At 15:22 01/07/99 +0200, you wrote:
Anyway, it would suffice for images on most webpages wouldn't it? a page
with images bigger than that should be banned anyway...=)
Ofcourse, but you can resize large images to small ones, not vice versa.
It was more expensive than other cameras which are in
Hmmm, think of this, there are sony digital camera's that store your
pictures directly to floppy disk, compressed in JPEG.
Those camera's use a chip, capable of realtime JPEG compression. I
don't
know about decompression, I haven't had the opportunity to examine the
camera up
High costs? Complex HW?
Hmmm, think of this, there are sony digital camera's that store your
pictures directly to floppy disk, compressed in JPEG.
Those camera's use a chip, capable of realtime JPEG compression. I don't
know about decompression, I haven't had the opportunity to examine the
From: "Laurens Holst" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hmmm, think of this, there are sony digital camera's that store your
pictures directly to floppy disk, compressed in JPEG.
Those camera's use a chip, capable of realtime JPEG compression. I don't
know about decompression, I haven't had the
At 14:54 28/06/99 -0300, you wrote:
High costs? Complex HW?
Hmmm, think of this, there are sony digital camera's that store your
pictures directly to floppy disk, compressed in JPEG.
Those camera's use a chip, capable of realtime JPEG compression. I don't
know about decompression, I
the
camera up close, but I can imagine that it exists.
Don't invent the wheel twice, look around...
Greetz
From: Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: R: web browser for msx
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 14:43:25 -0300 (EST
JPG will take a long time! Even GIF)
That's why the hard job is made by a server running WISE...
What about a HW to de/compress JPG images ? It's not so difficult to do for
a guy expert in HW ...
1. Price (HW has costs)
2. Complexity (it's not an easy HW)
3.
