At 03:01 -0500 07 Jan 2002, Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 7, 2002, Aaron Schrab wrote:
It would probably be a better idea to have the macro turn off $resolve
at the beginning then turn it back on before doing the actual deletion.
True. How do I do this, then? I have
Alas! Aaron Schrab spake thus:
macro index d clear-flagNprevious-undeleteddelete-message delete the
current entry
Wouldn't these set read messages to new if you try to delete a message
that isn't new? ;)
No, clear-flag does exactly that, it clears flags. It should be pretty
easy
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 17:35:16 -0500
From: Ken Wahl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: mutt-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: tagging in browser
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 07:26:28PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
t tag-entry tag the current entry
but it doesn't work:
Howdy all,
Is there a flag for to_chars to display whether or not the message
contains an attachment? I looked through the manual, but don't see one
(appears there's only +TCFL). Am I missing something or is there
some other way to do this?
- jim
--
jim mock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jim Mock wrote:
Is there a flag for to_chars to display whether or not the message
contains an attachment? I looked through the manual, but don't see
one (appears there's only +TCFL). Am I missing something or is
there some other way to do this?
i use a patch from:
set mail_check configures how often (in seconds) mutt should look
for new mail. I have it set to 5, but new e-mail that I receive does
*not* show up within 5 seconds.
It seems that it only shows up if I press a key in mutt.
Does anyone have any ideas?
* Philip Mak [EMAIL PROTECTED] [07-01-2002 11:16]:
| set mail_check configures how often (in seconds) mutt should look
| for new mail. I have it set to 5, but new e-mail that I receive does
| *not* show up within 5 seconds.
|
| It seems that it only shows up if I press a key in mutt.
Do you
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 11:18:06AM +0100, René Clerc wrote:
| set mail_check configures how often (in seconds) mutt should look
| for new mail. I have it set to 5, but new e-mail that I receive does
| *not* show up within 5 seconds.
|
| It seems that it only shows up if I press a key in
On Sun, 6 Jan 2002, Will Yardley wrote:
It won't work (the older wchar_t is a short, not a long). I experimented
recently with that sort of combination with lynx and concluded that you
can't make libiconv work properly there (you can build it, but it won't
run). But unlike mutt, lynx at least
* René Clerc [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020107 11:29]:
* Philip Mak [EMAIL PROTECTED] [07-01-2002 11:16]:
| set mail_check configures how often (in seconds) mutt should look
| for new mail. I have it set to 5, but new e-mail that I receive does
| *not* show up within 5 seconds.
|
| It seems that
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 12:31:46 +0100
From: Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: set mail_check lies
* René Clerc [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020107 11:29]:
* Philip Mak [EMAIL PROTECTED] [07-01-2002 11:16]:
| set mail_check configures how often (in seconds) mutt
Dale, et al --
...and then Dale Woolridge said...
%
% On 6-Jan-2002 06:12 David T-G wrote:
% |
% | So does your patch include Bardur's functionality and then go farther, or
% | do the two complement each other?
%
% My patch should work as a replacement as it includes all the
%
Philip Mak muttered:
set mail_check configures how often (in seconds) mutt should look
for new mail. I have it set to 5, but new e-mail that I receive does
*not* show up within 5 seconds.
It seems that it only shows up if I press a key in mutt.
mailboxes must be set
You have to find a
I have the same problem, I only get my mail if I hit 'G'
What should $mailboxes be set to?
I had a look at the manual but couldn't really understand it.
An example would be great!
You use mutt's POP3 functions? AFAIK check_new etc. don't apply
here. They're for checking
Hi,
When I send emails to a .net domain, they are returned
because the domain name can't be resolved. I know this
probably isn't a mutt problem, but could someone give
a suggestion of where to look?
Thanks.
=
Todd Kokoszka
25, rue Richard Lenoir
75011 Paris
Tel. 01.43.72.77.08
* Todd Kokoszka [EMAIL PROTECTED] [07-01-2002 13:39]:
| When I send emails to a .net domain, they are returned
| because the domain name can't be resolved. I know this
| probably isn't a mutt problem, but could someone give
| a suggestion of where to look?
What does the output of the shell
Why does everyone send signed emails to the list, is it always
necessary ?
It slows reading down, and digests dont look so nice ...
I can understand that certain things should be signed, but it
seems more than not are now signed.
Steve
--
NetTek Ltd Flat 2, 43 Howitt Road, Belsize Park,
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 12:52:25PM +, Steve Kennedy wrote:
Why does everyone send signed emails to the list, is it always
necessary ?
It slows reading down, and digests dont look so nice ...
I can understand that certain things should be signed, but it
seems more than not are now signed.
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 13:28:09 +0100
From: Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: set mail_check lies
I have the same problem, I only get my mail if I hit 'G'
What should $mailboxes be set to?
I had a look at the manual but couldn't really understand
Steven --
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
%
% Ahoy.
%
% Typicall I use mutt in an IMAP setting and am just now using it at
% home (they finally removed the chain and ball from my cubicle).
Welcome home :-)
%
% I'm using fetchmail to yank the mail and procmail to process it. That
%
Nick --
...and then Nick Wilson said...
%
% Hi folks
Hello!
% Firstly, yes, I know this is a trivial issue!
Well, it depends on your definition of trivial... If you mean easy, it
may not be; if you mean worthless, then it might be :-)
% I use vim as my editor and can't work out how to
Steve --
...and then Steve Kennedy said...
%
% Why does everyone send signed emails to the list, is it always
% necessary ?
It all depends on your point of view. I feel that it is and sign
everything except for mail to a few recipients (conveniently noted
by send-hooks, of course!).
%
%
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 01:13:59PM +0100, Michael Tatge wrote:
Philip Mak muttered:
set mail_check configures how often (in seconds) mutt should look
for new mail. I have it set to 5, but new e-mail that I receive does
*not* show up within 5 seconds.
It seems that it only shows up if
I was mistaken. I just tested several email addresses,
so I believe the problem is just with the gmx.net
domain. This is my output from the host-t mx command:
$ host -t mx gmx.net
gmx.net mail is handled (pri=10) by mx0.gmx.de
gmx.net mail is handled (pri=10) by mx0.gmx.net
--- René Clerc
Daniel Eisenbud [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I mean to get back to some threading loose ends in the next few
days, so I'll add a $hide_missing_parents option, or some such.
Terrific! Thanks, Daniel!
Sam
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020107 15:15]:
Nick --
...and then Nick Wilson said...
%
% Hi folks
Hello!
% Firstly, yes, I know this is a trivial issue!
Well, it depends on your definition of trivial... If you mean easy, it
may not be; if you mean worthless, then it might be
* Ricardo SIGNES [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020107 15:15]:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 12:52:25PM +, Steve Kennedy wrote:
Why does everyone send signed emails to the list, is it always
necessary ?
It slows reading down, and digests dont look so nice ...
I can understand that certain things
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 11:30:53AM +0800, Charles Jie wrote:
After reading Cliff's post and mutt's manual, I am not sure whether
Disposition-Notification-To: will do what I want.
I've read all the other arguments about whether read-receipts are a
good thing. Whether they are or not they are
Chris --
...and then Chris Gentle said...
%
% On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 11:30:53AM +0800, Charles Jie wrote:
%
% After reading Cliff's post and mutt's manual, I am not sure whether
% Disposition-Notification-To: will do what I want.
%
% I've read all the other arguments about whether
Nick --
...and then Nick Wilson said...
%
% * David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020107 15:15]:
%
% ...and then Nick Wilson said...
% %
% % I use vim as my editor and can't work out how to make portions of my
% % text bold? I know many of you use vim so I hope someone can help.
...
% To get
Hi all.
I have this line in .muttrc
set mbox=/home/nick/Mail/mbox
There is no file called mbox in Mail though?
Is this something to do with using pop3 rather than *local* mail?
Cheers
--
Nick Wilson
Tel:+45 3325 0688
Fax:+45 3325 0677
Web:www.explodingnet.com
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 16:33:56 +0100
From: Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mutt-Users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mbox trouble
Hi all.
I have this line in .muttrc
set mbox=/home/nick/Mail/mbox
There is no file called mbox in Mail though?
Is this something to do with using pop3
* Roman Neuhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020107 16:48]:
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 16:33:56 +0100
From: Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mutt-Users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mbox trouble
Hi all.
I have this line in .muttrc
set mbox=/home/nick/Mail/mbox
There is no file called
I thought I remembered seeing something about this in the list over the
last month, but I can't find it in the archives. Can someone tell me
how I can save an entire thread from my inbox to a different folder?
I thought I would just be able to tag the thread and save the tagged
messages, but I
Kenneth --
...and then Kenneth Pronovici said...
%
% I thought I remembered seeing something about this in the list over the
% last month, but I can't find it in the archives. Can someone tell me
I know it was there; I saw it, too -- or at least I saw something.
All I could find on a quick
* Kenneth Pronovici [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-01-07 10:02]:
I thought I remembered seeing something about this in the list over the
last month, but I can't find it in the archives. Can someone tell me
how I can save an entire thread from my inbox to a different folder?
I thought I would just
Hey people.
I just wanted to share a sentiment. At work I'm playing with Evolution
because of all of these nuts around me obsessed with M$
Lookout!. IMHO, Evolution 1.0 is not evolution at all, it's more
like a step backwards. I _greatly_ prefer my Mutt + Exim + Procmail +
Fetchmail setup to
Hi Dallam,
although I don't have a solution to your problem, I think that
debugging will become easier if you uninstall unnecessary software
like geheimnis and gpa. Mutt does not need them.
Have you made sure that your key is in the secret keyring, too? Try:
gpg --list-secret-keys
To me this
http://mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-6.html
tag-thread ESC t tag/untag all messages in the current thread
tag-prefix ; apply next command to tagged entries
Thanks, both of you. Had tag-prefix remapped and didn't realize it. That's
exactly what I needed.
KEN
--
Kenneth J.
So sprach »Steve Kennedy« am 2002-01-07 um 12:52:25 + :
Why does everyone send signed emails to the list, is it always
necessary ?
No, it's not. Personal mails and important mails should be signed
and/or encrypted. However mailinglist mails should not be encrypted,
because those mails
Kenneth Pronovici muttered:
Can someone tell me how I can save an entire thread from my inbox to a
different folder? I thought I would just be able to tag the thread
and save the tagged messages, but I can't figure out how to do that.
tag-thread esc-t
tag-prefix ;
save-message s
i.e.:
* Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020107 17:44]:
Hey people.
I just wanted to share a sentiment. At work I'm playing with Evolution
because of all of these nuts around me obsessed with M$
Lookout!. IMHO, Evolution 1.0 is not evolution at all, it's more
like a step backwards. I
Dear Alexander,
you have not signed your message, so all the remarks I am going to
make may not apply to the real Alexander Skwar. Maybe some villain
wanted to make Alexander look daft by forging that email.
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 05:36:43PM +0100, Alexander Skwar (?) wrote:
No, it's not.
Alexander Skwar writes:
So sprach »Steve Kennedy« am 2002-01-07 um 12:52:25 + :
Why does everyone send signed emails to the list, is it always
necessary ?
No, it's not. Personal mails and important mails should be signed
and/or encrypted. However mailinglist mails should not be
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 05:32:58PM +0100, Cristian wrote:
Hi Dallam,
although I don't have a solution to your problem, I think that
debugging will become easier if you uninstall unnecessary software
like geheimnis and gpa. Mutt does not need them.
You are correct I am sure, as I become more
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 01:52:19AM +0300, Im Eunjea wrote:
* Tom Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-01-06 00:53]:
(2)when replying to a message, look at the delivered-to, to, cc,
etc headers. If one of them is in the list from (1), set the From: header
to that. Otherwise set the From: value
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 01:20:08PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 05:04:25PM +, Tom Jones wrote:
[setting From: in replies depending on which of my addresses was a
rcpt of the original mail]
Sure. Set 'alternates' to a regular expression that describes all the
So sprach »Cristian« am 2002-01-07 um 18:03:24 +0100 :
you have not signed your message, so all the remarks I am going to
make may not apply to the real Alexander Skwar. Maybe some villain
wanted to make Alexander look daft by forging that email.
Even if so, it wouldn't matter much. Just
Hello mutters,
after using mutt more than three months now, I am very pleased with it.
It does nearly everything I want it to (and every day a bit more).
One thing I haven't found out until today, was an automated way of
finding maildir-style mailboxes. All solutions I found so far used
Hello,
I've been using Mutt for some time now (and really like it). I
decided I would try using a few mbox-hook's, and can't seem to get any
to work. Here are what I think are the relavant lines from my .muttrc:
set folder=~/mail
set move=ask-yes
mbox-hook =python-list =python-list-save
Just
I sometimes ssh into my machine from work and use Mutt. The
connection through the firewall, however, is, uh, a bit tenuous
and often gets dropped. Sometimes this happens when I am
composing a message. Is there a good way to recover these
compositions and pick up where I left off?
I'm using
On Mon, Jan 7, 2002, Samuel Padgett wrote:
I sometimes ssh into my machine from work and use Mutt. The
connection through the firewall, however, is, uh, a bit tenuous
and often gets dropped. Sometimes this happens when I am
composing a message. Is there a good way to recover these
Thus spake Alexander Skwar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Look into the archives and into the Web to find out why PGP is a
good thing.
Of course it's a good thing. No doubt about that. But not for
mailinglist mails. And also not for usenet news.
This has been discussed often on this and other
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 12:44:09PM -0500, Samuel Padgett wrote:
I sometimes ssh into my machine from work and use Mutt. The
connection through the firewall, however, is, uh, a bit tenuous
and often gets dropped. Sometimes this happens when I am
composing a message. Is there a good way to
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 12:43:02PM -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote:
I would say to look at it like a mailing list signature that you have no
say in. Perhaps you could make procmail remove it, or otherwise modify
the mail, but other than that I think that you will have to live with
people
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 05:05:39PM +, Lars Hecking wrote:
I have been on this list since 1997, and I'm unsubscribing because
- too many mails on the list are signed, which slows down processing
immensly
Why not just 'unset pgp_verify_sig'? That's what I do.
- there's just too
Gary Johnson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
- there's just too much noise
I don't know what to do about that, except to post less often myself.
Gary
And, ironically, he mailed the list to tell us why he's unsubscribing
instead of just unsubscribing. =)
--
Ben Reed a.k.a. Ranger Rick
On 2002.01.07, in [EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Nick Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes I mean /like/ HTML, but *not* HTML as I dump anything of nature
> also. I guess my understanding of real ASCII text is mistaken. I thought
> that because I saw bold text in mails sent to me (back when I was
>
[05.01.02 13:44 -0600] rhad -- :
running fetchmail ...
This in turn gave me lovely error output:
rhad-linux:/home/rhad # fetchmail -v --keep -a /var/log/fetchmail
fetchmail: SMTP connect to localhost failed
SMTP is a sendmail/alternate matter.
I am using postfix for this purpose, so I can't
[sab 05/01/2002, ore 12:57] = Aaron Schrab scrive:
At 11:33 +0100 05 Jan 2002, Franco Vite [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But: if I want to put the right signature when I replay (epmovi with
.signature.epmovi, default From with .signature and so on [I've many
accounts...]), how I can do?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I like Mutt's motto: All e-mail clients suck; mutt just sucks less.
And I used to believe it too, until I started trying to use GPG
regularly. I switched from Pine to mutt specifically for its built-in
support for PGP/GPG. But I found that either I
On 2002.01.07, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Benjamin Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gary Johnson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
- there's just too much noise
I don't know what to do about that, except to post less often myself.
And, ironically, he mailed the list to tell us why he's
On 2002.01.07, in 20020107113541.GA629@shanti,
Franco Vite [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
before my browser was
1 r L 29 dic [MaX] 0,3K Archivi ML PPC?
2 F 30 dic [Franco Vite] 0,8K
Now is
1 r L 29 dic [MaX] 0,3K Archivi ML PPC?
2 F 30 dic [To
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Erika Pacholleck hath spake thusly:
[05.01.02 13:44 -0600] rhad -- :
running fetchmail ...
This in turn gave me lovely error output:
rhad-linux:/home/rhad # fetchmail -v --keep -a /var/log/fetchmail
fetchmail: SMTP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, David Champion hath spake thusly:
This message is in enriched text. Here's some text in boldfaced type.
Here's italic. You can also do formatting -- you can
These worked for me (using mutt 1.3.22.1)
Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
vim -r will give you a list of recoverable temp files. Rarely fails
me.
Yes, but then how do I actually send the message. Cut-n-paste
into a new composition buffer?
I was hoping Mutt had some facility to notice /tmp/mutt-* files
that are unsent and
Gary Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A better way to handle this is to run screen on your work machine. Then
when your connection drops, simply re-logon to your work machine, run
'screen -r' to re-attach the screen session, and pick up where you left
off.
This is a really good idea.
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 12:53:05PM -0600, David Champion [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
On 2002.01.07, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Benjamin Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gary Johnson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
- there's just too much noise
I don't know what to do about that, except to
Derek D. Martin wrote:
There seems to be no way to make mutt include a forwarded message in
quoted text.
why not just reply and then change the 'To' header.
you can delete the 'in-reply-to' if you're worried about messing up
headers.
that said, it would be cool if there were 'forward_inline'
On Mon, Jan 7, 2002, Samuel Padgett wrote:
vim -r will give you a list of recoverable temp files. Rarely fails
me.
Yes, but then how do I actually send the message. Cut-n-paste
into a new composition buffer?
I was hoping Mutt had some facility to notice /tmp/mutt-* files
that are
Thus spake Will Yardley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
that said, it would be cool if there were 'forward_inline' and
'forward_quoted' options or something.
See $forward_quote :-)
--
Justin R. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
View my website at http://codesorcery.net
Please encrypt email using key 0xC9C40C31
- clearsigned and/or ascii-armored messages
Whether you guys like it or not, most of the rest of the world uses
clearsigning and ascii-armored plaintext messages. Mutt falls down
here. You apparently refuse to support this, which makes no sense
since the majority of the PGP-using
Hi all
I'm certain this is something I've done but just can't work out what.
I just spoke to my mum who said the email I'd sent had come through as
an attachment as opposed to in the body of the message when she opened
it?
Actually, two attachments one of which is the pgp sig. What would cause
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There seems to be no way to make mutt include a forwarded message in
quoted text. MUCH more often than not, that's the behavior I want, so
that I can comment on what the original writer wrote. Maybe a way
does exist, since it seems intuitive
Nick Wilson wrote:
Actually, two attachments one of which is the pgp sig. What would
cause my emails to be sent as attachments rather than inline(if that's
the right term)?
this is mutt's default behavior. you can do:
pgp_create_traditional
but this still sends it as
* Will Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020107 20:51]:
Nick Wilson wrote:
Actually, two attachments one of which is the pgp sig. What would
cause my emails to be sent as attachments rather than inline(if that's
the right term)?
this is mutt's default behavior. you can do:
At some point hitherto, mike ledoux hath spake thusly:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 01:40:30PM -0500, Derek D. Martin wrote:
There seems to be no way to make mutt include a forwarded message in
quoted text. MUCH more often than not, that's the behavior I want, so
that I can comment on what the
Forgot to mention the version of Mutt that I'm using (says it in the
headers, but here it is anyway):
1.2.5i
Thanks,
Ben
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 12:42:46PM -0500, Ben Logan wrote:
Hello,
I've been using Mutt for some time now (and really like it). I
decided I would try using a few
Ben Logan muttered:
I've been using Mutt for some time now (and really like it).
Welcome. :)
I decided I would try using a few mbox-hook's, and can't seem to get
any to work. Here are what I think are the relavant lines from my
.muttrc:
set folder=~/mail
set move=ask-yes
mbox-hook
Thus spake Nick Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Sorry, my post was unclear. I'm not really worried about the sig. It's
the fact that the body of the mail (like this text) was received as an
attatchment that she had to open.
That can't be right sure?
That is a result of Outlook not listening
Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AFAIK, it is up to the editor, not mutt. When in vim, go to
':help recover' and it will tell you what you need to know. IOW
you can do it right from within vim.
I guess my point is that there are a lot of manual steps here:
start new composition, use
Derek D. Martin wrote:
At some point hitherto, mike ledoux hath spake thusly:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 01:40:30PM -0500, Derek D. Martin wrote:
There seems to be no way to make mutt include a forwarded message
in quoted text. MUCH more often than not, that's the behavior I
want, so
About 2 weeks ago, I took the plunge and switched to mutt as my mail
reader. It took me several hours to read the documentation and
configure mutt so that I could use it adequately. I am sharing the
results of my efforts: My .muttrc and related configuration files,
heavily commented to explain
* Justin R. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020107 21:36]:
Thus spake Nick Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Sorry, my post was unclear. I'm not really worried about the sig. It's
the fact that the body of the mail (like this text) was received as an
attatchment that she had to open.
That can't
So sprach »Justin R. Miller« am 2002-01-07 um 12:43:02 -0500 :
the mail, but other than that I think that you will have to live with
people signing list mail.
Sure. However, now that you seem to have run out of arguments, please
remember how this thread started. Somebody asked about opions
On Sonntag, 06. Jan. 2002 at 20:53:24, MuttER wrote:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 08:30:05PM +0530, Prahlad Vaidyanathan wrote:
mailcap
text/html; w3m -T text/html %s
/mailcap
You could also add a 'copiousoutput' at the end of that, and set
auto_view text/html in your muttrc to put
On Mon, 07 Jan 2002 at 13:40:30 -0500, Derek D. Martin wrote:
Here's my current list of gripes:
- forwarded messages not included in quoting
There seems to be no way to make mutt include a forwarded message in
quoted text. MUCH more often than not, that's the behavior I want, so
that I
Sam --
...and then Samuel Padgett said...
%
% Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
%
% vim -r will give you a list of recoverable temp files. Rarely fails
% me.
%
% Yes, but then how do I actually send the message. Cut-n-paste
% into a new composition buffer?
Rather than cut-n-paste I
At 05:50 + 07 Jan 2002, Tom Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The trouble is that send-hook can only look at the message that's
about to be sent, not its parent. After a web trawl, it looks like
the patch described in the second half of this mail
Lars Hecking wrote:
Secondly, mutt also supports checking of traditionally signed email
(i.e. without conversion).
EscP check-traditional-pgp check for classic pgp
Months ago there was a thread how to do this automatically. But at that
time all tries didn't work; AFAIR there was
Nick --
...and then Nick Wilson said...
%
% * Justin R. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020107 21:36]:
% Thus spake Nick Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
%
% the fact that the body of the mail (like this text) was received as an
% attatchment that she had to open.
%
% That can't be right sure?
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 09:04:29PM +0100, Michael Tatge wrote:
Ben Logan muttered:
I've been using Mutt for some time now (and really like it).
Welcome. :)
Thanks.
=python-list is no regex. Leave out the =, then it should work.
Ah, yes. I tried just python-list first, (and even some
Thus spake Volker Moell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Months ago there was a thread how to do this automatically. But at
that time all tries didn't work; AFAIR there was a conceptual problem
(endless loops or so, I don't know exactly any more). Well, to read
one single mail I can hit Esc-P, but
Hi, all --
It appears that the recipient is now (1.3.25) provided as the default
subject. At least, as far as I can tell it is, and I even went back
to my completely-bare unpatched version to make sure. [From either
within mutt or the command line, when I start a new message to foo,
the
On Jan 07, David T-G [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
It appears that the recipient is now (1.3.25) provided as the default
subject. At least, as far as I can tell it is, and I even went back
to my completely-bare unpatched version to make sure. [From either
within mutt or the command line, when
* Derek D. Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [07-01-2002 20:59]:
| text/html; /usr/bin/lynx -force_html %s; needsterminal
| text/html; /usr/bin/lynx -dump -force_html %s; copiousoutput
|
| When I get HTML mail it automatically gets passed through lynx and
| displayed in Mutt's pager. When
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 08:50:16PM +0100, Michael Wagner wrote:
I have this in my mailcap file:
text/html; html2text %s; copiousoutput; nametemplate=%s.html
because the output is much better than this lynx or w3m. Try it.
The problem that I see with lynx, w3m and links is that the -dump
Derek D. Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hmmm... well, whenever I reply to a message, everything after
sigdashes is stripped from the message. It's possible that my editor
is doing this (I use post-mode for emacs), and I'll look into that.
I'm pretty sure that post-mode does this. You
Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I use vim as my editor and can't work out how to make portions of my
text bold? I know many of you use vim so I hope someone can help.
Some MUAs will display a^Ha (aa) as a bold a. Is this what
you mean?
Sam
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 10:16:58 -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
Why not just 'unset pgp_verify_sig'? That's what I do.
But is there an option to ask Mutt not to display garbage like
[-- La sortie PGP suit (heure courante : Tue Jan 8 00:13:02 2002) --]
gpg: Avertissement: l'utilisation de la
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
