Hello,
I`m trying to migrate all the clients from the old domain, to the new one,
installing a new SCCM 2012 R2 server.
The clients from the old domain have the “ABC” site code, and the new ones will
have let`s say “XYZ”.
I plan to move all the clients gradually, using IP address range for
I always advertise to «all systems» pxe media only, and to all unknown
computers.
And password protect the TS.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Jeff Gilbert
Sent: tirsdag 31. mars 2015 22.29
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE:
As others have said, we have a collection Deploy Windows 7 that we put
computers in when we want them to be imaged. Then reboot to pxe. There is a
role that removes them from the collection and clears the required pxe
deployments automatically when the task sequence completes successfully.
My org has tight control over who can use SCCM console, and even tighter
control of task sequences and deployments.
I have an available deployment of our task sequence to all unknown PC’s, and
all client systems, media/PXE only.
To prevent problems, I’ve password protected the boot images.
We are considering implementing App-V for app deployment, and I’m interested to
know people’s opinions on it as a solution.
Is it good/bad/ugly etc? What do people like/dislike about it, and what
problems does it bring/solve?
Do you use the full App-V infrastructure or rely or SCCM to deploy
Advertise the task sequence to All Systems, boot media/pxe only. That's
how we're doing it in the 2012 system we're setting up now, seems to work
like a charm.
I wouldn't ever recommend anyone do this unless you have reallly tight
control (permissions) over SCCM and ALL the techs working it
The unknown systems works great for unknown systems, but what do you do
when SCCM already knows about the computer and the staff who deploy the
images have no access to SCCM? Rather then have them contact Sccm admin
every time they need to reimage, I just use wds to deploy the base image.
It
Or mods the config to client as well. Bom!! Run like the wind Bullseye!
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 12:45 PM, ccollins9 ccolli...@gmail.com wrote:
Advertise the task sequence to All Systems, boot media/pxe only. That’s
how we’re doing it in the 2012 system we’re setting up now, seems to work
Does the application model in SCCM 2012 have a size property for source files
hidden somewhere? Packages do, and software updates store this information as
well. I have dug through MSDN doc and browsed WMI but come up short here. My
last resort is to recursively check the source folder -
Another option for folks that are deploying to collections other than “unknown”
would be to just password protect the whole TS outside the boot image that way
it can be used in Software Center as well, put a condition on the “Execute Task
Sequence” step (or the first step in your TS for those
I have an application that had 3 deployment types. Deployment types ‘B’ and
‘C’ had a requirement of deployment type ‘A’. Deployment types ‘B’ and ‘C’
were deleted. They do not show up in the Deployment Types tab. I am trying
to delete the application but cannot as it keeps saying that those
Hi,
I have had the same issue… delete all previous revisions first.
Kurt
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of David Jones
Sent: woensdag 1 april 2015 15:55
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Cannot Delete an
I have enabled do properties as prestige Dp.
Now one of the package distributed prestage DP with content extract
commands All works good but my team have changed source and they just
updated the DP In this scenario does the package again to be prestage
or just update works ???
Have you tried the sccm console builder if there is any object for this
property to add for applications?
Regards,
Eswar Koneti
www.eskonr.com
On 1 Apr, 2015 9:08 pm, Duncan Russell truss...@humana.com wrote:
Does the application model in SCCM 2012 have a size property for source files
hidden
http://myitforum.com/myitforumwp/2015/04/01/configmgr-right-click-tools-evolved-now-micros-recast/
Take a look at the link and feel free to ask any questions. The new free
tools include some of the fixes people have been asked for: show
Collections works for scoped users and ping now does a
Wow, so easy. Thank you, it worked.\
Dave
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Juelich, Adam acjuel...@pulaskischools.org
wrote:
'Right-click' the Application and go to 'Revision history.' Clear things
out of there and then you should be able to delete it.
I know of two I am waiting for! ☺
Daniel Ratliff
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of rodtr...@myitforum.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 9:20 PM
To: SMS
Subject: Re: [mssms] Ignite
If you miss attending, there's a couple other great events
April Fools, I believe NOTHING today ☺
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Jason King | Solutions Design Team
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Ryan
Sent:
Is there a list on any site or blog of upcoming SCCM Events?
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 10:23 AM Daniel Ratliff dratl...@humana.com wrote:
I know of two I am waiting for! J
*Daniel Ratliff*
*From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of
Hi
Like many things in IT all depends on the scenario where you are going to
deploy APP-V.
I’ve done a lot of App-V deployments and I think the technology is good but
still needs improvements. Also in a high percentage of the cases all depends
on the applications some applications work very
Looks pretty amazing! The audio on your two vids is really low though, FYI.
Daniel Ratliff
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of King, Jason
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2015 10:23 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] New Right
Besides local events and user groups, I think the big ones are Ignite, IT/Dev
Connections, MMS, and SCU. Probably a lot more overseas.
Daniel Ratliff
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Sean Pomeroy
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2015 10:25 AM
The key statement here is that the update was not available on the DP. This
checkbox enables a “fallback” method of downloading the update binaries. It
does not circumvent the updates coming from your DPs.
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Yea, they bought some really expensive microphone that has too many options
for me to get it working right. I think I'll pick up a gaming headset for
future videos :-)
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Daniel Ratliff dratl...@humana.com wrote:
Looks pretty amazing! The audio on your two vids is
The updated bits would be transferred if any. Source is the pointer the
primary to get the bits from, DP does not deal with source because it gets
content from the primary.
Cesar A
On Apr 1, 2015 7:02 AM, Hun boy hun@outlook.com wrote:
I have enabled do properties as prestige Dp.
Now
Ryan Ephgrave just pointed me in the right direction. SMS_ObjectContentInfo is
the class I needed in WMI. I should be able to work some magic from there.
Thanks!
Duncan Russell
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Eswar
Sent: Wednesday,
OK, thanks.
Interesting point about the updates. I can see Adobe Reader becoming a real
overhead with App-V.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Carlos Betancourt
Sent: 01 April 2015 15:29
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE:
“The unknown systems works great for unknown systems, but what do you do when
SCCM already knows about the computer and the staff who deploy the images have
no access to SCCM? “
Optional Advertisement to “All Systems” pxe and media only takes care of that.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
You can't change a deployment from available to required without doing some
very unsupported things in the database.
Can it be done in SCCM 2007? If so, maybe a deployment to All Systems is
just what you need to get that upgrade started!
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 6:45 AM, ccollins9
Pls Correct me.
Prestage DPs function not applicable if we do any package update from SCCM
console.
Pls correct me my understanding...
Sent from iPhonesorry for typos
On 01-Apr-2015, at 8:10 pm, elsalvoz elsal...@gmail.com wrote:
The updated bits would be transferred if any.
I had a session at TechEd on using App-V and UE-V with Configuration Manager
that might be helpful if you’re looking for an overview:
http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/MMS/2013/DC-B307
Thanks,
~Jeff
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Matt
Looks good. Thanks Jeff
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Jeff Gilbert
Sent: 01 April 2015 16:36
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Experiences with App-V
I had a session at TechEd on using App-V and UE-V with Configuration
Yes sir.
-Original Message-
From: Gannon, Todd [todd.gan...@cbh.com.aumailto:todd.gan...@cbh.com.au]
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2015 09:10 PM Eastern Standard Time
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Exclude VPN computers from Task Sequence application
deployment.
Thanks
Do yo have a SUP for internet clients?
Internet clients still need to scan against a SUP so they know what updates
to download direct from MS.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015, 9:29 PM Lawrence, Tony tony.lawre...@lendlease.com
wrote:
Thanks for the replies… a great source of information.
I will have
Thanks for the replies… a great source of information.
I will have to investigate some more as not seeing this at all. We do have
Internet Client Base Management enabled and the DP that acts as Internet DP
does not have WSUS on, but with this setting enable should not matter and still
go out
Hello - In a few week's time I will be deploying a new application to all
computers in our organisation via a task sequence, and I would like to exclude
vpn connected computers from receiving the deployment until they are in the
office and connected via lan/wlan due to the fact that there is
Thanks for that.
So are you saying putting conditions on the first step of the ts?
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff
Sent: Thursday, 2 April 2015 8:21 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Exclude VPN
If your environment is anything like ours, the collections wont keep up with
the roaming clients. I would control this entirely at the local level, put some
checks in your task sequence and slowly hit all the machines as they come on
and off the network.
Daniel Ratliff
From:
You’d miss Satya’s keynote, some technical breakout sessions, and the welcome
reception (free drinks/mixing in the hall during later expo hours 6:15 – 8:15).
Unless there are Monday tech sessions that are must-attends for you, then I
think you would actually do fine with Tu, W, Th.
-billb
LOL! That made me laugh… love this list! ☺
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of henry.wil...@sanofi.com
Sent: den 1 april 2015 19:51
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Ignite
Well, I’m in the schedule builder and unless you
Is there a Sloooww answer?
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Rod Trent
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2015 1:51 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Ignite
Quick answer: No.
From:
Only if you use a Southern drawl.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of henry.wil...@sanofi.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2015 2:07 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Ignite
Is there a Sloooww answer?
From:
Well, I’m in the schedule builder and unless you want the “cloud” shoved up
your arse, the content list is very thin – Especially for anything – Systems
Management! ☹
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Bill Bernat
Sent: Wednesday, April
I just understand why 15k people would register for a conference without even
knowing what the content was going to be like. You guys drink too much of the
Kool-aide!
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of henry.wil...@sanofi.com
Sent:
If the package version changes, package prestage is useless. After you have
completed the package import to the DP, deltas will be resent when doing a
refresh.
I'm not sure if I'm following you on what the goal you are trying to
accomplish.
Cesar A
On Apr 1, 2015 7:50 AM, Hun boy
With a proper link:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/7075.system-center-2012-configuration-manager-survival-guide.aspx
Ed Aldrich | Channel Solutions Engineer | 1E
+1 (401) 924-2293
[Description: Description: cid:image011.png@01CAD56A.EFDE3F90] Ent Cli Mgmt
From the Product Group earlier today:
The community-based Microsoft Intune Survival
Guidehttp://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/23431.microsoft-intune-survival-guide.aspx
has been launched on the TechNet Wiki. This parallels the Configuration
Manager Survival
Trying hard to keep that 13th MVP award, I see.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]
On Behalf Of Ed Aldrich
Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2015 2:45 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Microsoft Intune Survival Guide now live!
From the
I was, and I did! :)
Tks for noticing!
Ed Aldrich
Mobile: (401) 924-2293
ed.aldr...@1e.commailto:ed.aldr...@1e.com | www.1e.comhttp://www.1e.com/
[Description: Description: cid:image011.png@01CAD56A.EFDE3F90] Ent Cli Mgmt
(2003-2015)
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
DOHT!!!
Ed Aldrich
Mobile: (401) 924-2293
ed.aldr...@1e.commailto:ed.aldr...@1e.com | www.1e.comhttp://www.1e.com/
[Description: Description: cid:image011.png@01CAD56A.EFDE3F90] Ent Cli Mgmt
(2003-2015)
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of
Those are the big ones I know of as well, with a question mark for a Microsoft
event in Europe:
* System Center Universe (already happened in States)
* Ignite May 4-8 in Chicago
* IT/Dev Connectionshttp://devconnections.com/ Sep 14-17 in Vegas
* Tech Ed Europe or Ignite Europe?
I haven’t heard anything, but they have had a TechEd Europe that time of year
in the past. No way to predict what they will or won’t do though….
-billb
From: Zarzycki, Mariusz (CIT-IOPA)
mariusz.zarzy...@bshg.commailto:mariusz.zarzy...@bshg.com
Reply-To:
Office 365 is the big topic this year.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of henry.wil...@sanofi.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2015 1:51 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Ignite
Well, I’m in the schedule builder and
Happy to accommodate you Sir☺
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Andreas Hammarskjöld
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2015 1:54 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Ignite
LOL! That made me laugh… love this list! ☺
From:
Are there really any gossips about events in Europe, comparable to Ignite?
Best regards,
Mariusz Zarzycki
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Bill Bernat
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2015 7:37 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re:
I really don’t like the idea of advertising a TS that could re-image a
computer. I decided to just make a new OU and target my TS to that OU. So if
someone needs to reimage a computer, they need to first move computer object
into this OU.
Works like a charm, thanks all for your help.
From:
I resemble that remark!
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Rod Trent
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2015 1:33 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Ignite
Only if you use a Southern drawl.
From:
You guys forgot about the best conference, the PowerShell summit in
Charlotte this month! There will be literally dozens of us!
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Marcum, John jmar...@babc.com wrote:
I resemble that remark!
*From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
We are testing the SCCM 2012 SP1 CU4 Endpoint Protection module, and I was
wondering if anyone else has been using it. I'm looking for the detection of
Antimalware logs on the client,
Regards.
Richard
Email: jch...@semprautilities.commailto:jch...@semprautilities.com
59 matches
Mail list logo
