Not sure if anyone mentioned jamoma - at least part of it has a
permissive licence, not sure if it's the bit you would need
http://redmine.jamoma.org/projects/audiograph
On 8 Feb 2011, at 03:28, Morgan Packard mor...@morganpackard.com wrote:
Thanks Oliver.
Just took a look. Looks like a very
Morgan -
I don't know RTCmix but the situation you describe is similar to that
with SuperCollider: if you run SC's audio engine as a background process
and call into the engine usually using OSC, your calling application
is separate and doesn't need to be GPL'd.
I don't know how convenient
Morgan Packard wrote:
It seems there are a number of ways to interpret whether an
application which links to a GPL library must be open-sourced as well
(based on wikipedia's expert legal advice).
Wikipedia is not a legal expert nor am I.
The Free Software Foundation which publishes the GPL
Yes, SuperCollider code *should* be GPL, thank God. That doesn't mean
you can't charge for it. Build your application, charge for it, but
put the stuff somewhere as GPL code too.
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website:
subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive,
Yes, in fact I've been doing it for years (the rtcmix~ object for max/msp).
brad
On Feb 8, 2011, at 12:08 AM, Morgan Packard wrote:
Brad,
It seems there are a number of ways to interpret whether an
application which links to a GPL library must be open-sourced as well
(based on
This is how I did the sc3~ object for max/msp. RTcmix is set up to compile as
a static or dynamic library, so it's a bit more tightly-coupled.
brad
http://music.columbia.edu/~brad
On Feb 8, 2011, at 3:43 AM, Dan Stowell wrote:
Morgan -
I don't know RTCmix but the situation you describe
and the csound~ and csoundapi~ objects for MaxMSP and PD are modules
that are dynamically-linked to Csound, but their particulart licence
can be anything
(it's LGPL as it happens, csoundapi~).
Victor
On 8 Feb 2011, at 15:18, Brad Garton wrote:
This is how I did the sc3~ object for
On 08.02.11 10:08, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Ross Bencina wrote:
Morgan wrote:
SuperCollider -- GPL licence, would require that I open-source my app
Are you sure this is the case? even if you run scserver in a separate
process (assuming you can do that on iOS) and call it from your own
On 8 February 2011 15:50, Stefan Kersten s...@k-hornz.de wrote:
the known precedents make it a risky undertaking trying to distribute _any_
GPL'd application through the app store, because apple might decide to take it
out in any moment; not a sound foundation to build any business model on ...
Very well pointed out. That is why we need to look towards other
platforms... and forget this one.
On 8 Feb 2011, at 15:50, Stefan Kersten wrote:
that covers the i don't want to open-source my app part but it
doesn't help
with the apple doesn't want GPL apps in their store part, because
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Morgan Packard mor...@morganpackard.com wrote:
Am I missing something? Is there anything -- free, or not, which I
should look at for iOS development besides Pure Data? Are there not
hundreds of other people with the same needs that I have? Are my
options really
That sounds lovely Theo, really transparent on my
monitors.
On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 20:51:42 +0100
Theo Verelst theo...@tiscali.nl wrote:
Hi all
Using my new I7 motherboard's 192kS/s converters I thought I'd record a
short jazz piece to test a multiband compression scheme at that sample rate.
+1 for Zen Garden, because I was alongside Martin while
he developed and know the code is quite lean and clean, designed
for mobile in mind (Android and iPhone) and he is quite liberal
about licensing.
Also on Brad's RTCmix, I have never found anything more reliable
for basic functions, in a
On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 01:04:53 +
Richard Dobson richarddob...@blueyonder.co.uk wrote:
I can't put a lot of time into this reply, too much else to do. But I
Understood. Me too, just a few days off for hellraising and
then back to the grind too. Appreciate your banter on this Richard.
Very nice.
Can we hear a 'before' and 'after' for the compression, please?
Thanks,
Tom
On 8 Feb 2011, at 19:51, Theo Verelst wrote:
Hi all
Using my new I7 motherboard's 192kS/s converters I thought I'd record a short
jazz piece to test a multiband compression scheme at that sample rate.
Wow, that's longer than the tests I've done!
brad
On Feb 8, 2011, at 3:55 PM, Andy Farnell wrote:
Also on Brad's RTCmix, I have never found anything more reliable
for basic functions, in a test I had a sound server installation
mixing wavs to make random ambient textures, it ran for 4
16 matches
Mail list logo
