14-Mar-02 at 23:34, Joel Hammer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
This really is way cool.
With KDE, I just dragged the script file onto my bottom panel. Now,
I just highlight the link in mutt, hit the icon on the bottom panel,
and netscape starts up, etc.
I thought you wanted to avoid a mouse
14-Mar-02 at 15:15, J. Scott Dorr ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
This does bring up in my mind a curious conundrum. The whole concept of apps
checking to see if the mailspool has new mail in it can/should be done in such
a way so that multiple apps can do it and not squash each others data. Not
I think I have the solution:
send-hook '~t .*' 'my_hdr From: Jerome De Greef [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
send-hook !'~t .*' 'my_hdr From: Jerome De Greef[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
The first hook is used whenever I hit 'r' and there is a 'To:' line
followed by any address.
The second hook is used when I hit 'F'
Hi,
I am using mutt to connect to the mail server to fetch mails. I need to
access
a pop mail account. When I configure Netscape to do it, I am able to
get through
to the server and access the mails. However, I am unable to connect to
the same
server (from the same machine on where I am able
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 16:03:05 -0600
David Champion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2002.02.23, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jerry Van Brimmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.
pop_authenticate: Using any available method.
AUTH CRAM-MD5
+
15-Mar-02 at 10:53, Kanagesh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
Hi,
pop://a.b.c.d
where a.b.c.d is the ip address of the mail server
when I telnet to port 101 of a.b.c.d, there is a reply saying 'OK'
I have configured mutt with --enable-pop option.
If this isn't a typo, and your POP server
* Prahlad Vaidyanathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-11-28 09:44:54 +0530]:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2001 christophe [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed
into the ether:
[-- snip --]
I should add, this works also for push commands (and it seems to
work for exec). I use the following in my .muttrc: folder-hook
subscribe
Simon --
...and then Simon White said...
%
% On an somewhat related note, I have a mutt icon in PNG format which is the
% right size for the bottom panel if KDE users want an icon to automatically
% launch Mutt (I use xterm -e mutt) from the panel.
Oooh! Gimme!
:-D
--
David T-G
Tim --
...and then Timothy Ball said...
%
% I know this is more of a procmail question, but no one on the procmail
% list seems to know or respond...
%
% I'm on a lot of mailing lists and I would like to strip out all the pgp
% sigs from messages but I don't know the correct kungfu to do this
Pat --
...and then pat said...
%
% Has traffic disappeared or do I have list problems?? Please cc: me at
% the reply-to address in header.
Things have been hoppingly healthy; I think it's you.
%
% tks
% --
% Pat Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535
%
Jerome --
...and then Jerome De Greef said...
%
% I think I have the solution:
Yay!
%
% send-hook '~t .*' 'my_hdr From: Jerome De Greef [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
% send-hook !'~t .*' 'my_hdr From: Jerome De Greef[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Does this work, or do you think it should? I'd expect that you'd
Hi all
First time poster, so please be gentle! :)
I have just upgraded from Outlook 2000 to Mutt.
Using the most recent version and starting mutt via mutt -y to default to the folder
list.
It shows me which folders have new mail in with the N character, but this never updates
unless I
a)
Hello,
I need some help with my muttrc. I'm still running 1.2.5 as I still can't
get the pager to work in 1.3.27...
I have 5 main e-mail addresses: [EMAIL PROTECTED], @x-ray.org,
@imprezaturbo.org, @euronet.nl and @euro.net.
I have set up different environments through folder-hooks in my
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [03-15-02 07:21] crowed:
Pat --
...and then pat said...
%
% Has traffic disappeared or do I have list problems?? Please cc: me at
% the reply-to address in header.
Things have been hoppingly healthy; I think it's you.
I believe that linuxfreemail.com had
Hi,
I'm using mutt to connect to a mail server. I can access my mail box
and
receive all mails, but when I try to send a mail, I am not able to. I
guess
mutt uses sendmail in the local system to SEND mails and POP to access
mails from the server (am I right??) . I am able to connect to the
On 15/03/02 Kanagesh did speaketh:
Hi,
I'm using mutt to connect to a mail server. I can access my mail box and
receive all mails, but when I try to send a mail, I am not able to. I guess
mutt uses sendmail in the local system to SEND mails and POP to access mails
from the server (am I
Kanagesh --
...and then Kanagesh said...
%
% Hi,
Hello!
%
% I'm using mutt to connect to a mail server. I can access my mail box
% and
% receive all mails, but when I try to send a mail, I am not able to. I
% guess
% mutt uses sendmail in the local system to SEND mails and POP to access
%
This one time, at band camp, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
Not for list-reply. The important thing to make this command work is
letting mutt know which mails are from lists, using the 'subscribe' and
'lists' commands.
Bleargh. What a pain in the ass. Most of my mailing lists identify
themselves
On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
On 15/03/02 Kanagesh did speaketh:
Hi,
I'm using mutt to connect to a mail server. I can access my mail box and
receive all mails, but when I try to send a mail, I am not able to. I guess
mutt uses sendmail in the local system to
Shawn --
...and then Shawn McMahon said...
%
% This one time, at band camp, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
%
% Not for list-reply. The important thing to make this command work is
% letting mutt know which mails are from lists, using the 'subscribe' and
% 'lists' commands.
%
% Bleargh. What a
On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, Kanagesh wrote:
Hi,
I'm using mutt to connect to a mail server. I can access my mail box
and
receive all mails, but when I try to send a mail, I am not able to. I
guess
mutt uses sendmail in the local system to SEND mails and POP to access
mails from the server
This one time, at band camp, David T-G wrote:
So, since lists are so easy to recognize, have a script that generates
mailing list names from your directories and put something like
Mailing lists aren't easy to recognize, at least when they don't
put in a header, but you're forgetting that
On Mar 15, Shawn McMahon [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
Not for list-reply. The important thing to make this command work is
letting mutt know which mails are from lists, using the 'subscribe' and
'lists' commands.
Bleargh. What a pain
* Shawn McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-15 09:41:11 -0500]:
Mailing lists aren't easy to recognize, at least when they don't put in a
header, but you're forgetting that this will only come up if the user hits
the list-reply key, thereby TELLING mutt that the email was from a list.
Perhaps
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 02:57:36PM +, Dave Pearson wrote:
* Shawn McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-15 09:41:11 -0500]:
Mailing lists aren't easy to recognize, at least when they don't put in a
header, but you're forgetting that this will only come up if the user hits
the list-reply
This one time, at band camp, Dave Pearson wrote:
Perhaps I'm missing something here but I don't use list-reply to tell mutt
that an email is from a mailing list, I use list-reply to tell mutt that I
want to respond to the list it was from (instead of to the author of the
email, or
Shawn --
...and then Shawn McMahon said...
%
% This one time, at band camp, Dave Pearson wrote:
%
% Perhaps I'm missing something here but I don't use list-reply to tell mutt
% that an email is from a mailing list, I use list-reply to tell mutt that I
% want to respond to the list it was
On Mar 15, Shawn McMahon [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Dave Pearson wrote:
Perhaps I'm missing something here but I don't use list-reply to tell mutt
that an email is from a mailing list, I use list-reply to tell mutt that I
want to respond to the list it was
* Shawn McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-15 10:17:37 -0500]:
This one time, at band camp, Dave Pearson wrote:
Perhaps I'm missing something here but I don't use list-reply to tell
mutt that an email is from a mailing list, I use list-reply to tell
mutt that I want to respond to the
This one time, at band camp, David T-G wrote:
BTW, subscribe is a superset of lists; you'll only need one for lists on
which you are and then one for lists on which you aren't.
Yeah, figured that one out after I posted. :-)
Great. Start coding. Post the result. TIA HAND
Trust me, you
Hi!
I found the following problem:
If I write an e-mail (charset iso-8859-1), I have no problems signing
the mail with gnupg.
If I attach another mail (message/rfc822, iso-8859-1) and sign it,
8bit characters get lost in the attachment.
This is reproducable if I launch mutt in an utf8 xterm.
A
Ok, I've got a send-hook like this:
send-hook ([EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]) set pgp_create_traditional
However, it still makes the MIME-type application:pgp.
Is there a way to make it lie and call them text?
Crackmonkey bounces funky MIME-types.
msg25576/pgp0.pgp
Description:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 04:34:58PM +0100, Pablo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I download mutt 1.2.5.1, and want to install on an SCO openserver 5.02.
download , untar were Ok, also configure run OK
but at the moment to execute MAKE INSTALL I got this long listing with a lot of
errors,
Can
Franco Vite [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
with 1.3.27 set sort_aux is on date-send
With 1.3.28 this command is unknow.
Hmm - at least my Mutt's (1.3.28) is working fine with these lines in
~/.muttrc:
folder-hook . set sort=threads
folder-hook . set sort_aux=date-sent
So,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Said Shawn McMahon on Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 12:38:02PM -0500:
Ok, I've got a send-hook like this:
send-hook ([EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]) set
pgp_create_traditional
However, it still makes the MIME-type application:pgp.
Is there
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 11:19:43AM -0600, Drew Raines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dominik Mierzejewski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What's in the last lines of configure.log?
$ tail -15 config.log
char **argv;
int main() {
return f (e, argv, 0) != argv[0] || f (e, argv, 1) !=
This one time, at band camp, Justin R. Miller wrote:
You need to either use a macro to pipe to gpg, or you need to try the
Outlook compatibility patch. I believe that the patch was going to be
rolled into the main distribution?
Maybe I'm misunderstanding things, but it seems to me that
Shawn --
...and then Shawn McMahon said...
%
% This one time, at band camp, Justin R. Miller wrote:
%
% You need to either use a macro to pipe to gpg, or you need to try the
% Outlook compatibility patch. I believe that the patch was going to be
...
%
% What am I missing here?
Please
Jerry --
...and then Jerry Van Brimmer said...
%
% Is there a way to tell Mutt to only download the new messages from the POP
% server?
Yes: tell it to use fetchmail :-)
I don't actually know, but I do know that mutt's pop implementation is
quite simple (by design).
%
% --
% Rev. 1:7 ;
Myrddin ---
...and then J. Scott Dorr said...
%
% On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 09:09:55AM +, Simon White wrote:
%
% Why do you need more than one app to check for new mail? Pick one that does
...
%
% Because most of the time, I'm ssh'd to home from work. I attach to a running
% screen
This one time, at band camp, David Champion wrote:
Personally, I don't like the idea of hard-coding mutt to recognize
mailing lists according to commonly-observed trends that aren't
specified by a reasonably standard standard. There are many ways
to identify a mailing list. Mutt shouldn't
* On 2002.03.15, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Brian C. Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am getting the following error when compiling 1.3.28
with gcc 3.0.4 (64-bit) mode.
Any ideas?
I don't know much about this particularly, but all the problems I've had
while using gcc 3.x were
* On 2002.03.15, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Shawn McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This one time, at band camp, David Champion wrote:
Personally, I don't like the idea of hard-coding mutt to recognize
mailing lists according to commonly-observed trends that aren't
specified by a
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 02:32:08PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
Well, you could always dump the mush client now that you have mutt ;-)
Why would I do that? :)
Also, I've been using mutt for quite a few years. It's only just now that
I'd grown weary enough of the (I thought) broken new mail
Myrddin --
...and then J. Scott Dorr said...
%
% On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 02:32:08PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
%
% Well, you could always dump the mush client now that you have mutt ;-)
%
% Why would I do that? :)
*grin*
%
% Also, I've been using mutt for quite a few years. It's only just
Hi David,
The only problem with that is that I don't think pre-3.0
versions can be built to be 64-bit compilers. That's not important for
mutt, but I would rather just have one compiler to maintain and not
multiple ones. Mutt is only package I have had a problem with so far
You may need to use vim, not vi. I tried to emulate your problem but
couldn't.
Have you got
set editor=vim -c 'set tw=72 et' '+/^$'
in your .muttrc.
HTH
Nick
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 11:22:26AM -0800, Brian C. Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am getting the following error when compiling 1.3.28
with gcc 3.0.4 (64-bit) mode.
[...]
gcc -DPKGDATADIR=\/usr/local/share/mutt\ -DSYSCONFDIR=\/usr/local/etc\
-DBINDIR=\/usr/local/bin\
I'm having some trouble sending my public keys to the keyserver that
I've setup in my ~/.gnupg/options (keyserver search.keyserver.net).
I can download keys without too much trouble, but I get this error
when I try to upload
gpg --send-keys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gpg: error sending to
Where does 'default' come from, as whether it gets recognized or not?
I ended up installing ncurses into my home directory and mutt built
perfectly. I reported this back the server admin and she said that
after looking into it, ncurses on the server was indeed screwed. She
said she reinstalled
On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, Ken Weingold wrote:
Where does 'default' come from, as whether it gets recognized or not?
for ncurses, it's implemented by the use_default_colors() function.
If the configure script doesn't find that, it won't compile-in the
support for default into mutt.
I ended up
Hi all,
Someone gave me a macro a while back to check every message for
PGP-ness. This works ok for local folders, but for IMAP it's really
s-l-o-w... Plus after leaving a message and going back to the index,
it seems mutt has forgotten about the PGP-ness of other messages
(i.e. I either need
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 01:45:40PM -0700, Steven Schneider wrote:
gpg --send-keys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gpg: error sending to 'search.keyserver.net': eof
Any ideas on what I'm doing wrongly, or is it the keyserver?
I've been having the same problems for a couple of weeks -- seems to be
flaky
I have just subscribed using a new email address but can't get the old
address unsubscribed, which is still forwarded to me, so I get two copies
of each msg.
I've tried changing the 'From:' line in mutt to the old subscription
address but the mailing list manager won't accept it.
What can I
On Mar 15, Derek D. Martin [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
This really isn't ideal. What I'd like to know is if there is a way
to tell mutt when I hit enter to enter a message, do an Esc-P
first. This way, the delay is much smaller and virtually
unnoticable. Really what I'd like is for mutt to
Because windows doesn't have an install script that works properly, you
may be wondering how to get stuff to work without it.
This is easily done with environmental variables. Set BTTC_ROOT_DIR to
the root dir of whichever source you are using. If you have a CVS
checkout, set it to the root of
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 11:57:44PM -0500, Derek D. Martin wrote:
hey, did you post this to the wrong list? You posted it to
mutt-users. Last I checked, mutt didn't have any use for python...
:)
Yes, I did.
Yes, I apologize.
(Yes, I am very ashamed... changing the alias mutt to
* Raymond A. Meijer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-15 13:14]:
I need some help with my muttrc. I'm still running 1.2.5
as I still can't get the pager to work in 1.3.27...
I have 5 main e-mail addresses: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
@x-ray.org, @imprezaturbo.org, @euronet.nl and @euro.net.
I have set up
OK, I'll bite. How do you tell fetchmail to download only new mail?
On Fri, 15 Mar 2002 14:15:49 -0500
David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jerry --
...and then Jerry Van Brimmer said...
%
% Is there a way to tell Mutt to only download the new messages from the POP
% server?
Yes: tell
On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 12:05:40AM -0800, Jerry Van Brimmer wrote:
OK, I'll bite. How do you tell fetchmail to download only new mail?
You don't tell fetchmail anything. If you care to read the manfile;
Disposal Options
-a, --all
(Keyword: fetchall) Retrieve both old
61 matches
Mail list logo
