Re: [mb-style] Changing OtherVersionRelationshipType to OtherRecordingRelationshipType

2006-04-25 Thread Simon Reinhardt
Bogdan Butnaru wrote: On 4/25/06, Simon Reinhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: - change "Release is a live performance of Release", "Release was performed live as Release" to "Release has later recording(s) Release", "Release is a later recording of Release" and update the one case using the live

Re: [mb-style] Changing OtherVersionRelationshipType to OtherRecordingRelationshipType

2006-04-25 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
On 4/25/06, Simon Reinhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - change "Release is a live performance of Release", "Release was performed > live > as Release" to "Release has later recording(s) Release", "Release is a later > recording > of Release" and update the one case using the live stuff since t

Re: [mb-style] Changing OtherVersionRelationshipType to OtherRecordingRelationshipType

2006-04-25 Thread Simon Reinhardt
Hey, so to sum it up: Bogdan said {live} and {acoustic} make not much sense in the relationship since they should be track attributes and I agree. Then I just found an album-album AR type "live performance" by chance (created because of http://bugs.musicbrainz.org/ticket/980) which is not yet

Re: [mb-style] Changing OtherVersionRelationshipType to OtherRecordingRelationshipType

2006-04-25 Thread Simon Reinhardt
Adam Golding wrote: i was discussing this in one of the classical threads--i repaste my suggestion here: I must say, I'm a bit confused by your proposal and don't understand all of it, probably because it's very classical-related. Again I'm pointing to the plans for the NextGenerationSchema (I

Re: [mb-style] Changing OtherVersionRelationshipType to OtherRecordingRelationshipType

2006-04-25 Thread Adam Golding
i was discussing this in one of the classical threads--i repaste my suggestion here: ack--let me try again here--i'll ignore whether these releations are relfexive--either we'll treat them all as reflexive or none of them as reflexive. in the database, in addition to having RECORDINGS and WORKS we

Re: [mb-style] Changing OtherVersionRelationshipType to OtherRecordingRelationshipType

2006-04-23 Thread Simon Reinhardt
Bogdan Butnaru wrote: The only solution I see is that we should make a clear separation between attributes that are relevant to the relation and those that are relevant to the tracks: acoustic or live is a track attribute, cover or parody or translated is an attribute of the re-releasing process;

Re: [mb-style] Changing OtherVersionRelationshipType to OtherRecordingRelationshipType

2006-04-23 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
My issue is with the relation attributes. There is any number of attributes that differentiate two different recordings of tracks, see [A] for a partial list. Why we should select just "live" and "acoustic" is rather mysterious to me. [A] http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/ClarifyExtraTitleInformation O