I think we should follow the formatting that the artist has chosen.
Some titles would look stupid if / were replaced with / . If
someone comes along and fixes stuff that isn't broken, add an
annotation or raise the release quality to high once it actually is of
hight quality.
Philip
On Fri, Aug
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Philip Jägenstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
I think we should follow the formatting that the artist has chosen.
Some titles would look stupid if / were replaced with / . If
someone comes along and fixes stuff that isn't broken, add an
annotation or raise the
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 09:38:06AM +0200, Philipp Wolfer wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Philip Jägenstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
I think we should follow the formatting that the artist has chosen.
Some titles would look stupid if / were replaced with / . If
someone comes along
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Kuno Woudt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 09:38:06AM +0200, Philipp Wolfer wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Philip Jägenstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I think we should follow the formatting that the artist has chosen.
Some
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 10:52:21AM +0200, Philipp Wolfer wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Kuno Woudt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://musicbrainz.org/track/95f5b438-0dfe-4061-bbc2-c12612ca1f60.html
That's a completely different topic as in this song the slashes are not
separating
Sup.
Here's a quote from the guideline, if two releases are re-released on
one CD, or if two songs share the same track. Now, I'm wondering if
MultipleTitleStyle is limited to these two very specific cases?
I see it used all the time by pretty much everyone to separate two or
more titles (the
