On Monday 15 April 2002 22:41, Rocco Rutte wrote:
- Hmm, try replacing \n by enter:
-
- macro compose i :set ispell=...enter ...
Same old thing - a rapidly blinking cursor and what appears to be a freeze of
all Mutt functions.
Cheers,
Brian
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 11:50:09PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
Hi,
* Patrik Modesto [04/15/02 20:28:12 CEST] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 03:40:03PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
* Patrik Modesto [04/15/02 13:46:31 CEST] wrote:
I'm having problems with pgp_strict_enc. I want mutt to not
On aanother thread, Simon White writes:
I always hit L to reply to lists, and hope that Mutt will reply as
intended.
I'm generally very happy with mutt, but one thing I wish it would do,
which apparently pine and several of the Mac mailers can do, is
reply to lists without my having to update
Akkana wrote:
On aanother thread, Simon White writes:
I always hit L to reply to lists, and hope that Mutt will reply as
intended.
I'm generally very happy with mutt, but one thing I wish it would do,
which apparently pine and several of the Mac mailers can do, is reply
to lists
Hi,
* Patrik Modesto [04/16/02 08:33:01 CEST] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 11:50:09PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
In which character set do you send non-signed mail? Maybe your
$send_charset overides it?
I have
set send_charset=us-ascii:iso-8859-2:utf8
in my muttrc file. How can
There is this
Mail client test file v0.5 (55kb): This mbox file triggers some bugs
and has very long field values to trigger buffer overflows.
at http://kmail.kde.org/mail-client-QA.gz . Mutt doesn't crash, but
shows only 18 mails whereas kmail shows 20. I guess that has to do with
Hi,
* Brian Durant [04/16/02 08:39:12 CEST] wrote:
On Monday 15 April 2002 22:41, Rocco Rutte wrote:
- Hmm, try replacing \n by enter:
-
- macro compose i :set ispell=...enter ...
Same old thing - a rapidly blinking cursor and what appears to be a freeze of
all Mutt functions.
Hmm, then
On Tuesday 16 April 2002 15:11, Rocco Rutte wrote:
- Hmm, then probably your ispell doesn' behave as expected.
- Yours look like wrappers, so maybe they're wrong?
Umm sorry, I don't understand. My iSpell is a standard version that came with
the SuSE 7.3 Pro distro. Wrappers? What are you
Rocco Rutte ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
Hi,
* Brian Durant [04/16/02 08:39:12 CEST] wrote:
On Monday 15 April 2002 22:41, Rocco Rutte wrote:
- Hmm, try replacing \n by enter:
-
- macro compose i :set ispell=...enter ...
Same old thing - a rapidly blinking cursor and what appears
Volker Kuhlmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
Mail client test file v0.5 (55kb): This mbox file triggers some bugs
and has very long field values to trigger buffer overflows.
at http://kmail.kde.org/mail-client-QA.gz . Mutt doesn't crash, but
shows only 18 mails whereas kmail shows 20.
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 04:09:25PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
Michael Tatge wrote:
Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
I found these problems for which I know *no* 100% workaround:
- I'm unable to browse Maildirs reliably. They can contain both messages
and
begin Will Yardley quotation:
how is mutt supposed to know which addresses are mailing lists and which
aren't?
IMHO, if you hit list-reply and Mutt doesn't recognize a list, it
should assume you know what you're talking about, and pop up the To:
address as a yes/no default. Then if you say
Is there a way to tell mutt to just reply to the address in the To
line (or, perhaps, in the To or Cc line) and not to the sender?
how would mutt pick which? it's not psychic.
If a message said:
From: Alice
To: A list
the request is for a command which will initiate a reply to A list
* Shawn McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Apr 16. 2002 15:12]:
Alternately, just do the To:, and ignore the Cc:, because people
shouldn't be Cc:ing lists. But that may just be me.
But they do. A LOT.
--
Mads Martin Jørgensen, http://mmj.dk
Why make things difficult, when it is possible to make
Michal --
...and then Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek said...
%
% On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 04:09:25PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
% Michael Tatge wrote:
% Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
%
...
%- I'm unable to browse Maildirs reliably. They can contain both messages
%
Hardy --
...and then Hardy Merrill said...
%
...
%~/.mutt/tmp/mutt-merrill-1234-0 [#1] modified. Update encoding? ([y]/n):
%
% Am I doing something wrong, or have a forgotten something in the
% config of mutt?
This just came up recently; you can check the archives for the full
discussion.
Eduardo --
...and then Eduardo Gargiulo said...
%
% Hi all.
Hello!
%
% Which variable should i edit to customize the lines
%
% - Forwarded message from x xx@xx ---
% .
% - End forwarded message -
%
% appended when i forward a message? I want to remove the From: header.
Will --
...and then Will Yardley said...
%
% perhaps it's time (past time???) to take this discussion off list?
Maybe, but maybe not. I don't think we've pinned it down to a not-mutt
problem. Frankly I don't know what the heck is going on.
Personally I hope it doesn't leave mutt-users
David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
Eduardo --
%
% Which variable should i edit to customize the lines
%
% - Forwarded message from x xx@xx ---
% .
% - End forwarded message -
%
% appended when i forward a message? I want to remove the From: header.
If you
begin David T-G quotation:
Personally I hope it doesn't leave mutt-users unless someone (I volunteer)
sets up a temporary mutt-and-gpg-verification-problems list to get to
the bottom of it and keep me in the loop. I certainly want to get it
resolved.
When it is resolved, we want it in
* mutt-users [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-16 00:26 +0200]:
I manged to configure my mutt to read my mails from the exchange
server,
via mapi or imap protocol?
I am running: Debian Linux woddy kernel 2.4.7 with imaptool 0.9-4
$ apt-cache search imaptool
imaptool - A tool for creating
* Eduardo Gargiulo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-16 10:26:43 -0300]:
Which variable should i edit to customize the lines
- Forwarded message from x xx@xx ---
.
- End forwarded message -
appended when i forward a message? I want to remove the From: header.
You can't.
Michael, et al --
...and then Michael Tatge said...
%
% David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
% Eduardo --
% %
% % Which variable should i edit to customize the lines
% %
% % - Forwarded message from x xx@xx ---
% % .
% % - End forwarded message -
% %
% %
Moin,
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-04-16 15:30]:
Maybe, but maybe not. I don't think we've pinned it down to a not-mutt
problem. Frankly I don't know what the heck is going on.
It's not Fetchmail. I use 5.9.11 now, which seems to be the latest
version, but I cannot verify David's mail.
Shawn --
...and then Shawn McMahon said...
%
% begin David T-G quotation:
%
% Personally I hope it doesn't leave mutt-users unless someone (I volunteer)
% sets up a temporary mutt-and-gpg-verification-problems@ list to get to
% the bottom of it and keep me in the loop. I certainly want
begin Thorsten Haude quotation:
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-04-16 15:30]:
Maybe, but maybe not. I don't think we've pinned it down to a not-mutt
problem. Frankly I don't know what the heck is going on.
It's not Fetchmail. I use 5.9.11 now, which seems to be the latest
version, but
Hi,
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-04-16 15:30]:
Maybe, but maybe not. I don't think we've pinned it down to a not-mutt
problem. Frankly I don't know what the heck is going on.
I couldn't verify *any* of the mails I got from you today.
Thorsten
--
Nichts ist schwerer und erfordert mehr
Shawn, et al --
...and then Shawn McMahon said...
%
% begin Thorsten Haude quotation:
%
% It's not Fetchmail. I use 5.9.11 now, which seems to be the latest
% version, but I cannot verify David's mail.
%
% Well, it's not unusual to have an occasional unverifiable mail, but for
% it to be
16-Apr-02 at 08:27, David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
...and then Eduardo Gargiulo said...
%
% Which variable should i edit to customize the lines
%
% - Forwarded message from x xx@xx ---
% .
% - End forwarded message -
%
% appended when i forward a message? I
David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
Shawn, et al --
...and then Shawn McMahon said...
%
% Well, it's not unusual to have an occasional unverifiable mail, but for
% it to be so consistent for you, it almost has to be somewhere in your
% MTA path, not your MUA, since nobody else is
begin David T-G quotation:
I tried this method, using my editor to write everything from the last
^From_ line down to the bottom of the folder out to a file, but couldn't
get gpg to do anything with it:
Argh. I forgot PGP/MIME. That method I said will only work with inline
sigs.
Score
Shawn --
...and then Shawn McMahon said...
%
% begin David T-G quotation:
%
% I tried this method, using my editor to write everything from the last
% ^From_ line down to the bottom of the folder out to a file, but couldn't
% get gpg to do anything with it:
%
% Argh. I forgot PGP/MIME.
Michael, et al --
...and then Michael Tatge said...
%
% David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
...
%
% I don't know that I'd say that. I cannot verify my own messages in my
% own =mutt-users fcc folder.
...
%[zero] [9:39am] ~ gpg --verify /tmp/m
%gpg: no signed data
%gpg:
Eduardo --
...and then Eduardo Gargiulo said...
%
% Hi all.
Hello!
%
% I have the following lines in my muttrc
That usually goes in the system Muttrc file. Are they in there, too?
%
% # Show documentation when pressing F1
% macro generic f1 !less /usr/local/doc/mutt/manual.txt\n Show
David T-G [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Hardy --
...and then Hardy Merrill said...
%
...
%~/.mutt/tmp/mutt-merrill-1234-0 [#1] modified. Update encoding? ([y]/n):
%
% Am I doing something wrong, or have a forgotten something in the
% config of mutt?
This just came up recently; you
* Eduardo Gargiulo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-04-16 17:20]:
# Show documentation when pressing F1
macro generic f1 !less /usr/local/doc/mutt/manual.txt\n Show Mutt documentation
^
but when i hit F1, the macro don't work and mutt says 'Key is not
^
I use F1 and that
David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That usually goes in the system Muttrc file. Are they in there, too?
i added manually.
How very odd. So it doesn't show up in the help listing under '?', I
presume.
right.
What happens if you paste in ':macro index ...' in a running mutt? Is it
Thorsten Haude [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Eduardo Gargiulo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-04-16 17:20]:
# Show documentation when pressing F1
macro generic f1 !less /usr/local/doc/mutt/manual.txt\n Show Mutt
documentation
^
but when i hit F1, the macro don't work and mutt says 'Key
* Eduardo Gargiulo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-16 12:20:32 -0300]:
I have the following lines in my muttrc
# Show documentation when pressing F1
macro generic f1 !less /usr/local/doc/mutt/manual.txt\n Show Mutt documentation
macro index f1 !less /usr/local/doc/mutt/manual.txt\n Show Mutt
Hardy --
...and then Hardy Merrill said...
%
% David T-G [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
%
...
% This just came up recently; you can check the archives for the full
% discussion. Is your home dir NFS mounted and are you experience clock
% difference problems between machines?
%
% Yes, that's
Eduardo --
...and then Eduardo Gargiulo said...
%
% David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
%
% That usually goes in the system Muttrc file. Are they in there, too?
%
% i added manually.
OK. But are they in the system Muttrc file?
%
% How very odd. So it doesn't show up in the help
Thorsten, et al --
...and then Thorsten Haude said...
%
% * Eduardo Gargiulo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-04-16 17:20]:
% # Show documentation when pressing F1
% macro generic f1 !less /usr/local/doc/mutt/manual.txt\n Show Mutt
documentation
% ^
% but when i hit F1, the macro don't
On 04/15/02, 06:33:32PM +1200, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
Snip out any two consecutive messages from the file and attach them to a
reply to the list. I'm sure someone can come up with a quick hack that
will [re?]build ^From_ lines for you.
Yes, that hack is very simple:
man formail
man
David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eduardo --
...and then Eduardo Gargiulo said...
%
% David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
%
% That usually goes in the system Muttrc file. Are they in there, too?
%
% i added manually.
OK. But are they in the system Muttrc file?
yes. Now, i
I don't know why sort_browser=unsorted (as-is) equals
sort_browser=reverse-unsorted (shouldn't it read 'si-sa'?).
The reverse- prefix does nothing here, and the docs doesn't
state that. Moreover, the help scrn at the browser, shows
options o and O, but also doesn't help.
I know, it's not quite
Michael Tatge wrote:
From bla [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 15 20:37:05 2000
X-From_: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 15 20:36:34 2000
Subject: HTML only
Guess it does not recognize the two ^From_ lines because of the special
format. All other ^From_ lines look like this:
Mutt expects the address
On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 11:53:57AM -0400, John P Verel wrote:
David,
As suggested, here's the first two messages from the file. The messages
bodies, which were just plain text, are omitted for confidentiality:
From: Robert F. Hugi [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 02,
How can I search a string or go to a folder with new emails in file browser?
The / command seems to be working in a different way as that in index.
Thanks.
--
Bo Peng
Department of Statistics
Rice University
http://www.stat.rice.edu/~bpeng
David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
% David I know you use several keyrings. If I uncomment all keyring lines
% in my options file I can verify any mail just fine.
% Without those lines the gpg output shows that the sigs are verified, but
% mutt says they can not be verified.
Eduardo --
...and then Eduardo Gargiulo said...
%
% David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
%
% ...and then Eduardo Gargiulo said...
% %
...
% OK. But are they in the system Muttrc file?
%
% yes. Now, i have removed the macros from muttrc, but they are still not
% working.
It was unlikely,
Michael, et al --
...and then Michael Tatge said...
%
% David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
% % David I know you use several keyrings. If I uncomment all keyring lines
% % in my options file I can verify any mail just fine.
% % Without those lines the gpg output shows that the sigs are
David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
% Let's see if you can define any macros at all. What if you change the
% key from f1 to ,m or some such; does it show up then?
%
% ok. With f1 or F1 the macro didn't work, but with ,m yes! I see a
% message 'Shell command: less
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-16 08:32 (CEST)]
While that sounds like a good idea in general, I don't think it's the
real problem. I get my mail delivered right here and I couldn't verify
the sig on this message, Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
ironically enough.
Signed Mon 15 Apr
Eduardo --
...and then Eduardo Gargiulo said...
%
% David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
%
% Quite interesting. And did you define your ,m macro with a \n at the
% end, or do we *expect* that you'd have to hit return?
%
% i forgot to append \n.
Good enough; we expect it and so we don't
David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
%
% Have you checked to see how it would pass a keypress of f1 outside of mutt?
% What if you
%
%echo ^Vf1 | cat -v
%
% ^[[11~ (hmmm)
OK... When I send an F1 from my NT4 box running Putty v0.51 I get
^[OP
and the macros work for
Eduardo --
...and then Eduardo Gargiulo said...
%
% David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
% %
...
% and the macros work for me... When I go to the settings for keyboard, I
% have Function keys set to send ESC(n~ rather than Linux, Xterm, or
% VT400... How about you?
%
% idem settings, idem
* Eduardo Gargiulo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-16 14:07:07 -0300]:
i'm not right on the mutt box. I'm connected through ssh using PuTTY
client.
My settings are:
function keys and keypad=Xterm R6
Have you checked to see how it would pass a keypress of f1 outside of mutt?
What if you
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-16 13:42:51 -0500]:
%
% Just for fun, what if you leave your f1 macro binding but manually
% type my key sequence?
%
% 'Key is not bound'
My guess is that we've exhausted the terminal side and it has something
to do with the termcap/terminfo on
* Michael Tatge [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-16 20:58:08 +0200]:
Nicolas Rachinsky ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
* Eduardo Gargiulo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-16 14:07:07 -0300]:
i'm not right on the mutt box. I'm connected through ssh using PuTTY
client.
My settings are:
function
Hi,
* Brian Durant [04/16/02 11:37:37 CEST] wrote:
On Tuesday 16 April 2002 15:11, Rocco Rutte wrote:
- Hmm, then probably your ispell doesn' behave as expected.
- Yours look like wrappers, so maybe they're wrong?
Umm sorry, I don't understand. My iSpell is a standard version that came with
Michael,
Thank you very much for your response and awk script. Much obliged.
I am a complete newbie to awk (although I do have the Dougherty and
Robbins text on sed and awk on hand).
When I execute awk with the script as you instruct, it creates an output
file that is unchanged from the
Hi,
* Michael Tatge [04/16/02 11:38:00 CEST] wrote:
Rocco Rutte ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
Hi,
* Brian Durant [04/16/02 08:39:12 CEST] wrote:
On Monday 15 April 2002 22:41, Rocco Rutte wrote:
- Hmm, try replacing \n by enter:
-
- macro compose i :set ispell=...enter ...
Nicolas Rachinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Eduardo Gargiulo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-16 14:07:07 -0300]:
i'm not right on the mutt box. I'm connected through ssh using PuTTY
client.
My settings are:
function keys and keypad=Xterm R6
Have you checked to see how it would pass a
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
* Michael Tatge [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-16 20:58:08 +0200]:
Nicolas Rachinsky ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
* Eduardo Gargiulo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-16 14:07:07 -0300]:
i'm not right on the mutt box. I'm connected through ssh using
* Thomas E. Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-16 15:45:37 -0400]:
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
PS: using FreeBSD 4.5 with a termcap entry based on xterm-color.
FreeBSD maintainers (?) insist on using xterm-color, though it does not
closely match XFree86 xterm. It's an
Nicolas Rachinsky ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
* Michael Tatge [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-16 20:58:08 +0200]:
Nicolas Rachinsky ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
* Eduardo Gargiulo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-16 14:07:07 -0300]:
i'm not right on the mutt box. I'm connected through ssh using
I have two domains registered, domain1.com and domain2.com for instance. I
want to change the From: headers depending on which domain people send me
email to. So if people send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], i want to reply with a
From: header of [EMAIL PROTECTED] I want to do the same thing for
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
* Thomas E. Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-16 15:45:37 -0400]:
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
PS: using FreeBSD 4.5 with a termcap entry based on xterm-color.
FreeBSD maintainers (?) insist on using xterm-color, though it
Russell --
...and then Russell A. Khurshudian said...
%
% want to change the From: headers depending on which domain people send me
...
% Is it possible to use hooks to accomplish this? If so, how? Is there an
% easier way of going about doing this, otherwise? Thanks for the help.
See
if the recipient is annoyed at getting two copies of the message, they
should just use the one-line procmail/formmail solution to remove duplicate
messages.
How does this delete the personal copy, but not the list copy?
Volker
--
Volker Kuhlmann is possibly list0570 with
Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
How does this delete the personal copy, but not the list copy?
Both messages will have the same Message-ID field in the header.
Hi all,
I've just been through some frustration finding out why mutt and kmail
just don't want to cooperate (bug 41008 at bugs.kde.org).
The upshot of that seems to be that Content-Length: is a non-standard
extension, with RFC saying it's deprecated (if not discouraged).
There's a big rant
--gKMricLos+KVdGMg
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! Michael Elkins spake thus:
Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
How does this delete the personal copy, but not the list copy?
=20
Both messages will have the same
Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
Michael Elkins wrote:
Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
How does this delete the personal copy, but not the list copy?
Both messages will have the same Message-ID field in the header.
Actually, I think Volker was asking Is it possible to make this
delete the personal
On Wednesday 17 April 2002 01:52, Rocco Rutte wrote:
- Btw, how do you want to call your spelling checker? The key
- 'i' is by default bound to ispell and you changed it to
- something just setting ispell.
-
I just want to distinguish between i which is the default English
dictionary (as it
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 02:51:56PM +0200, Thorsten Haude wrote:
Hi,
* Kai Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-04-11 14:32]:
I am just reorganzing my mail sorting and filtering. I now use a
structure like that:
Mail/list/mutt-users
Mail/list/debian-users
Mail/mail/inbox
76 matches
Mail list logo
