so describes in his blog post(s).
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Bradley, Matt
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 2:44 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
S
come from the store as
noted. This can be prevented by setting the appropriate group policy which
Michael also describes in his blog post(s).
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Bradley, Mat
In the past when I built my 1607 image, I used Niehaus's script, seen here:
https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/mniehaus/2015/11/11/removing-windows-10-in-box-apps-during-a-task-sequence/.
Worked great. Went to go use it again, as I build our new 1709 image (we
skipped 1703), and am not
myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Bradley, Matt
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 3:00 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: [mssms] Backtracking a Forced Restart
I've got a few users that are experiencing a forced restart via the
I've got a few users that are experiencing a forced restart via the 10 minutes
countdown prompt. I can't figure out what deployment that may be coming from.
I've looked in appenforce.log and execmgr.log and don't see anything. Any idea
how else I can figure out where that is coming from?
I'm tring to build a USB drive for standalone imaging, but I keep getting hash
value errors. Even if I redistribute the one package is stops and fails at, it
doesn't give me a full list, so I end up having to wait again for the next
hours-long build to find the next failed hash. Is there a
I'm using pre-provisioning successfully in my task sequence for bitlocker/MBAM.
It finishes fast, encrypting just the used space. Once it completes imaging,
though, I'd like it to go ahead and start doing the full disk encryption in the
background. Has anyone tried to do the same thing? I
I’m currently in the middle of a Win10 readiness project, and we have a high
rate of failure with the in-place upgrade task sequence. I’m currently at
about a 13% failure rate. Frustratingly, the logs only give that generic error
code. It never says what it actually conflicted with. I have
listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Bradley, Matt
Sent: Monday, December 5, 2016 9:34 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: RE: [External] Re: [mssms] W10 Upgrade &am
, November 16, 2016 9:45 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [External] Re: [mssms] W10 Upgrade & Printer Issues
Did you update your drivers on the Print Server for Windows 10?
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Bradley, Matt
<mbrad...@quiktrip.com<mailto:mbrad...@quiktrip.com>>
I'm running a PowerShell script in my Win10 in-place upgrade task sequence,
that places the computer in an AD group (service branch groups). Trying to
anyway. It's failing with an access denied. Failing in this way:
New-Object: Retrieving the COM class factory for component with CLSID
With the Windows 10 in-place upgrade task sequence, you can't do a custom wim,
that I would normally do to capture all the latest patches. I'm curious to how
others are dealing with this. Are you putting in a command line at the end to
run wusa.exe and install the .msu file for the latest
Of the various scripts I've seen out there that people use to remove unwanted
appx packages from their Windows 10 deployments...is there a best time to do
that? Should I run the removal script against my WIM that I'm going to capture
from a golden image, or should I be running the script
My in-place upgrade from Win7/8 to Win10 1607 works on a bitlocked machine.
I'm using the out-of-the box in-place task sequence. Somewhere in that magic
it is able to suspend the boot-time bitlock PIN requirement we have on our
laptops. It successfully reboots during the upgrade process
I'm currently working through this process myself with SCCM 1606 and Win10 1607
Enterprise. The one tip I can give you, is make sure your antivirus is
compatible with the in-place upgrade. I had a test machine that was not
totally current with Symantec Endpoint Protection version, and it
Does anyone know of a PowerShell command to retrieve a list of collections that
a machine has been made a direct member of, not query based?
Don’t forget the other Win7 BITS hotfix that fixes it if it goes too slow.
It’s the Goldilocks combo…one is too fast, the other is too slow, but the one
after the patches is juuust right.
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/2732072
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
I'm trying to sideload my first appx file through SCCM, and not having much
luck. I find that if the app has been manually installed before, it fails,
saying that it is already installed. It even downloads the appx file to the
cache, unlike an MSI deployment that never downloads if it detects
A person further down on that page in the comments section said he was able to
get the same power change benefits by using a one line PowerShell command:
(gwmi -NS rootcimv2power -Class win32_PowerPlan -Filter "ElementName ='High
Performance'").Activate()
He placed it in different parts of the
You’re going to need to read the VERSION with Lenovo’s. Their model numbers
don’t mean jack, and will change throughout the production life cycle. For
example, here is the WMI query I use on their M92p:
SELECT * FROM Win32_ComputerSystemProduct WHERE Version LIKE 'ThinkCentre M92p'
From:
...@lists.myitforum.com
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Bradley, Matt
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 9:38 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] KB detection clause
In trying to devise a detection clause for an .exe KB deployment, I
When I image my Surface3’s, I have them on the dock to gain mouse and keyboard
control, but I still have to use the Microsoft Ethernet Adapter plugged
directly into the Surface3 to do PXE booting to SCCM. The Microsoft Ethernet
Adapter is the only USB Ethernet adapter that has worked for me.
I'm trying to combine two queries together, and having not done this before, am
having difficulty. My task is to search by computer name with an application.
For example, my first query is name:
select
I've noted that sometimes when I deploy a package, that if the computer has
Windows updates queued (via SCCM), it install those updates first and reboots
the computer, and my package deployment fails. I then have to redeploy the
package, and then it installs ok. Is there any way to keep that
Ok, I got this figured out and working. Like I said, updating our SCCM server
falls under one of our admins duties. But as I got to digging, there appeared
to be a CU msp path in the folder structure of my client install files. Inside
the folder with ccmsetup.exe, there is the i386 and x64
is unsupported by MS. Its a holdover from
SMS2003 days.
On Wed Jan 28 2015 at 10:02:31 AM Bradley, Matt
mbrad...@quiktrip.commailto:mbrad...@quiktrip.com wrote:
Ok, I got this figured out and working. Like I said, updating our SCCM server
falls under one of our admins duties. But as I got
We're on 2012R2 CU3, but it seems that when I right-click on a PC and push the
client install, that it is installing the CU2 version. Is there something
specific that has to be done after upgrading to CU3 to upgrade the right-click
install?
...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Bradley, Matt
Sent: 27 January 2015 14:10
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Right-Click Client Install
We're on 2012R2 CU3, but it seems that when I
Microsoft support once told me that you had to have both an x86 and x64 boot
image available, even if you weren't using the x86. Don't know if that's true
or not. Also, make sure you're fully patched to CU3. CU3 fixed an issue where
it wouldn't always serve up the proper architecture. That
trying to get to Support. To get the CU3 download link.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Bradley, Matt
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 9:45 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms
Is anyone using HP's Systems Software Manager successfully within a task
sequence? I would be interested in hearing how others have been able to pull
this off.
Has anyone seen that show up in the SMSPXE log before? I'm in a situation
where I can't PXE boot. Even though both the x86 and the x64 boot images are
checked off for PXE deployment, I still get a failure. Even more strange, I
can create a bootable USB drive and it is boots the task sequence
to their own collection that HAS an
x64 boot wim based task sequence deployed to it or deploy your x64 boot wim
task sequence AFTER the x86 one,
the end result of the latter is your other machines will pull the x64 boot wim
down and then stage the x86,
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Bradley, Matt
Yes, those are checked.
I checked that folder location...good tip. I'm only seeing two boot images.
Both are x86 ones. One is a 6.2 version, and another the 6.3 version that came
into place after the 2012R2 upgrade. I take it I should be seeing the x64 and
I'm not. Not sure why.
From:
the x86 one,
the end result of the latter is your other machines will pull the x64 boot wim
down and then stage the x86,
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Bradley, Matt
mbrad...@quiktrip.commailto:mbrad...@quiktrip.com wrote:
Has anyone seen that show up in the SMSPXE log before? I’m in a situation
attached to
those task sequences,
to do this for unknown computers you create another two collections with direct
membership like those shown below
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Bradley, Matt
mbrad...@quiktrip.commailto:mbrad...@quiktrip.com wrote:
Even though I’ve checked the x86 and x64
...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Bradley, Matt
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 9:55 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Patch/WIM Injection
I've read that some people do
I've read that some people do not like injecting monthly patches directly into
the OS WIM. Some prefer to just capture reference images. Being that a bad
patch could be removed from a WIM if it was determined to be bad, I'd like to
hear some feedback on why some choose to still stay away from
I tried search the archives, and couldn't find anything.
I'm curious as to how other organizations handle their SCCM staffing. Do you
have dedicated SCCM administrators? Do you have separation of duties (patch
management, OSD, application packaging, etc.)?
I never could get our Surface Pro 3’s to PXE boot through the docking station.
I had to get the official USB Ethernet adapter from Microsoft, and then it
immediately saw the PXE server.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Niall Brady
Sent:
, 2014 8:33 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] imaging Surface Pro 3 via docking station
thanks Matt, what error did you get when you tried through the docking station ?
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Bradley, Matt
mbrad...@quiktrip.commailto:mbrad...@quiktrip.com wrote:
I
) or the gigabit one (model 1663)
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Bradley, Matt
mbrad...@quiktrip.commailto:mbrad...@quiktrip.com wrote:
Never got an error, it would just time out looking for the PXE server, and then
boot on into the OS that was already preloaded. I went through MS support on
that one
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 9:12 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] imaging Surface Pro 3 via docking station
interesting, no change in behaviour after the sp3 was installed/firmware
updated ?
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Bradley, Matt
mbrad...@quiktrip.commailto:mbrad
43 matches
Mail list logo
