Re: [mb-style] Request for Clarification: positioning of disc numbers

2007-02-19 Thread Jan van Thiel
On 10/19/06, Don Redman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 13:10:24 +0200, David Gibson wrote: > As far as I can tell, the current style guideline information doesn't > have any examples covering the intersection of DiscNumberStyle and > ClassicalStyleGuide. Which order should the i

Re: [mb-style] Request for Clarification: positioning of disc numbers

2006-10-23 Thread David Gibson
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 10:32:30PM +0200, Don Redman wrote: > On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 13:10:24 +0200, David Gibson wrote: > > >As far as I can tell, the current style guideline information doesn't > >have any examples covering the intersection of DiscNumberStyle and > >ClassicalStyleGuide. Which orde

Re: [mb-style] Request for Clarification: positioning of disc numbers

2006-10-19 Thread Don Redman
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 13:10:24 +0200, David Gibson wrote: As far as I can tell, the current style guideline information doesn't have any examples covering the intersection of DiscNumberStyle and ClassicalStyleGuide. Which order should the information mandated by each go, that is should it be:

Re: [mb-style] Request for Clarification: positioning of disc numbers

2006-10-19 Thread Frederic Da Vitoria
2006/10/18, Dave Smey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Wed, October 18, 2006 2:00 pm, Aaron Cooper said: > > My argument is that the disc numbers are *closer* to being part of the > name of the release than MB's special performer information and > therefore, should follow the name of the release (before p

Re: [mb-style] Request for Clarification: positioning of disc numbers

2006-10-18 Thread Arturus Magi
On 10/18/06, Aaron Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2) You should trim your responses so that only the relevant portions are > included. > (In a friendly, joking tone) Or you could get an email client that doesn't show you irrelevant portions of forwarded emails ;) I use Gmail and I guess it

Re: [mb-style] Request for Clarification: positioning of disc numbers

2006-10-18 Thread Aaron Cooper
On 10/18/06, Dave Smey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Since we are apparently connoisseurs of netiquette here, first let me point out that 1) It is not polite to take something mailed off-list and put it on-list. Sorry, I did not mean to be impolite. I just thought my email was "worthy" of being

Re: [mb-style] Request for Clarification: positioning of disc numbers

2006-10-18 Thread Dave Smey
Since we are apparently connoisseurs of netiquette here, first let me point out that 1) It is not polite to take something mailed off-list and put it on-list. 2) You should trim your responses so that only the relevant portions are included. On Wed, October 18, 2006 2:00 pm, Aaron Cooper said: >

Re: [mb-style] Request for Clarification: positioning of disc numbers

2006-10-18 Thread Aaron Cooper
On 10/18/06, Aaron Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 10/18/06, Frederic Da Vitoria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2006/10/18, Aaron Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 10/18/06, Frederic Da Vitoria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > 2006/10/18, David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > On Wed, Oct

Re: [mb-style] Request for Clarification: positioning of disc numbers

2006-10-18 Thread Aaron Cooper
On 10/18/06, Frederic Da Vitoria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 2006/10/18, Aaron Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 10/18/06, Frederic Da Vitoria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2006/10/18, David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 01:40:08PM +0200, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote: > >

Re: [mb-style] Request for Clarification: positioning of disc numbers

2006-10-18 Thread Frederic Da Vitoria
2006/10/18, Aaron Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On 10/18/06, Frederic Da Vitoria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2006/10/18, David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 01:40:08PM +0200, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote: > > > 2006/10/18, David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > >As far as I

Re: [mb-style] Request for Clarification: positioning of disc numbers

2006-10-18 Thread Aaron Cooper
On 10/18/06, Frederic Da Vitoria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 2006/10/18, David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 01:40:08PM +0200, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote: > > 2006/10/18, David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >As far as I can tell, the current style guideline information doe

Re: [mb-style] Request for Clarification: positioning of disc numbers

2006-10-18 Thread Frederic Da Vitoria
2006/10/18, David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 01:40:08PM +0200, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote: > 2006/10/18, David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >As far as I can tell, the current style guideline information doesn't > >have any examples covering the intersection of DiscNumberS

Re: [mb-style] Request for Clarification: positioning of disc numbers

2006-10-18 Thread David Gibson
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 01:40:08PM +0200, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote: > 2006/10/18, David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >As far as I can tell, the current style guideline information doesn't > >have any examples covering the intersection of DiscNumberStyle and > >ClassicalStyleGuide. Which order sh

Re: [mb-style] Request for Clarification: positioning of disc numbers

2006-10-18 Thread Frederic Da Vitoria
2006/10/18, David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: As far as I can tell, the current style guideline information doesn't have any examples covering the intersection of DiscNumberStyle and ClassicalStyleGuide. Which order should the information mandated by each go, that is should it be: Big Works

[mb-style] Request for Clarification: positioning of disc numbers

2006-10-18 Thread David Gibson
As far as I can tell, the current style guideline information doesn't have any examples covering the intersection of DiscNumberStyle and ClassicalStyleGuide. Which order should the information mandated by each go, that is should it be: Big Works (Timbuktu Philharmomic feat. conductor Fred Ner