Alas! David T-G spake thus:
% The .muttrc is fairly robust. You can put almost any shell command into
% backticks (``), and it will be as though the output of that command is
% actually in the .muttrc file. This is why mutt is so much better than
% pine :)
Um, yeah; that's the *only*
Alas! Nick Wilson spake thus:
Hi aqain.
Someone mentioned to me that you could add a header to mails giving the
location of your gpg public key.
How is this done, or are there some useful docs on the topic?
I figure I just create a page from the export-key func on my site and
then point
Alas! David T-G spake thus:
% I wonder who it's actually encrypted to...
Herself, of course. She's probably one of those people who goes around
talking to herself and so particular about her conversations that she
doesn't even want anyone to listen in ;-)
I get it; trying to sign it with
Alas! Tom Jones spake thus:
(2)when replying to a message, look at the delivered-to, to, cc,
etc headers. If one of them is in the list from (1), set the From: header
to that. Otherwise set the From: value to a default value.
Look into send-hooks. The Fine Manual has everything you need to
At 20:34 -0500 05 Jan 2002, parv [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote Aaron Schrab thusly...
color index red default %~P
aaron, i have been using similar syntax for the same purpose since mutt
v1.2.something (less than 1.2.4 for sure) created from freebsd
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 01:30:35AM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
Alas! Benjamin Smith spake thus:
The ways that script works is by outputting the muttrc to a tempory
file, the name of which is outputted for source, but what you can do is
just to put:
`~/bin/do-whatever.sh`
In
Dale, et al --
...and then Dale Woolridge said...
%
% David noted that my recent pgp-hook extension patch conflicts with
Hey, I'm famous! *grin*
% Bardur Arantsson's pgp-hook-extension patch. Borrowing Bardur's
% idea and following David's suggestion, I have implemented the same
% idea
Hi everyone.
I just wanted to know if there were any news readers that would
compliment mutt nicely.
I've just been looking at nn but it was way over my head to setup
properly.
Thanks
--
Nick Wilson
Tel:+45 3325 0688
Fax:+45 3325 0677
Web:www.explodingnet.com
Nick --
...and then Nick Wilson said...
%
% Hi everyone.
Hello again!
% I just wanted to know if there were any news readers that would
% compliment mutt nicely.
Well, some might say slrn, since I hear that the keybindings are similar.
Others might say mutt, since there are some mutt NNTP
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020106 12:29]:
Nick --
...and then Nick Wilson said...
%
% Hi everyone.
Hello again!
% I just wanted to know if there were any news readers that would
% compliment mutt nicely.
Well, some might say slrn, since I hear that the keybindings are
Hi,
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-01-06 12:55]:
You should try replying in context instead of at the bottom; it's even
better ;-)
Yeah, and we like totally unlike anything that would made mails hard
to read for no good reasons.
Thorsten
--
Question Authority!
Thorsten --
...and then Thorsten Haude said...
%
% Hi,
%
% * David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-01-06 12:55]:
% You should try replying in context instead of at the bottom; it's even
% better ;-)
% Yeah, and we like totally unlike anything that would made mails hard
% to read for no good reasons.
* Thorsten Haude [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020106 14:22]:
Hi,
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-01-06 12:55]:
You should try replying in context instead of at the bottom; it's even
better ;-)
Yeah, and we like totally unlike anything that would made mails hard
to read for no good reasons.
So
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 09:21:25PM +0700, budsz wrote:
How can I make mutt able to display text/html attachments inline, WITHOUT
making it pick text/html (instead of text/plain) when the original message
was sent as multipart/alternative? I find the text/html versions to be
formatted worse.
Hi.
When I was setting up Mixmaster with mutt, I didn't find the
recommended version of Mixmaster, so I tried Mixmaster 2.9beta32. It
didn't quite work, but I figured out it was because Mixmaster now
wanted commas between the remailers in the command line.
I haven't bothered researching when
Moin,
* Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-01-06 14:26]:
* Thorsten Haude [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020106 14:22]:
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-01-06 12:55]:
You should try replying in context instead of at the bottom; it's even
better ;-)
Yeah, and we like totally unlike anything that would
* Thorsten Haude [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020106 15:40]:
Moin,
* Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-01-06 14:26]:
* Thorsten Haude [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020106 14:22]:
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-01-06 12:55]:
You should try replying in context instead of at the bottom; it's even
better
On Sun, 06 Jan 2002, Ken Wahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought the issue with the newer versions of Mixmaster was that they
didn't accept the -T switch to view remailer lists? 2 nights ago I
spent hours on the mutt-users mail archive reading anything that had to
do with Mixmaster.
* Morten Liebach [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020106 16:19]:
On 2002-01-06 15:45:11 +0100, Nick Wilson wrote:
IMHO you should make reasonable bits out of the mail you answer and
write your answer in each context.
The above *is* the gospel WRT answering emails! :-)
There is no drug known to
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 03:45:11PM +0100, Nick Wilson wrote:
* Thorsten Haude [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020106 15:40]:
Moin,
* Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-01-06 14:26]:
* Thorsten Haude [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020106 14:22]:
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-01-06 12:55]:
You should try
/usr/local/share/doc/mutt/html/manual-6.html says:
%t * if the file is tagged, blank otherwise
when I press '?' in the browser, I see this:
t tag-entry tag the current entry
but it doesn't work:
(hit 't')
-- Mutt: Mailboxes [11]
Tagging is not supported.
This is
Moin,
* Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-01-06 15:45]:
Problem is that I find that format more confusing and prefer to only
quote if the point I refer to _really_ needs it. (like it's a really
long mail)
Let's take this example:
- - - Schnipp - - -
There is no drug known to man which becomes
* Carlos Laviola [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-01-06 15:04]:
Hello,
I'd like to search for a header, specifically, the Message-ID header,
but haven't found a way to do that in Mutt yet. Do you know how?
Thanks,
Carlos.
http://mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-4.html#ss4.2
~h EXPR
I finally got 1.3.25 built on a FreeBSD 4.4 box. I had previously been
running 1.3.22.
After installing from the port, colors are no longer working properly using
Putty. By not working I mean that it seems the foreground and background
colors are reversed in some cases. Text that was previously
Philip --
...and then Philip Mak said...
%
% How can I make mutt able to display text/html attachments inline, WITHOUT
% making it pick text/html (instead of text/plain) when the original message
% was sent as multipart/alternative? I find the text/html versions to be
% formatted worse.
Look
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 04:18:19PM -0500, Jack Baty wrote:
Now, before I go around messing with trying to go back to using ncurses, I'd
like to know if anyone knows if there's a way to fix the color issue while
still using slang, since that seems to now be recommended. I know nothing
not
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 04:23:36PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
| Philip --
|
| ...and then Philip Mak said...
| %
| % How can I make mutt able to display text/html attachments inline, WITHOUT
| % making it pick text/html (instead of text/plain) when the original message
| % was sent as
* Tom Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-01-06 00:53]:
(2)when replying to a message, look at the delivered-to, to, cc,
etc headers. If one of them is in the list from (1), set the From: header
to that. Otherwise set the From: value to a default value.
I think you can use message-hook with ~h
On 6-Jan-2002 06:12 David T-G wrote:
|
| So does your patch include Bardur's functionality and then go farther, or
| do the two complement each other?
My patch should work as a replacement as it includes all the
functionality of Bardur's patch, albeit with slightly different
syntax.
* Nuno Teixeira [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-01-06 22:06]:
Can I use the same config with w3m?
Yes, you can.
This is my mailcap entry:
#text/html; w3m %s; nametemplate=%s.html
text/html; w3m -dump %s; nametemplate=%s.html; copiousoutput
--
Eunjea [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Samstag, 05. Jan. 2002 at 23:22:42, David Clarke wrote:
On Sat, 05 Jan 2002, Markus Boelter wrote:
How is it possible to store the sent-mail in sent-mail-folder (and
enrypt it with my own key)?
Howdy,
Simply done with the encrypt-to option for gnupg. Just add
encrypt-to
Hi List,
I am currently using:
Mutt 1.3.22.1i
Vim 6.0av
SuSE 7.1
Gnupg 1.0.6
The Problem:
When emailing, after I chose b(oth) sign/encrypt I type y to mail,
enter my passphrase and in konsole I get the following:
gpg: A89A2371--: skipped: public key not found.
Press any key to continue.
If I
I found the star in ACS display of thread tree but I can not find
explanation in manual. What does it mean?
Something...
|
+-*
charlie
Charles Jie wrote:
I found the star in ACS display of thread tree but I can not find
explanation in manual. What does it mean?
it means that mutt is _guessing_ that the threads are related because of
the subject line, and not because of 'In-Reply-To' headers and such.
you can turn off this
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 08:30:05PM +0530, Prahlad Vaidyanathan wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 Stephan Seitz spewed into the ether:
[-- snip --]
PS: How do you call w3m to display html mails?
mailcap
text/html; w3m -T text/html %s
/mailcap
You could also add a 'copiousoutput' at
Is there any way to get the Mutt-1.3.24i threading behavior back?
It looks like it changed again in Mutt-1.3.25i. Specifically, I
like seeing the ?'s, but only enough to give me context. Today,
with hide_missing set, I see something like this
?-?-?-?-?-?-?-Re: foo
`-?-Re: foo
The
i'm giving another go at getting the beta mutt to compile on an outdated
linux machine (for which i don't have root access).
i'm not sure what distribution it is, although i'd guess redhat; kernel
is really old (2.0.36).
i have my own ncurses and libiconv installed in my home directory.
i'm
Hi, Erika,
It looks your postman is specailly friendly to you and you never have to
sign a receipt for a registered snail mail. (Or you just reject them
all. :)
I think such function or mechanism USEFUL because some people, including
me, need it from time to time.
And I believe most of people
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 09:43:27PM -0500, Samuel Padgett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way to get the Mutt-1.3.24i threading behavior back?
It looks like it changed again in Mutt-1.3.25i. Specifically, I
like seeing the ?'s, but only enough to give me context. Today,
with
Is it by design that if you mark a new message for deletion, the
status bar still indicates it as new? If so, is there any way around
that?
Thanks.
-Ken
Previously, Ken Weingold wrote:
% Is it by design that if you mark a new message for deletion, the
% status bar still indicates it as new? If so, is there any way around
% that?
Well, it sort of is technically new as you haven't read it yet. The way
around it would be something like this:
On Sun, Jan 6, 2002, Shawn D. McPeek wrote:
Previously, Ken Weingold wrote:
% Is it by design that if you mark a new message for deletion, the
% status bar still indicates it as new? If so, is there any way around
% that?
Well, it sort of is technically new as you haven't read it yet.
On Mon, 07 Jan 2002, Michael Wagner wrote:
must I put my pub key-id or my sub key-id in ~/.gnupg/options? I'm
not working much with gpg, so I don't no it. I make
The either will work, although you will probably get a message about it
changing to the public key if you choose the sub key. So
At 02:15 -0500 07 Jan 2002, Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
macro index d clear-flagNprevious-undeleteddelete-message delete the current
entry
That won't work properly on the last message in a mailbox.
since I have $resolve set to yes. :)
It would probably be a better idea to have the
Alas! Ken Weingold spake thus:
macro index d clear-flagNdelete-message delete the current entry
...
macro index d clear-flagNprevious-undeleteddelete-message delete the current
entry
Wouldn't these set read messages to new if you try to delete a message
that isn't new? ;)
--
Rob 'Feztaa'
On Mon, Jan 7, 2002, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
macro index d clear-flagNprevious-undeleteddelete-message delete the
current entry
Wouldn't these set read messages to new if you try to delete a message
that isn't new? ;)
No, clear-flagN just seems to clear the 'N' flag if it exists. If
At 00:47 -0700 07 Jan 2002, Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alas! Ken Weingold spake thus:
macro index d clear-flagNprevious-undeleteddelete-message delete the
current entry
Wouldn't these set read messages to new if you try to delete a message
that isn't new? ;)
No,
On Mon, Jan 7, 2002, Aaron Schrab wrote:
It would probably be a better idea to have the macro turn off $resolve
at the beginning then turn it back on before doing the actual deletion.
True. How do I do this, then? I have tried to few things, but
nothing seems to work correctly.
Thanks.
48 matches
Mail list logo
