Is anyone willing to take this on? It would be a major leg up on any
other encoder (and I want it bad.) :-)
Bob
Youri Pepplinkhuizen wrote:
Simply put, the encoder would first encode the data to a specific quality
(VBR), without making use of the bit reservoir. Then after those results
J.D. wrote:
I really should insert a somewhat meaningful tidbit for
--adapt-thres-level into LAME's --longhelp, Ironically, this
task has been lingering on my backlogged TO-DO list for some time.
That's my lame excuse anyway. (Oh no! Did I just make a bad pun?
Somebody shoot me with a
David Balazic wrote:
Very hard to double-click the To: field and hit BACKSPACE ... ( to delete
the authors address )
Why not make the most probable choice the easiest one?
Because it makes replying only to the author a pain-in-the-ass.
I would rather that than making replys to the
Warren Toomey wrote:
I've just changed the Reply-To: field to point to the list, not the
original author.
Please stand by for lots of hate mail from the people who want it to
be the other way around :)
Thanks, Warren. My skin's tough. :-)
Bob
--
Things should be described as
Gabriel Bouvigne wrote:
Is there a way to predict this timeshift? Does anyone know if it's a
variable based on encoding or constant?
It's because of the encoder delay. Now (3.90) Lame writes a kind of header
into the first frame, and one of the fields of this header is the encoder
Ross Vandegrift wrote:
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 11:02:42AM +0100, Gabriel Bouvigne wrote:
Given that could a well written decoder strip it off and give time and
length coherency between source and result?
Yes, it's perfectly possible. However this tag is quite a new thing, and I
Tom Stokes wrote:
For awhile, the executable is there also.
Curious, Tom. Why just for a while?
Thanks,
Bob
--
Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler.
A. Einstein
reinhard wrote:
hi
i have some question about the ms threshold in aac
first , the mthr/sthr what is it mean?
second, why the BMLD only depend on energy
thank for anwer
Could you (and others) please post in text rather than HTML. Your posts
are
Raider wrote:
On Mon, 2002-07-01 at 04:03, Chris Holt wrote:
Hello, Raider,
Hi Chris...
Here is my test list:
Do you draw any conclusions as to the rank of your list?
Bob
--
Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler.
DoC wrote:
Actually we have something like that under OS/2. It's called Tonigy (www.tonigy.com),
an IFS (Installable File System).
Have you tried seeing what happens trying to access a copy protected
disk? I keep Charley Pride's A Tribute to Jim Reeves solely to have
one protected disk
Can anyone point me to a CD ripper that will allow me to use Lame
with my own switches and that employs CDDB instead of FREEDB
(which seems unable to keep up with the new CD content and has
very spotty coverage of labels outside of the mainstream compared
to CDDB)?
Audiograbber only allows
Dominique wrote:
linux - Ripit.pl
windows - Exact Audio Copy
DONT use Audiograbber (and Windows ;))
bye
Dominique
Thanks, Dominique, but EAC also used FREEDB (and requires manual
directory creation that Audiograbbber does automatically.)
Bob
--
Things should be described as
Dominik Szczerba wrote:
Are you sure? I thought there was a place where you specify the
server... and I didnt have to do anything manually. but maybe they
changed it in the newer versions (I used it quite intensively about a
year ago)
CDDB has been replaced by CDDB2 which has tightened up
Chris Holt wrote:
I must apologize for my prior insults.
We should all admit, both programmers and users alike, that we are fools for
writing and even using software that does not conform to Bowie's standards
for input file analysis in command line driven software.
I for one have
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this is not something lame does, it's something mp3 does. however, lame is
the only mp3 encoder which can actually prevent this. use the --nogap
and --nogapout switches for this. see how in the documentation.
Could you provide a link to that documentation? It
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
just use lame -? =)
Thanks, Daniel. What does one say in DOS to send that
output to a text file?
Bob
--
Things should be described as simply as possible, but no
simpler.
A. Einstein
Could this possibly be fixed so that under DOS it goes to
standard out. It is the only way to currently see the
up-to-date set of flags and in DOS there is no way to see
it. Standard error can't be piped or redirected so it just
scrolls off the screen.
Thanks,
Bob
--
Things should be
Mark Taylor wrote:
please try: lame --longhelp lameopts.txt
I also remember that we fixed this problem a long time ago,
but maybe only for --longhelp
Yes! That did it. It would still be a sane thing to change
the short help to go also to standard out.
Thanks,
Bob
--
Things should
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I can't tell weather to use EAC or Rooft Audio Tools. EAC also seams
likea deacant CD Ripper program.
Lars Rosenberg
CEO of Rosoft Engineering, Karlstad, Sweden
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lars, one question on your CD
Jon Skeet wrote:
Has anyone tried to convert LAME to .NET at all?
What does it mean to convert to .NET?
Bob
--
Things should be described as simply as possible, but no
simpler.
A. Einstein
___
Dmitriy Startsev wrote:
Hello, Grzegorz!
You wrote to MP3 Encoder [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 01 Jun 2004
21:24:29 +:
GK In the function 'compute_ffts()' there is a loop computing total energy
GK of 1024-point FFT. The loop is placed in line 305 and looks as follows:
GK for (j=11; j
21 matches
Mail list logo
