On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 05:49:11PM -0700 or thereabouts, Jason Helfman wrote:
I don't understand this but I have a flood of "empty file"s in /tmp
produced by mutt, what is this about? I know usually there are a few,
but not this manyexcuse the ls
mutt-dsl-64-34-6-73-16908-22
my xterm works fine...here is my .Xdefaults file
On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 11:48:08AM +0200, Bjoern Jacke muttered:
| Hi,
|
| if I run mutt in an xterm or anything like that and resize the window
| mutt also resized to perfectly fit to the new size. If I then write a
| mail and vi was run mutt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
I have now built mutt 1.3.7 in four different places, two of the four
required that I get libiconv as the existing iconv wasn't good enough.
The two places that needed libiconv were Solaris 2.6 and Red Hat Linux
release 6.1.
I think this may
On Thu, Aug 17, 2000 at 10:13:37AM +0200, Martin [Keso] Keseg wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
I have now built mutt 1.3.7 in four different places, two of the four
required that I get libiconv as the existing iconv wasn't good enough.
The two places that needed
Telsa Gwynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 17 Aug 2000:
So I get a ton of similar-style file names. In my case, they're backups
produced by my editor. One for each message I wrote. Most of them are
not empty, but are just copies of the emails I was replying to.
Well, if the editor makes
According to section 6.3.27 of the mutt manual (I'm running 1.2.5i here) the
variable `date_format' "controls the format of the date printed by the
``%d'' sequence in ``index_format''".
Further, section 6.3.73 says that the %d and %D sequences display the date
and time of a message "in the
Mikko Hänninen writes:
Telsa Gwynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 17 Aug 2000:
So I get a ton of similar-style file names. In my case, they're backups
produced by my editor. One for each message I wrote. Most of them are
not empty, but are just copies of the emails I was replying to.
On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 11:19:02PM -0700, Jason Helfman wrote:
my xterm works fine...here is my .Xdefaults file
the .Xdefaults won't affect the resize-behavior.
I've seen reported that some subprocesses don't propagate SIGWINCH up
to the controlling terminal; that's a possibility here.
On
Hi,
This was a thought I had while deleteing spam mail and was wondering if
it could be done via a Mutt macro or otherwise. Couldnt really see anything
on mutt.org for dealing with spam.
Ok .. so rather than just deleting a spam mail, I was thinking to generate
a authentic mailer daemon failure
Anthony Green writes:
Hi,
This was a thought I had while deleteing spam mail and was wondering if
it could be done via a Mutt macro or otherwise. Couldnt really see anything
on mutt.org for dealing with spam.
Ok .. so rather than just deleting a spam mail, I was thinking to generate
a
Anthony --
...and then Anthony Green said...
%
% This was a thought I had while deleteing spam mail and was wondering if
% it could be done via a Mutt macro or otherwise. Couldnt really see anything
% on mutt.org for dealing with spam.
As Lars said, that's because it really isn't a mutt issue
On 2000.08.17, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Martin [Keso] Keseg" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The two places that needed libiconv were Solaris 2.6 and Red Hat Linux
release 6.1.
no, it;s not a problem about development computers, that's a problem of solaris.
I was talking about iconv
On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 10:49:31PM -0700, Jason Helfman wrote:
If i were to make a perl script to ask me some questions, and store the
information.. Would I be able to pass this to vi and send from mutt?
If you mean while Vi is open, yes.
:r!command
will read in the output from
On Thu, Aug 17, 2000 at 08:15:19AM -0400, David T-G muttered:
Anthony --
...and then Anthony Green said...
%
% This was a thought I had while deleteing spam mail and was wondering if
% it could be done via a Mutt macro or otherwise. Couldnt really see anything
% on mutt.org for dealing
Charles, et al --
...and then Charles Curley said...
% On Thu, Aug 17, 2000 at 08:15:19AM -0400, David T-G muttered:
% ...and then Anthony Green said...
% %
% % This was a thought I had while deleteing spam mail and was wondering if
...
%
% much to automate my spam submissions to spamcop;
no not while vi is open...I mean I am in mutt. I run a macro, asks me
some questions, and passes it right to vi
well i guess even further is, what are ppl doing when they say they have
soemthing that is being passed through a scriptcould it be the other
way, the script asking them
A couple of procmail rules and enabling rbl in sendmail or patching
qmail is enough for me. I get maybe 1 peice of spam a month.
On Thu, Aug 17, 2000 at 07:40:09PM +1000, Anthony Green muttered:
| Hi,
|
| This was a thought I had while deleteing spam mail and was wondering if
| it could be done
On 2000.08.17, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Jason Helfman" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
no not while vi is open...I mean I am in mutt. I run a macro, asks me
some questions, and passes it right to vi
Is this for new mail? You can write a macro that sets $editor to a
script which runs the
Hi there,
I've got problems with the pgp encryption.
I'm using pgp2 and did everything described in the PGP-Notes.
PGP decoding works slow, but great.
When replying to a pgp encoded mail I get asked for a keyID.
What do I need to enter there? Regardless of what I've tried, I get the keyID
19 matches
Mail list logo
