Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 01:46:01 -0500 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org Subject: Re: [mb-style] Audio Drama
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Z [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any idea
on how to deal with artists on tracks that are audio drama, radio drama,
Uhm, isn't that an example of why it is a good idea to remove the one's
that look suspicious? It goes to a vote and then we find out why it's legit.
Granted, whoever added it might not stand up for it, but if it's really
an extant disc then it should come around again and adding DiscIDs is an
So it's acceptable to have some collateral damage (deleting legitimate
disc IDs that were falsely identified as spurious, not caught in the
voting process), to achieve the goal of having a cleaner database of
disc IDs?
I must admit this doesn't sit well with me.
Also, the practice of removing
The tradeoff is between:
[1] users not being able to find the release they're looking for with
picard because a disc id has been deleted
[2] users having to pick the actual release they want because a cd lookup
has returned several candidates
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:04:15AM -0800, Paul C.
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 9:11 PM, Kuno Woudt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The tradeoff is between:
[1] users not being able to find the release they're looking for with
picard because a disc id has been deleted
[2] users having to pick the actual release they want because a cd lookup
has
