Am 2015-02-10 um 23:37 schrieb Tom Crocker:
On 10 Feb 2015 21:42, Robert Bihlmeyer ro...@orcus.priv.at wrote:
This would also make half-brother relationships superflous: you could
just link both brothers to their shared parent. [...]
Not just half brother, all sibling relationships, assuming
Am 2015-02-10 um 22:42 schrieb Robert Bihlmeyer:
Of course, some intelligence in software would be needed to show the
transitive relationships. But that would be nice, anyway, so that don't
make relationship clusters makes sense.
Regarding grandparent relationships, we have a fair number (more
Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
Gary McGuy has parents Ebeneezer McGuy and Anonymous Female #38475
Andy McGuy has parents Ebeneezer McGuy and Anonymous Female #837212
Therefore they are step-brothers.
Half, not step.
This would potentially triple the number of persons in the database.
As your own
Hi,
Am 2015-02-02 um 13:50 schrieb Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren:
Ages ago (before my style time) an RFC passed to implement step and
half attributes for the sibling relationship, and step for the
parent/child one.
a question I had on my mind for some time, that could have some impact
on this:
On 10 Feb 2015 21:42, Robert Bihlmeyer ro...@orcus.priv.at wrote:
Hi,
Am 2015-02-02 um 13:50 schrieb Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren:
Ages ago (before my style time) an RFC passed to implement step and
half attributes for the sibling relationship, and step for the
parent/child one.
a question
Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
a question I had on my mind for some time, that could have some impact
on this: what is the policy on adding people that have no reasonable
place in our database (i.e. never performed in any role related to
music), but are useful as relationship proxies?
I don't think
On Feb 2, 2015, at 6:50 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren reosare...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi!
Ages ago (before my style time) an RFC passed to implement step and half
attributes for the sibling relationship, and step for the parent/child one.
This was never implemented, and there's a ticket
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Rachel Dwight hibiscuskazen...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Feb 2, 2015, at 6:50 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
reosare...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
Ages ago (before my style time) an RFC passed to implement step and
half attributes for the sibling relationship, and step
Hi!
Ages ago (before my style time) an RFC passed to implement step and
half attributes for the sibling relationship, and step for the
parent/child one. This was never implemented, and there's a ticket for it
still (well, 5...) at http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-9
I personally feel
Although I've not come across a need for it while editing, as a
step-brother with step-parents they're (obviously) a different kind of
relationship but an important one. So I wouldn't use brother to mean
step-brother but think we should be able to represent it. I think it would
be odd to limit
I think with Nicolás that this is overkill. I vividly remember the editor
who tried to add relationships for even the remotest theoretically
imaginable stuff – not only for family relationships, but for the vocal
tree (http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Proposal:Advanced_Vocal_Tree) and the
like. IMO all
11 matches
Mail list logo
