Peter Trudelle wrote:
>
> Nigel L wrote:
>
> > Many will be aware of a war being waged by AOL against an alternative
> > chat/messaging client. This is at the same time AOL launches legal
> > proceedings for anti-competitive practices...
>
> I'd hardly call refusing to carry 3rd-party client tr
Randall Parker wrote:
>
> I misread your subject title and thought it said B5 as in Babylon 5.
>
> Who cares about the fools that complain? My advice is tell all your
...soon-to-be former...
> friends to use Mozilla, send them a link to a download page, and doing
> that will do more to help th
Nigel L agrees:
Randall Parker wrote:
esteemed Nigel L
shucks, thanks! :-[
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
proceedings for anti-competitive practices...
Well, they are funding an open source browser/email/news application that ismaturing into an excellent program
Agreed.
[
FREE SEDUCTION
eBOOK:
Sweep Women Off Their Feet and Into
Your Bed!!! (120 Full Pages!!!)
Aside from tricks of the mind, Neuro
Linguistic Programming techniques, self-confidence and attitude
towards women, th
Title: SIA8
Get your
Randall Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01 Feb 2002:
> Who cares about the fools that complain? My advice is tell all your
> friends to use Mozilla, send them a link to a download page, and
> doing that will do more to help the situation than com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Phil Edwards) wrote in news:a3feu7$j53$1
@dmapub.dma.org, on 01 Feb 2002:
> Drinking coffee builds pressure up, swearing at clueless
> morons who deserve it releases pressure.
>
Reading posts by clueless morons tends to build more pressure than
coffee, I think. Which is goo
Dan Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01 Feb 2002:
> I may be a novice at HTML, but even I know this code couldn't
> possibly work . . . unless you then close with:
> .
No. Just like IE decides to close a table for me if I omit a
tag, Mozilla s
Nigel L wrote:
> Many will be aware of a war being waged by AOL against an alternative
> chat/messaging client. This is at the same time AOL launches legal
> proceedings for anti-competitive practices...
I'd hardly call refusing to carry 3rd-party client traffic on their
servers a 'war', and
If you're using Composer, make a new copy first, don't edit on your
current version live.
Peter
Blake Ross wrote:
> I take it you already have a backup from before you deleted it, in
> which case simply open up that bookmarks.html and copy the relevant
> lines into your live profile one.
>
>
I misread your subject title and thought it said B5 as in Babylon 5.
Who cares about the fools that complain? My advice is tell all your
friends to use Mozilla, send them a link to a download page, and doing
that will do more to help the situation than complaining about foolish
commentators.
On Fri, 01 Feb 2002 13:15:14 -0500 esteemed Nigel L did hold forth thusly:
> Many will be aware of a war being waged by AOL against an alternative
> chat/messaging client. This is at the same time AOL launches legal
> proceedings for anti-competitive practices...
Well, they are funding an ope
Phil Edwards wrote:
> Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > email [EMAIL PROTECTED], ask him to change your account email.
>>
>> That address isn't guaranteed to work, given that I don't work there any
>> more - [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a much better bet.
>
> What are the chances of a li
JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > or help write
> > code.
>
> Work for AOL for free? No thanks.
This is the funniest thing I've read all day.
> > Bitching on newsgroups doesn't contribute a fucking thing.
>
> But swearing sure does, huh Phil?
Absolutely. Drinking coffee builds pressure
Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > email [EMAIL PROTECTED], ask him to change your account email.
>
> That address isn't guaranteed to work, given that I don't work there any
> more - [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a much better bet.
What are the chances of a link (or just a text explanation
JTK wrote:
> Hey, all I know is that the page works in IE, NC4.7x, and not in
> Mozilla. Hence, Mozilla is lagging feature-wise wrt IE and Netscape's
> OWN PREVIOUS PRODUCT. "Hey guy, use this browser! It weighs more, but
> it does less!"
But, as usual, you're wrong. That wasn't a feature of N
Travis Crump wrote:
> I don't think there is clear evidence for this.
AOL did *not* specifically block MS's IM thingy? Did I just dream all
that hullabaloo?
Not that I can figure out why instant messaging (oh excuse me, "Instant
Messaging(tm)") is such a draw for people
Nigel L wrote:
> Many will be aware of a war being waged by AOL against an alternative
> chat/messaging client. This is at the same time AOL launches legal
> proceedings for anti-competitive practices...
Yep, one and the same! And lookee what just came across my desk here:
http://news.com.co
Travis Crump wrote:
>
>> Did that work in Communicator? Does it work in IE? If so, then Mozilla
>> damn well better support it!
>>
> Uhm, when has IE *ever* supported layers?
>
Hey, all I know is that the page works in IE, NC4.7x, and not in
Mozilla. Hence, Mozilla is lagging feature-wise
DeMoN LaG wrote:
> Jonas Jørgensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01 Feb 2002:
>
>
>>0.75% of
>>the browser using population happier, and the world a better place.
>>
>
> Last numbers I saw were closer to 3.0%, you may want to update your
> argu
I take it you already have a backup from before you deleted it, in which
case simply open up that bookmarks.html and copy the relevant lines into
your live profile one.
blake
Peter Lairo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't know what drugs I was on when this happened, but I must have
> accidentally d
Christian Biesinger wrote:
> Nigel L wrote:
>
>> Many will be aware of a war being waged by AOL against an alternative
>> chat/messaging client. This is at the same time AOL launches legal
>> proceedings for anti-competitive practices...
>
>
> What are you talking about?
>
>http://www.trill
I take it you already have a backup from before you deleted it, in which
case simply open up that bookmarks.html and copy the relevant lines into
your live profile one.
blake
Christian Biesinger wrote:
> Jonathan Wilson wrote:
>
>> Does the AOL client come with a full browser on the CD or i
Hi,
I don't know what drugs I was on when this happened, but I must have
accidentally deleted a folder within my bookmarks:
FOLDER...
Computers - Software
Computers - Hardware
GAMES<-- I deleted this one
Jokes
etc...
Since I had many good bookmarks there, I was wondering if the
DeMoN LaG wrote:
> I think I should be able to write:
>and have
> the browser automatically think of some cool content and format it
> however would look nicest. Cause I mean, why shouldn't all the browsers
> support my idea of HTML tags right?
>
>
I may be a novice at HTML, but even I
Nigel L wrote:
> Many will be aware of a war being waged by AOL against an alternative
> chat/messaging client. This is at the same time AOL launches legal
> proceedings for anti-competitive practices...
What are you talking about?
--
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a litt
Jonathan Wilson wrote:
> Does the AOL client come with a full browser on the CD or is it a
> rendering controll built into the AOL client itself thats used to access
> HTML/web content?
To my knowledge, it's built into the client, so that the user can
"enjoy" ads by AOL.
--
"They that can
Lars Brinkhoff wrote:
> I would like to improve the rendition of ASCII text (.txt) files in
> Mozilla. Other than posting an enhancement request in Bugzilla, where
> do I start? Which developer newsgroup is appropriate?
I don't think there's a developer newsgroup exactly for what you want,
may
I don't think there is clear evidence for this. Personally, I use a
non-AOL client for AOL IM(Everybuddy) which since I get it through
Debian is always a couple of weeks old and I have never had any
problems. The outages in question affected a very narrow subset of
Trillian versions so I thi
Holden Caulfield wrote:
> Download doesn't complete; looks like it starts, but there's never a
> progress bar at all; then modem lights (DUN monitor in tray and
> physical lights on my external modem - both transmit and receive)
> extinguish, and neither the cancel button or the close button on
Holden Caulfield wrote:
> I've never seen a "Unknown socket" error from those browsers.
This message has now a different text in nightlies, and will have in 0.9.8.
> Now, about those SOCKSv4/SOCKSv5 radio buttons. One *has* to be
> ticked; I'm not running any SOCKS proxies. I ask, again -- is
That's interesting Stuart - I admit I could be way off here. I must
have missed those threads because from my intermittent perusal of the
groups, it always seemed evident only after the branch. I have read a
lot of posts asking people to be cognisant of vendor issues at certain
times and the
alpha wrote:
> 0.9.7 was released on the day the roadmap did stat it was to be released.
> But 0.9.8 is far behind anyone know why. ?
>
> I have not had any mayor error using 0.9.7 the last 3-4 weeks so why is
> 0.9.8 see fare behind. ?
0.9.7 was not so good for me,and,the nightlies which follow
Many will be aware of a war being waged by AOL against an alternative
chat/messaging client. This is at the same time AOL launches legal
proceedings for anti-competitive practices...
Shawn Neumann wrote:
>
> This is just a stab in the dark, but It seems to me that whenever
> the branch is destined for a Netscape release they are more thorough and
> take longer getting the Mozilla release out the door. My hunch is that
> 0.9.8 will be the base for some Netscape 6.5 or be
This shouldn't actually matter. Any number of applications can access
the same file for reading simultaneously, they just can't write to a
file simultaneously :). As an example. try playing the same mp3 in
multiple mp3 players at the same time, it is kinda cool...
Will Dormann wrote:
> Howar
> Did that work in Communicator? Does it work in IE? If so, then Mozilla
> damn well better support it!
>
Uhm, when has IE *ever* supported layers?
This is just a stab in the dark, but It seems to me that whenever
the branch is destined for a Netscape release they are more thorough and
take longer getting the Mozilla release out the door. My hunch is that
0.9.8 will be the base for some Netscape 6.5 or beta or someting.
alpha wrote:
Howard M. Stark wrote:
> How does one back up fiules in Profiles? I'd like to do it
> automatically. I'm using ZIP One Step and it won't back up the files in
> \ blah\blahblah\***.slt
>
Is Mozilla running when you are trying to back it up?
Do you have QuickLaunch enabled?
Either of those
How does one back up fiules in Profiles? I'd like to do it
automatically. I'm using ZIP One Step and it won't back up the files in
\ blah\blahblah\***.slt
--
Howard M. Stark
337 Mildahn Road
Macedon, NY 14502-9130
Phone: 585.388.7856
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you very much for helping the Mozilla team fix this bug!!!
> THIS IS A *SERIOUS* *BUG*! IT MUST BE *FIXED*! WITH THIS BUG, MOZILLA
> *$UX*! NOT EVEN *NOTEPAD* $UX THAT MUCH! FIX IT NOW OR YOU ARE ALL A
> BUNCH OF EIGHT-YEAR-OLD BURGER FLIPPERS!!!
> email [EMAIL PROTECTED], ask him to change your account email.
That address isn't guaranteed to work, given that I don't work there any
more - [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a much better bet.
Gerv
Jonas Jørgensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01 Feb 2002:
> 0.75% of
> the browser using population happier, and the world a better place.
Last numbers I saw were closer to 3.0%, you may want to update your
argument :)
--
ICQ: N/A (temporarily)
alpha wrote:
> 0.9.7 was released on the day the roadmap did stat it was to be released.
Yes. That happens sometimes, but not always. Note that the roadmap tells
the "ideal release". By the ideal release, 0.9.8 is far (exactly a week)
behind.
> But 0.9.8 is far behind anyone know why. ?
Ther
0.9.7 was released on the day the roadmap did stat it was to be released.
But 0.9.8 is far behind anyone know why. ?
I have not had any mayor error using 0.9.7 the last 3-4 weeks so why is
0.9.8 see fare behind. ?
not_me wrote:
>
> Buy the way:
> Would someone mind to see the www.t-online.de and explain, why MOZ. will
> display a lot of the "nearly-white" background-colours as black lines ?!
>
Nothing strange here,
Dirk
RH7.1, KDE2.1.1, Mozilla0.9.8+, Tosh laptop
grayrest wrote:
> David A. Cobb wrote:
>> I need to change my e-mail address in the Mozilla Bugzilla.
>> How do I do that?
>
> email [EMAIL PROTECTED], ask him to change your account email.
It's [EMAIL PROTECTED] (That's what you meant, I know :-)
--
Disclaimer: This disclaimer is not required
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
> JTK wrote:
>
> >> or help write code.
> >
> > Work for AOL for free? No thanks.
Hey JayTeeKay, did you see that? A space was inserted before the >'s in
my post. That is a bug in Mozilla. But you know what, because I am so
nice I will now make sure that this bug wil
JTK wrote:
>> or help write code.
>
> Work for AOL for free? No thanks.
Let's see:
* You consider Mozilla to be an AOL project
* Contributing code to Mozilla is working for AOL for free
* "Drawing attention" to bugs by yelling in the newsgroups is as least
as important as actually writing t
Your friends at 4PlayMail.com want to make sure you're getting laid.
We've teamed up with Sex2go.com - the web's hottest site for finding REAL
WOMEN FOR SEX - to make sure you're not the only one who's wanking your
johnson Hey, what are friends for?
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
[snip]
> I understand that it was a 50-50 split down the middle buyout by SUN
> Micro Systems and AOL.
Did you *have* to include the full text of every previous message in the
thread, including a god damn *signature* just to add those *two lines*??!!?
/Jonas
January 31, 2002
You won't believeyour eyes!
Hear your fantasiescome alive
Instant access to hotamateur webcam action
Want to get lucky???Play with them!!!48 Puzzle Pieces
Ph
Claude Gohier wrote:
> I haven't seen this bug for many months. Did you try a clean install or
> are you always installing new builds over old ones?
I regulary use the installer-package. Before installing a new build, I
make a clean de-install of the old one. Indeed, I seem not to be alone,
s
53 matches
Mail list logo
