Den 02.04.15 20:47, skrev Laszlo Toth:
On Thu, 2 Apr 2015, Phil Burk wrote:
Speaking of zero based indexing, my neighbor's street address is "0
Meadowood Drive". There was a "4 Meadowood Drive" already existing. They
left room to build one more house at the end of the street. But instead of
b
On Thu, 2 Apr 2015, Phil Burk wrote:
> Speaking of zero based indexing, my neighbor's street address is "0
> Meadowood Drive". There was a "4 Meadowood Drive" already existing. They
> left room to build one more house at the end of the street. But instead of
> building a house they built two cotta
On 4/2/15 12:20 PM, Phil Burk wrote:
Speaking of zero based indexing, my neighbor's street address is "0
Meadowood Drive". There was a "4 Meadowood Drive" already existing. They
left room to build one more house at the end of the street. But instead of
building a house they built two cottages. So
Speaking of zero based indexing, my neighbor's street address is "0
Meadowood Drive". There was a "4 Meadowood Drive" already existing. They
left room to build one more house at the end of the street. But instead of
building a house they built two cottages. So they had to number them 0 and
2.
My w
On 4/2/2015 10:18 AM, proud zhu wrote:
>On 4/0/15 6:24 AM, Max wrote:
>
WOW, I have never seen such a date ( 4/0/15 )[?].
The typical error of those who cannot differentiate between cardinal numbers
and ordinal numbers...
73 Alberto I2PHD
---
This email has been checked for viruses b
proud zhu:
2015-04-01 22:19 GMT+08:00 robert bristow-johnson
:
> On 4/0/15 6:24 AM, Max wrote:
>
WOW, I have never seen such a date ( 4/0/15 )[?].
Well, by that zero-based logic surely the date should be 3/0/14?
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website:
subscription info, FA
Seems like MathWorks also changed calendar indexing …
;-)
Steffan
> On 02.04.2015|KW14, at 10:18, proud zhu wrote:
>
> WOW, I have never seen such a date ( 4/0/15 )[?].
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website:
subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, boo
2015-04-01 22:19 GMT+08:00 robert bristow-johnson
:
> On 4/0/15 6:24 AM, Max wrote:
>
WOW, I have never seen such a date ( 4/0/15 )[?].
> I was glad to hear that Mathworks has finally corrected their array
>> indexing scheme to start with 0 instead of 1, so they're now
>> compatible with all th
This has been a topic for a long time.
I wrote this "announcement" in April 1, 2006 in comp.dsp.
As background, Grant Griffin was a very active member on
comp.dsp and had a site called dspGuru.
Press - Release
April II, MMVI
(April 1, 2006 for those barbarian 0 index DSP guys)
After careful
Hopefully this is not an April Fool's joke.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 9:19 AM, robert bristow-johnson
wrote:
> On 4/0/15 6:24 AM, Max wrote:
>>
>> I was glad to hear that Mathworks has finally corrected their array
>> indexing scheme to start with 0 instead of 1, so they're now
>> compatible with al
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 9:19 AM, robert bristow-johnson
wrote:
> On 4/0/15 6:24 AM, Max wrote:
>>
>> I was glad to hear that Mathworks has finally corrected their array
>> indexing scheme to start with 0 instead of 1, so they're now
>> compatible with all the other languages out in the real world.
On 4/0/15 6:24 AM, Max wrote:
I was glad to hear that Mathworks has finally corrected their array
indexing scheme to start with 0 instead of 1, so they're now
compatible with all the other languages out in the real world.
Apparently they knew all along that array indexes actually start at
zero,
12 matches
Mail list logo
