On Wed, Jul 12, 2000 at 05:15:38PM +, Shawn Riley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
> I think my headphones have a better frequency response than my
> parents' hi-fi system which cost A$2500, & incidentally the
> headphones came free with the system. The hi-fi system seems to have
> a very heavy hump
On Wed, Jul 12, 2000 at 08:17:40AM -0400, Greg Maxwell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
> On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Zia Mazhar wrote:
>
> [snip]
> > I was very happy when I upgraded to SB Live! from AWE32. The output of SB
> > Live! is very clear and clean. Also, the price isn't very high any more -
> > and
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 10:03:01PM +0200, Roel VdB ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
> Hello Mark,
>
> Tuesday, May 23, 2000, 8:14:18 PM, you wrote:
>
> MT> Actually, there really are 22 "critical bands" or "scale factor bands"
> MT> used by MP3. I guess we should stick to the C convention, and call the
On Sun, Apr 16, 2000 at 10:11:02PM -0700, BBK ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
> command line:
>
> lame -v -b 96 -B 320 file.wav
>
> but according to the VBR histogram, it's still generating 32kb/sec
> blocks, which
> are undesireable.
>
> Is there some kind of bug in the -b directive, or am I not u
I hate it when things go wrong while on vacation. Sorry for the
excess spam.
On Sun, Jan 23, 2000 at 07:22:31PM -0500, Mark Stephens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
> You are sending your mail filter reply to the MP3 encoder list. I am sure
> we all really appreciate the spam!!
>
> mark stephens
--
On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 10:38:26PM +0900, Osamu Shigematsu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
> I got a promblem when porting L.A.M.E for Macintosh as REALbasic plugin. The
> problem is almost of L.A.M.E codes are abruptly quit with calling exit()
> function. However, I have to return error code and I am n
On Sat, Dec 18, 1999 at 02:19:29PM +0100, Gabriel Bouvigne ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
> > > It's right that it's not a lot, but I think it's important. As an
> > > example, a standard 10 or 15Hz high pass filter would be nice, as no
> > > one is able to ear such frequencies, so why encoding them?
>
On Thu, Dec 16, 1999 at 08:06:26PM +0100, Gabriel Bouvigne ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
> ...
> It's right that it's not a lot, but I think it's important. As an
> example, a standard 10 or 15Hz high pass filter would be nice, as no
> one is able to ear such frequencies, so why encoding them?
A 10kH
Looking at the (limited) docs for the demo Fraunhofer encoder (V3.1
Demo (build Sep 23 1998)), one of the options is to enable/disable
"Soft time-domain filtering" which they say uses "a high-quality time
domain filter instead of fast MDCT".
They must be referring to the psycho acoustic model, si
I'm new to this list in particular, and mp3 in general. While I've
used mp3's for a few years, I thought I'd try to give a hand at
improving the freely available encoders.
But, as with most newbies, I have a fundamental question: Where do I
start? I've watched the mailing list for a few days, a
10 matches
Mail list logo
