Re: [mb-style] RFV: Adding {instrument} and {vocals} to 'Recorded By' AR

Gecks: Gecks wrote: changed to an RFV as i can't think of any reason why this shouldn't already be in! anyone??? I don't know the process; I don't know what an RFV implies. But I'd feel more comfortable delaying an final vote to implement the proposal until there is a written proposal

Re: [mb-style] RFV: Adding {instrument} and {vocals} to 'Recorded By' AR

ok, i've done so :) http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/EngineerRelationshipType basically, it's analogous with ArrangerRelationshipType in that you can specifiy an instrument (and additionally, vocal type) (whilst i was there, i amended the link phrases for both classes so that they include instrument

Re: [mb-style] RFV: Adding {instrument} and {vocals} to 'Recorded By' AR

Gecks: Gecks wrote: ok, i've done so :) http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/EngineerRelationshipType basically, it's analogous with ArrangerRelationshipType in that you can specifiy an instrument (and additionally, vocal type) (whilst i was there, i amended the link phrases for both classes

Re: [mb-style] RFV: Adding {instrument} and {vocals} to 'Recorded By' AR

On 03/01/2008, Jim DeLaHunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gecks: Gecks wrote: ok, i've done so :) http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/EngineerRelationshipType basically, it's analogous with ArrangerRelationshipType in that you can specifiy an instrument (and additionally, vocal type) (whilst

[mb-style] RFV: Adding {instrument} and {vocals} to 'Recorded By' AR

changed to an RFV as i can't think of any reason why this shouldn't already be in! anyone??? On 22/05/2007, Chris B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: here's a 'few' examples of seperate recording credits for vocals :)