On 2000-05-20 17:08:37 -0500, Will Fiveash wrote:
Thomas, I agree with the above.
*grin* I do know that I'm bad at documenting changes
myself.
As a gently reminder, I saw your revised patch for the
Gecos regex code and noticed that you removed the
comments I had in the original code.
clemensF proclaimed on mutt-users that:
Suresh Ramasubramanian:
unset user_agent (mutt 1.2 only)
+That+ will get rid of the User-Agent: Mutt 1.2i. I doubt if it will get
rid of the X-Mailer tag (which is not generated by newer mutts anyway).
i think you repeat exactly what he said, and
I've noticed recently that when I'm looking at mutt's index, and I do a
'reload .muttrc', suddenly the parentheses around the number-of-lines field
disappear. Also, a zero gets added to the date field just-to-the-left-of
the number representing days of the month consisting of a single digit.
In
Suresh Ramasubramanian:
:) ... but is there any hassle about X-Mailer: remaining in your mail? I
haven't yet seen an RFC raising any objection to X-Foo: headers yet :)
it's no rfc matter, it's personal taste.
If you don't like to see it you can always set ignore X-Mailer :)
but i want
Greetings,
As I have understood I am not the only one who wishes to use xbiff to
announce new mail instead of Mutt, I assume someone of you know what
goes on in the new version 1.2. It seems to me that it no longer is
possible to turn off the timeout by using a value of zero or less.
A quick
Russell Hoover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sun, 21 May 2000:
I've noticed recently that when I'm looking at mutt's index, and I do a
'reload .muttrc', suddenly the parentheses around the number-of-lines field
disappear.
[...]
If I change folders (or even 'change' into the same folder), the
On Sat, May 20, 2000 at 06:02:01PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
When submitting patches for the mutt code, please make
sure you follow a couple of elementary guidelines:
- Please document your changes.
Thomas, I agree with the above. As a gently reminder, I saw your revised
patch for the
Hi everyone,
I am trying to send /receive emails from the console, so I went for (and
installed) mutt 1.2 and postfix.
I believe I configured postfix correctly, but now I haven't got *a clue*
on how to use mutt. And I did try to read the provided manual and the
man page for mutt, but they
Hello,
Manuel Arriaga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sun, 21 May 2000:
How can I, for example send an email? Is there any special
configuration necessary before doing so?
Well, not really.
Mutt needs these things (that I can think of):
/usr/bin/sendmail (or something like that), for sending
* Manuel Arriaga [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000521 14:55]:
|Hi everyone,
|
|I am trying to send /receive emails from the console, so I went for (and
|installed) mutt 1.2 and postfix.
|
you can change your editor to anything you want, emacs is a bit bloated. I
like Jove -- lighter than emacs or jed.
Hi!
On Sun, May 21, 2000 at 07:44:58PM +0100, Manuel Arriaga wrote:
I believe I configured postfix correctly, but now I haven't got *a clue*
on how to use mutt. And I did try to read the provided manual and the
man page for mutt, but they don't seem to cover the basics... can anyone
point me
Hi Emily, Mikko and Gero,
Thank you all for your replies. This first problem is over! :-) The
"export VISUAL" and "export EDITOR" command lines did the trick, and I
got to edit the message.
Then I closed emacs (I still haven't found a place I can download jove
from, but I will try it out,
* Manuel Arriaga [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000521 16:03]:
|Hi Emily, Mikko and Gero,
|
|I guess this means that my postfix install isn't that kosher after all,
|right? this doesn't seem to have anything to do with mutt itself; am I
|right?
|
This is not from an official site, but Jove hasn't been
On Sun, May 21, 2000 at 07:44:58PM +0100, Manuel Arriaga wrote:
- Hi everyone,
-
- I am trying to send /receive emails from the console, so I went for (and
- installed) mutt 1.2 and postfix.
-
- I believe I configured postfix correctly, but now I haven't got *a clue*
- on how to use mutt. And
Hi Emily/all,
I just noticed that the 4 highly enthusiastic emails I sent to this list
didn't make it to your mailboxes, because postfix is sending my email
with the wrong domain name, so the list daemon just blocks my
messages... :-(
Anyway, I would like to know whether it is possible to have
Emily Slocombe:
I got a bizarre error from trying to do a reply to all to you and the
mutt user group. The message follows:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 21 15:18:32 2000
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem [EMAIL PROTECTED]
me too. same error message.
--
clemens
Resync $
But how do I give that command?
-Manuel
Hi all/Emily,
Success! I just discovered that I had accidentally deleted the symlink in
/usr/sbin/sendmail which called postfix, so that was why the messages weren't being
sent at all.
Then I called a small script (copied from the postfix docs) which flushes the mail
queue and
In the
Hi Emily,
thank you for all the tips! Now everything works fine: I had accidentally deleted
/usr/sbin/sendmail, but now postfix already sends my messages correctly (hopefully it
will also send this one...! :-).
I would just like to know how the "email-gurus" :-) retrieve their email, enter
Emily Slocombe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sun, 21 May 2000:
I got a bizarre error from trying to do a reply to all to you and the
mutt user group. The message follows:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 21 15:18:32 2000
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
- The
Manuel Arriaga:
Anyway, I would like to know whether it is possible to have mutt display
any new messages that fetchmail retrieved automatically since mutt was
yes. read the manual. you can specify the intervals for mutt to look for
new mail. also, whenever you say '$' to resynchronize,
When I began using Linux I started with
Red Hat 6.0 and used KDE's KMail for a MUA.
At that time I was checking 2 email accounts
for mail, which was easy to implement, but I wasn't
thrilled about the lack of configurability, and
wanted a text-based MUA.
I then decided to switch to Mutt, and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sun, 21 May 2000:
thank you for all the tips! Now everything works fine:
Good to hear that. :-)
I would just like to know how the "email-gurus" :-) retrieve their
email, enter their MUA and then have it sent to their ISP without using
as many
Manuel Arriaga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sun, 21 May 2000:
I just noticed that the 4 highly enthusiastic emails I sent to this list
didn't make it to your mailboxes, because postfix is sending my email
with the wrong domain name, so the list daemon just blocks my
messages... :-(
Well, at
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000521 20:00]:
|
|#fetchmail
|#mutt
|#.send (name of a small script that came with postfix)
can't really help with pushing the qmail queue, as I don't know much about it.
But for fetchmail, you could benefit from running it in daemon mode. Just
specify it
Hi folks,
just to announce that the RPM team has (finally, as some might say... :-} )
built a few RPMs for mutt 1.2 and provided them at
http://mutt.linuxatwork.at
Right now, we have:
Distro| i386 | i586 | i686 | K6 | Sparc | Alpha
Hi,
Richard Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sun, 21 May 2000:
But today I tried to use Mutt to check the other
account as well. Here's what I did:
created a .fetchmailrc like this...
This is more of a fetchmail question that Mutt question. I'll answer
the fetchmail part as best I
Thank you all.
-Manuel
Manuel clemens --
...and then clemensF said...
% Manuel Arriaga:
%
% Anyway, I would like to know whether it is possible to have mutt display
% any new messages that fetchmail retrieved automatically since mutt was
%
% yes. read the manual. you can specify the intervals for mutt to look
On Sun 05/21/00 at 09:12 PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds like you have different settings for the $index_format in a
stand-alone "set index_format" command and in folder-hooks.
This was indeed the problem. Thanks.
// [EMAIL
Actually, one of the people subscribed to this list has a broken
procmailrc or a full mailbox. His MTA is returning bounces for every
post from mutt-users that tries to reach him.
clemensF proclaimed on mutt-users that:
Emily Slocombe:
I got a bizarre error from trying to do a reply to all
31 matches
Mail list logo
