Hello !
See the following link for MSX-PLAYer news :
http://es.groups.yahoo.com/group/hispamsx/message/11680
It's in Spanish.
I resume here the main facts :
- There are still plans for a free version of this emulator (for
distribution with free games and promote programming), but Microsoft
] If you think of Marat in that way, so be it. I just wanted to state publicly
] that this view of Marat is not shared by everyone who has dealed with him.
I fully agree on this.
] I think openMSX will be able to shine on its own merits, there is no need to
] speak ill of fMSX and its
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 04:30:55AM +0100, Patriek Lesparre wrote:
-snip offensive rant about Marat-
Please, if you have some personal grudge against Marat, keep it off-list.
Please do not bother us with your resentfulness. Also note that talking behind
his back, like Takamichi pointed out, is
Sean Young wrote:
Please, if you have some personal grudge against Marat, keep it off-list.
Please do not bother us with your resentfulness. Also note that talking
behind his back, like Takamichi pointed out, is bad manners.
I'm sorry I voiced an opinion that many people have.
This is a public
] generations too early. Also, do not *ever* run Marat software. Do I need
] to explain this one? ;)
Why is everybody picking so much on Marat?
Note that fMSX is the father of many other MSX emulators that currently
exist. Even the much heralded NLMSX is derived from fMSX.
Although I do
Alex Wulms wrote, in reply to Richard Atkinson:
] generations too early. Also, do not *ever* run Marat software. Do I need
] to explain this one? ;)
Why is everybody picking so much on Marat?
Because he's an evil megalomaniac greedy thinks-he-knows-it-all asshole. Do
I really need to explain
On Sunday 24 March 2002 13:07, you wrote:
Alex Wulms wrote, in reply to Richard Atkinson:
] generations too early. Also, do not *ever* run Marat software. Do I need
] to explain this one? ;)
Why is everybody picking so much on Marat?
Because he's an evil megalomaniac greedy
Maarten ter Huurne wrote:
I have a very different view of Marat. I don't think he has any more of a
know-it-all attitude than the average programmer has.
Do I have to repeat how FIRMLY he stated GameBoy emulation was totally
impossible on MSX, even if the emulation was limited? Do I really have
I think it will be a better choice wait for Ademir's CIEL 3++,
since it will
be a much better new MSX than anything ASCII is planning for us.
ASCII isn't planning anything anymore for us... It's all in the
hands of the MSX Association now.
Greets,
Bart.
--
For info, see
On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 09:08:20AM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with Adriano. I'm disappointed too with ASCII. If that's what they
think about making new MSX, i'm out. if they don't want to write their own
(and a good one, as ricardo bittencourt did) emulator, they could have used
But in any case, it's interesting to see what will happen. If Nishi does
acquire the copyrights of the BIOS and MSX-DOS, what sort of license will
he release it under? Note that he could even use it prevent the BIOS
being distributed other than with MSX Player; which would just be a pain
to us
Hello,
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002 13:56:34 +0100
Patriek Lesparre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But in any case, it's interesting to see what will happen. If Nishi does
acquire the copyrights of the BIOS and MSX-DOS, what sort of license will
he release it under? Note that he could even use it prevent
Javi Lavandeira wrote:
MSX-DOS2 is owned by the company who wrote it: Madge Corporation
(www.madge.co.uk), and ASCII only had (has?) distribution rights. They
don't even have the source code. And the BIOS is still owned by Microsoft.
Didn't I say once they got the rights? Please read before
]
]
] Reading the notice in www.msx.org, now I'm convinced that that piece of
] crap called MSX PLAYer is really the worst port of fMSX I have ever seen
] (and fMSX sucks, too). Otherwise, why would MSX Association would have
] to talk with Marat?
Hi Adriano,
It is indeed a very well known
Alex,
It is indeed a very well known fact that MSX Player is a fMSX port on Intent.
Though, I have heard from a reliable source that a lot of effort has gone
into debugging and improving MSX Player since the beta release of last
september.
Good! That beta release was
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha wrote:
Good! That beta release was really a pain... Well, let's wait a
little and, until MSX-PLAYer come to our hands, lets buy a Pentium 4
2.2GHz to run softwares in the emulator at the same speed as in our real
MSXs. :)
Hmm. Do
Hey guyz,
It seems that something is happening again in MSX Revival land.
MSX PLAYer bonanza starts at April 8th, 2002.
More info on the MSX Resource Center.
Greetings,
Sander Zuidema
http://www.msx.org
http://www.benjaminb.nl
--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Reading the notice in www.msx.org, now I'm convinced that that piece of
crap called MSX PLAYer is really the worst port of fMSX I have ever seen
(and fMSX sucks, too). Otherwise, why would MSX Association would have
to talk with Marat?
Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL
18 matches
Mail list logo
