Garth Wallace wrote:
File Evangelism bugs against those sites and they'll be
sent emails requesting that they make their pages
standards-compliant.
When an evangelism bug is submitted does the webmaster simply get a
generic form letter, or are they told exactly what standards they need
to
Shaq Kondo wrote:
When an evangelism bug is submitted does the webmaster simply get a
generic form letter, or are they told exactly what standards they need
to conform to? If so, are they then also pointed to some good websites
that cover the standards in question?
Might depend on a
WDA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
First of all, let me say that I am adament about my devotion to the
Mozilla browser email/client project; it is my browser of choice. I
do have a few concerns however.
I use my computer extensively for
Garth Wallace wrote:
WDA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
First of all, let me say that I am adament about my devotion to the
Mozilla browser email/client project; it is my browser of choice. I
do have a few concerns however.
I use
First of all, let me say that I am adament about my devotion to the
Mozilla browser email/client project; it is my browser of choice. I
do have a few concerns however.
I use my computer extensively for meteorological purposes. What that
means is that I log on often to sites that use heavy
Having the web just work and provide you, the end user, with a good
experience is a matter of cooperation. Cooperation between the people
writing the pages, and the people writing the browsers to display the
pages. The common ground is a rigid set of standards that both agree to
adhere to.