On Sat, 8 Apr 2000, Hudson Kingery wrote:
[snip]
Has anyone found examples of music that are not transparent at 256k or
320k? I'm referring to transparent on a mid-range home stereo not a
high-end studio quality rig. (Mid-range to me is a Denon receiver and
Sennheiser 580 headphones. I don't
huge snip
If you are going to make an incompatible format, why not go all the way
and fix all of MP3's stupidness.
Take a look at vorbis.
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
wich stupidness are you reffering to?
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list (
huge snip
If you are going to make an incompatible format, why not go all the way
and fix all of MP3's stupidness.
Take a look at vorbis.
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
wich stupidness are you reffering to?
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list (
wich stupidness are you reffering to?
Hahahah :)
There's lots of stupid things that mp3 does. It's just an old model
designed under considerations that aren't always valid anymore.
Mark has said a few times that there are several rather obvious things you
could change that may increase
I just noticed that my web page is linked from the
LAME web page. I think I should actually keep out with it. I'm going to switch
back to MSVC instead of intel, mainly because it will actually work with NT/2000
better.
Joshua Bahnsen
Mark has said a few times that there are several rather
obvious things you
could change that may increase sound quality.
Could these "things" be implemented in an MP3 encoder, or would they need a
completely different format?
Ross.
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list (
