- by real usage!!
Comments welcome...
Thanks and best regards,
Amir Herzberg
Dept. of Computer Science, Bar Ilan University
http://AmirHerzberg.com
___
Mozilla-security mailing list
Mozilla-security@mozilla.org
http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla
that was the cause of your
problem?
BTW, these sites work fine for TrustBar (now using our 0.4 alpha version
which also lets me `rename` them in the bar directly, like `petname`;
but I'm quite sure they worked also in the current 0.31 release).
Best, Amir Herzberg
Hope it helps
clearly indicates his personal preference for more open
process. Anyway, considering Mozilla are currently pursueing a
different, `closed` approach, the technical discussion moved to the new
list Duane made (see original post).
Best, Amir Herzberg
Gervase Markham wrote:
Amir Herzberg wrote:
It is not an issue of fairness, it is an issue of open process. I am
indeed disappointed to find that Mozilla is not acting openly. As a
believer in open process, I am concerned that the result may be
suboptimal.
I would like the process
. I've put it in the
appropriate priority of my `to-do` list. Coding to other platforms is a
bit higher, though.
Best, Amir Herzberg
___
Mozilla-security mailing list
Mozilla-security@mozilla.org
http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-security
the case).
Best, Amir Herzberg
See the new TrustBar homepage at http://AmirHerzberg.com/TrustBar
___
Mozilla-security mailing list
Mozilla-security@mozilla.org
http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-security
of open process. I am
indeed disappointed to find that Mozilla is not acting openly. As a
believer in open process, I am concerned that the result may be
suboptimal. This is not the way to encourage innovation.
Best, Amir Herzberg
See the new TrustBar homepage at http://AmirHerzberg.com/TrustBar
that was the cause of your
problem?
BTW, these sites work fine for TrustBar (now using our 0.4 alpha version
which also lets me `rename` them in the bar directly, like `petname`;
but I'm quite sure they worked also in the current 0.31 release).
Best, Amir Herzberg
Hope it helps
Ian Grigg responded to Gerv:
Amir Herzberg wrote:
So, Mozilla plays `follow the leader`? Nice to know. Not exactly the
original goal of the project, was it?
Up to this point, our discussions have been reasonably civil, but now
you are just throwing clearly ridiculous assertions around
(trying to get this
resolved).
Best, Amir Herzberg
___
Mozilla-security mailing list
Mozilla-security@mozilla.org
http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-security
.
and the CA
was supposed to be named as the one who you could
rely upon. I don't recall it myself, but Bob Relyea
mentioned it.
Yes, but I think that was only in the pre-release.
Best, Amir Herzberg
___
Mozilla-security mailing list
Mozilla-security
Doug Ludy wrote:
I am new at this, but have been following the discussion of phishing at
the n.p.m.security newsgroup for the past month. I would like to try
the trustbar extension but when I try to download the program from
http://trustbar.mozdev.org I cannot do so because I have JavaScript
she likes.
Best, Amir Herzberg
___
Mozilla-security mailing list
Mozilla-security@mozilla.org
http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-security
and
specific solutions. Is there sufficient interest to create an
(informal/Mozilla/...) forum/mailinglist to pursue this? Any volunteer
to take care of it?
Best, Amir Herzberg
___
Mozilla-security mailing list
Mozilla-security@mozilla.org
http
could elaborate 5th a lot: trivially easy to use, idiot-proof, fail
safely, ...
Our usability experiments show TrustBar meets this as well.
Best, Amir Herzberg
___
Mozilla-security mailing list
Mozilla-security@mozilla.org
http://mail.mozilla.org
Oops, sorry, my mistake, I typed citybank.com instead of citibank.com...
Amir
p.s. Citybank is a community bank (and yes, _they_ use unprotected
login... but CitiBank is Ok).
Amir Herzberg wrote:
Hi, I noted that Citibank changed their login form at
http://CitiBank.com. It now points you
Mike Henley wrote:
Hi. I'm using mozilla and mozilla firefox. I often install extensions
though only through the usual websites (mozilla.org, mozdev,
texturizer).
Today though I tried to install an extension from
http://jgillick.nettripper.com/ and as such found myself wondering if
extensions
Ian Grigg wrote:
Amir,
here are comments, not particularly well reviewed.
http://www.cs.biu.ac.il/~herzbea//Papers/ecommerce/spoofing.htm
Thanks!
Mozilla people (2nd try),
Please provide more comments...
Here are some responses to your comments:
Right, that idea. A couple of things - it's called
!`
Best, Amir Herzberg
Interested in phishing / spoofing / spamming and their prevention? See
`Current research` in my homepage http://AmirHerzberg.com
___
Mozilla-security mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-security
much like to incorporate these mechanisms into the Firefox
browser. I'd appreciate feedback on the concepts as well as
implementation advice or assistance.
We appreciate your (and others) feedback. So far, we manage the
implementation Ok.
Best, Amir Herzberg
Frank Hecker wrote:
Amir Herzberg wrote:
We have created a Mozilla extension that creates a secure, Trusted
Logo and Credentials Area, which displays logos and other credentials
The proposal is described at:
Protecting (even) Naïve Web Users, or: Preventing Spoofing and
Establishing
to begin providing it to others soon; in the meanwhile, if you are
interested, we'll love to hear your comments. The proposal is described at:
Protecting (even) Naïve Web Users, or: Preventing Spoofing and
Establishing Credentials of Web Sites, by Amir Herzberg and Ahmad Gbara
PDF at http
22 matches
Mail list logo
