
I still really appreciate your reply though Stuart. Thanks
Stuart Ballard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL
Magnus W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
You mean like the navigator/tabbed browsing/open tabs instead of windows
for windows opened by the webpage pref? :-)
I've seen it... I think I even have it checked now... so it would be
neat if, some day, the Mozilla
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
Sören Kuklau wrote:
mozilla/mailnews/base/build/newmail.ico
There's no such file, nor is there any mailnews folder?!
http://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/mailnews/base/build/newmail.ico
He just wants, as I do, to change the icon on his local installation
Roope Lehmuslehto wrote:
I have seen here many links for some HTML/CSS etc. test pages, which
demonstrates capabilities of those languages. But, most important of
those are that, they don't work on IE. So give some links to sites which
doesn't work on IE, but still compatible with
grayrest wrote:
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
Sören Kuklau wrote:
mozilla/mailnews/base/build/newmail.ico
There's no such file, nor is there any mailnews folder?!
http://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/mailnews/base/build/newmail.ico
Thanks, but... (see below)
He just wants, as I do, to
Sören Kuklau wrote:
Both of them are fully compliant to standards.
Yes, I'm aware of that, but I need to find more pages like those, which
won't work correctly on IE. :-D
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Roope Lehmuslehto wrote:
Sören Kuklau wrote:
Both of them are fully compliant to standards.
Yes, I'm aware of that, but I need to find more pages like those, which
won't work correctly on IE. :-D
http://www.meyerweb.com/eric/css/edge should have some good
Small irritation but does IMG context text (text specified in the ALT attribute)
not work or is there an option for enabling?
Please remove the 'killspam' section in the return
address if replying directly.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
On 01/28/2002 02:43 PM, Sören Kuklau wrote:
snip
It has to be _some_where locally. I'm pretty sure it does not download
it from CVS each time it's needed.
Its probably in messenger.jar or one of the jar files. Just open them
all and see where it is. Unjar, replace the file with your desired
Roope Lehmuslehto wrote:
Sören Kuklau wrote:
Both of them are fully compliant to standards.
Yes, I'm aware of that, but I need to find more pages like those, which
won't work correctly on IE. :-D
Any page with an MNG or JNG image. ;-)
--
Regards,
Sören Kuklau ('Chucker')
[EMAIL
k2 wrote:
RE: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2.1)
Small irritation but does IMG context text (text specified in the ALT attribute)
not work or is there an option for enabling?
Please remove the 'killspam' section in the return
address if replying directly.
Sorry for the
Pratik wrote:
On 01/28/2002 02:43 PM, Sören Kuklau wrote:
snip
It has to be _some_where locally. I'm pretty sure it does not download
it from CVS each time it's needed.
Its probably in messenger.jar or one of the jar files. Just open them
all and see where it is. Unjar, replace the
SomeoneSpecial [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in news:XUe58.19786$wF1.2490314
@news1.cableinet.net, on 28 Jan 2002:
What programming languages does Netscape use to program
Navigator/Communicatior v6?
The backend is done in C/C++. The UI is written in XUL (a flavor of
XML) and javascript
Is it
Sören Kuklau wrote:
It has to be _some_where locally. I'm pretty sure it does not download
it from CVS each time it's needed.
Its probably in messenger.jar or one of the jar files. Just open them
all and see where it is. Unjar, replace the file with your desired icon,
jarit up again
Sören Kuklau wrote:
grayrest wrote:
He just wants, as I do, to change the icon on his local installation
to something else.
Exactly. Do I have to put it into /chrome/icons/default/newmail.ico?
From the lxr path, it doesn't look like that.
It's stored as a resource in
Hey Babes,
Me and some of my girlfriends at University of California Los Angeles decided to make LIVE WEB CAMS so everyone can see how much fun we have.
Its 100% Free and Live at http://college.camcountdown.com !!!
COME SEE US SOON AT http://college.camcountdown.com !!!
*KISSES*
~Beth~
Roope Lehmuslehto wrote:
David Gerard wrote:
COMMIES! COMMIES EVERYWHERE!
OMG! They got my computer!!11
:-D
That's one sweet case.
--
jesus X [ Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton sadism. ]
email [ jesusx @ who.net ]
web [ http://www.mozillanews.org ]
tag
Roope Lehmuslehto wrote:
So give some links to sites which
doesn't work on IE, but still compatible with standards.
http://www.libpr0n.com
http://www.meyerweb.com/eric/css/edge/complexspiral/demo.html
--
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve
Sören Kuklau wrote:
Any page with an MNG or JNG image. ;-)
And PNGs with alpha transparencies. www.mozillanews.org has an alpha-enabled PNG
in the upper left corner.
--
jesus X [ Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton sadism. ]
email [ jesusx @ who.net ]
web [
Is there any option to use one single bookmarks.html-file at a
multibootsystem (WIn98, Win200 and Linux) with the new Mozilla 0.9.7?
My prefs.js line does not seem to work:
user_pref(browser.bookmark_location, C:\\bookmark.htm);
How should I change it?
Thanks
Max
This is sort of a hack, but here is my suggestion if you can't get the
pref to work:
start up mozilla with the -ProfileManager flag in one of the Windows
create a new profile and choose a folder somewhere on your FAT partition.
repeat the process in the other Windows pointing to the same
jesus X wrote:
Sören Kuklau wrote:
Any page with an MNG or JNG image. ;-)
And PNGs with alpha transparencies. www.mozillanews.org has an alpha-enabled PNG
in the upper left corner.
Someone on a comp.* newsgroup sent me a hack for enabling proper PNG
alpha channels through DirectX. It
Sören Kuklau wrote:
David Gerard wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jan 2002 20:48:12 -0500,
jesus X [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:Sören Kuklau wrote:
: What's that strange Mozilla logo font?
: http://www.mozillanews.org/images/icons/mozdotorg.png has it, for example.
: Would like to use it for some
jesus X wrote:
Sören Kuklau wrote:
Any page with an MNG or JNG image. ;-)
And PNGs with alpha transparencies. www.mozillanews.org has an alpha-enabled PNG
in the upper left corner.
Huh, whaddaya know, he's right. Totally ruins the page (not). This is
on Why2K though, I'll have to
Hi Travis,
great, this works! Thanks a lot, you really helped me out!
Max
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
Sören Kuklau wrote:
Just extracted all .jars and searched through them. Either Windows
XP's search is broken (wouldn't be surprised ;-) ) or it's not in
anywhere...
(searched both newmail.ico _and_ *.ico)
WinXP's search *is* broken, actually. Not when you are just
Christian Biesinger wrote:
Roope Lehmuslehto wrote:
So give some links to sites which
doesn't work on IE, but still compatible with standards.
http://www.libpr0n.com
Neither the green or blue stylesheet passes the W3C validator. :( And
you can't really expect other browsers to handle the
Title: TeenQueen.com
NOTE: This is not SPAM! This email was sent to you because your email was entered on a website requesting to be a registered subscriber. If you did not request this email, click here to unsubscribe
Sören Kuklau wrote:
WinXP's search *is* broken, actually. Not when you are just searching
for all .ico files, but if you are searching for all .ico files that
contains a specific text string, you won't find anything. See
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/22828.html.
Is there any
JTK wrote:
I'll have to check out this MozillaQuest
I'm sure you'll like it.
--
Disclaimer: This disclaimer is not required by my employer.
This article does not necessarily represent the opinions of my employer.
This article does not necessarily disagree with my employer either.
Have a nice
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
Sören Kuklau wrote:
WinXP's search *is* broken, actually. Not when you are just searching
for all .ico files, but if you are searching for all .ico files that
contains a specific text string, you won't find anything. See
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
JTK wrote:
I'll have to check out this MozillaQuest
I'm sure you'll like it.
I can second this. It's a great resource for those left behind.
--
Regards,
Sören Kuklau ('Chucker')
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sören Kuklau wrote:
It's not becoming clear whether '.abc' will fix it for all text types or
just for this example. If latter, why not use '*' instead?
Presumably because http://www.lesession.demon.co.uk/abc/ is a site
about the 'abc' file type. Try adding it to '*' and see if works! :-)
Any windowmaker users out there know how to give different mini-window
icons to different types of mozilla window? E.g. browser=icon1,
mail=icon2, compose=icon3, etcetera?
barney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 28 Jan 2002:
BTW, I crashed here after I switched to the blue stylesheet, then
back to green. :) It looks like the same crash that happens after
switching themes.
ChildIterator::get(const ChildIterator *
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F6ren?= Kuklau says...
Do you mean not work as in not show up when hovering it? That's
intentionally not enabled as it violates standards. Use the TITLE
attribute for that. The ALT attribute - it stands for ALTERNATE - is for
texts to display when
k2 wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F6ren?= Kuklau says...
Do you mean not work as in not show up when hovering it? That's
intentionally not enabled as it violates standards. Use the TITLE
attribute for that. The ALT attribute - it stands for ALTERNATE - is for
texts to
DeMoN LaG wrote:
barney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 28 Jan 2002:
BTW, I crashed here after I switched to the blue stylesheet, then
back to green. :) It looks like the same crash that happens after
switching themes.
[snip]
Is this the same
For testing of nightly builds for win32 does it make any difference
whether you use the installer or the zip file? Are there things in the
installer that I should be doing if I use the zip file?
I've been using the zip file forever and haven't really had any
problems. But I'm wondering if
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F6ren?= Kuklau says...
See http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/struct/objects.html#adef-alt for the
definition of ALT as of HTML 4.01; see
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/struct/global.html#adef-title for the
definition of TITLE. Note the following in
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002 20:13:44 -0500, Todd Geib
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For testing of nightly builds for win32 does it make any difference
whether you use the installer or the zip file? Are there things in the
installer that I should be doing if I use the zip file?
I find the installer
barney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 28 Jan 2002:
I didn't actually look at the stack. I just noticed the same
GKLAYOUT.DLL attempted to use a null data pointer variable error
message I get when I switch themes. Maybe it's not really the same
Not sure which of these two groups is appropriate for this question.
I have a bugzilla account at bugzilla.mozilla.org, and the email address
(doubling as the username) no longer works. Nor is mail to that account
being forwarded.
How do I go about getting it changed to a new email address,
Dave Morse wrote:
Any windowmaker users out there know how to give different mini-window
icons to different types of mozilla window? E.g. browser=icon1,
mail=icon2, compose=icon3, etcetera?
If and only if you're in windows, you can change the icons by placing
specifically named icon
Phil Edwards wrote:
Not sure which of these two groups is appropriate for this question.
I have a bugzilla account at bugzilla.mozilla.org, and the email address
(doubling as the username) no longer works. Nor is mail to that account
being forwarded.
How do I go about getting it changed
n@a (DeMoN LaG) wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Gerard) wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 28 Jan
2002:
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122083
Ok, does anyone have any clue what is happening with this bug? I
have no idea how this
head and thats why its not being used as an icon for mozilla.
My question then is:
What is wrong with using these icons?
http://www.grayrest.com/moz/icons.html
(asside from the red dino head one of course)
Is there any particular reason why these ones cant be used?
It sounds like a good
DeMoN LaG n@a wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 28 Jan 2002:
It does. that's what my stack was from. Actually... No, I didn't
do a debug build today, so I'll pull/build now and check it out
afterwards. It did crash on yesterday's debug build though
Just got around
The disk caching in Mozilla (at least in versions 0.9.2 - 0.9.7) is
unreliable in my experience.
On a Linux box (RedHat v7.2 /w 2.4.1x kernel) I download the SRPMS package
from Mozilla's FTP site, then build and install the binaries.
When I set a disk cache limit in Preferences I find that
On 28 Jan 2002 13:07:58 GMT,
DeMoN LaG n@a wrote:
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Gerard) wrote in
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 28 Jan 2002:
: http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122083
:Ok, does anyone have any clue what is happening with this bug? I have
:no idea
Hi,
Either I don't understand how to set the fonts in Mozilla or I'm doing
something wrong. It really bad with Italics. Anytime a web page uses
Italics it is impossible to read. I have to copy and paste to an editor
just so I can read the text. Need a little help.
Thanks
John
If you have the GNU tools installed you could use find...
Sören Kuklau wrote:
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
Sören Kuklau wrote:
Just extracted all .jars and searched through them. Either Windows
XP's search is broken (wouldn't be surprised ;-) ) or it's not in
anywhere...
(searched both
I just got a hysterical mental image of someone using windowmaker under
Windows(theoretically it may be possible since XFree and KDE have both
been ported to Windows). Windowmaker is a window manager for linux(the
other major ones being Sawfish and Enlightenment which I use). :))
grayrest
Steve Snyder wrote:
The disk caching in Mozilla (at least in versions 0.9.2 - 0.9.7) is
unreliable in my experience.
On a Linux box (RedHat v7.2 /w 2.4.1x kernel) I download the SRPMS package
from Mozilla's FTP site, then build and install the binaries.
When I set a disk cache limit in
Sören Kuklau wrote:
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
JTK wrote:
I'll have to check out this MozillaQuest
I'm sure you'll like it.
I can second this. It's a great resource for those left behind.
Left behind... left behind... you mean like Netscape 6.5?
Jonathan Wilson wrote:
From what I have read, mozilla.org owns the trademark on the red dino
head and thats why its not being used as an icon for mozilla.
My question then is:
What is wrong with using these icons?
http://www.grayrest.com/moz/icons.html
(asside from the red dino head
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002 23:06:18 -0500, Steve Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The disk caching in Mozilla (at least in versions 0.9.2 - 0.9.7) is
unreliable in my experience.
On a Linux box (RedHat v7.2 /w 2.4.1x kernel) I download the SRPMS package
from Mozilla's FTP site, then build and
Jonathan Wilson wrote:
From what I have read, mozilla.org owns the trademark on the red dino
head and thats why its not being used as an icon for mozilla.
The problem is that there are currently no clauses in the MPL to allow
mozilla.org to keep the rights to it's trademarks without sharing
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 29 Jan 2002:
I've not seen the size thing (never thought to look), but the cache
is known to serve up expired pages (CNN would give me week-old news
until I hit 'refresh'). Have you noticed anything like that? The
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002 16:45:06 -0600,
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:But man oh man, talk about Mozillapology! Holy God,
:his Lies, Damned Lies, and MozillaQuest 'article' has me in stitches! :
:To get technical for just a moment, the total number of bugs [in
:Bugzilla] at any given time is a
The problem is that there are currently no clauses in the MPL to allow
mozilla.org to keep the rights to it's trademarks without sharing them,
including the images. The lawyerbots are working (supposedly) on addressing this
for the license that accompanies the 1.0 release, allowing use of the
86 matches
Mail list logo
