On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 07:49:40PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Top posting sends the message I am so much more important than all
several hundred of you others on this list that I don't care how much of
your time I waste.
Bottom posting says I respect the others on this list and I will
Hi,
I'd like to write a hook that triggers after I've typed an email, matches
on '~b attached.is.', and runs a script which prompts is big letters,
Are you SURE you've attached it?.
What's preventing me from implementing this quantum leap in mailer
technology is the seeming lack of a hook to do
Howdy all,
I am using mutt to acess an IMAP mailbox on a remote machine through a
ssh tunnel. However every time I try to sign my mail I get
Can't open PGP subprocess!: No such file or directory (errno = 2)
I am not sure why this is happening. Both the server and the client
have gpg. I can
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 01:37:20AM -0400, Paul Brannan wrote:
BTW, why did this post show up in my inbox rather than in my mutt
folder? My procmailrc searches for ^TO.*mutt-users, but mutt-users
doesn't seem to be anywhere in the headers (unless I missed it somehow).
What part of the header
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 08:25:40PM -0700, David Ellement wrote:
On 020905, at 18:41:18, Gary Johnson wrote
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 05:57:24PM -0400, Michael Herman wrote:
Is there a way to forward e-mails in-line but any attachments are
attached to the forward?
For example, If I
Jeff Turner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
I'd like to write a hook that triggers after I've typed an email, matches
on '~b attached.is.', and runs a script which prompts is big letters,
Are you SURE you've attached it?.
Sorry can't help you with that.
Another scenario for such a hook is
On Wed, 04 Sep 2002 the mental interface of Elimar Riesebieter told:
Hi all,
one of my colorsets is
color hdrdefault blackcyan
I compiled the unpatched source from mutt.org against slang
(--with-slang) and now it works. There is only one thing to solve:
Can't use ACF now,
On Fri, 06 Sep 2002 the mental interface of Elimar Riesebieter told:
On Wed, 04 Sep 2002 the mental interface of Elimar Riesebieter told:
Hi all,
one of my colorsets is
color hdrdefault blackcyan
I compiled the unpatched source from mutt.org against slang
Hi all,
I compiled unpatched sources from mutt.org against slang. This was
to have a full background colored headerline! But now I can not view
the pager with ACS trees. I have to switch to set ascii_chars in
muttrc.
The version of slang I am using is:
ii slang1 1.4.5-1
ii
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
Hi all,
I compiled unpatched sources from mutt.org against slang. This was
to have a full background colored headerline! But now I can not view
the pager with ACS trees. I have to switch to set ascii_chars in
muttrc.
my impression (haven't
On Fri, 06 Sep 2002 the mental interface of Thomas E. Dickey told:
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
Hi all,
I compiled unpatched sources from mutt.org against slang. This was
to have a full background colored headerline! But now I can not view
the pager with ACS trees.
Jeff --
BTW, you should use the @mutt.org address for the mutt-users list rather
than the @gbnet address. Yes, the gbnet address leaks out now and again
(I don't really know how, but think it might be digest-related), but
we're trying to get it squashed once and for all.
...and then Jeff
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 10:10:31AM +0100, Sam Bashton wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 01:37:20AM -0400, Paul Brannan wrote:
BTW, why did this post show up in my inbox rather than in my mutt
folder? My procmailrc searches for ^TO.*mutt-users, but mutt-users
doesn't seem to be anywhere in
Paul, et al --
...and then Paul Brannan said...
%
% On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 07:49:40PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
% Top posting sends the message I am so much more important than all
...
% Bottom posting says I respect the others on this list and I will take a
...
%
% I disagree. While
Greg --
...and then Gregory Seidman said...
%
...
% When I run mutt -f imap://server/ it asks for my username and password,
% then tells me that the login failed. The username and password are right,
I've seen this once or twice, and not even with an Exchange server (ick).
My problem was that
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
On Fri, 06 Sep 2002 the mental interface of Thomas E. Dickey told:
otoh, ncursesw does support Unicode/UTF-8 line-drawing...
perhaps it would be simpler to just patch mutt to add the extra places to
fill in the background.
[...]
Is there a
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 01:37:20AM -0400, Paul Brannan wrote:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 07:49:40PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Top posting sends the message I am so much more important than all
several hundred of you others on this list that I don't care how much of
your time I waste.
Michael --
...and then Michael Herman said...
%
% I have a couple of questions about a couple of things.
You listed more than a couple. Can we charge you extra? :-) I'm only
going to answer a couple until you pay the extra baggage fee ;-)
%
...
% 2. When I receive an e-mail from someone
* Paul Brannan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-06 09:03]:
if someone sends you a long email (and it is necessary
and/or appropriate to quote the email or a large portion
of it), then replying at the top saves the reader the
time of scrolling to the bottom to find the reply.
so you top-post
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 07:46:28AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
Michael --
...and then Michael Herman said...
%
% I have a couple of questions about a couple of things.
You listed more than a couple. Can we charge you extra? :-) I'm only
going to answer a couple until you pay the extra baggage
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-06 11:52]:
I also notice that neither list-reply nor group-reply works
with the post I am responding to; I had to paste mutt-users
into the Cc: line to reply to the list. Any ideas why?
List reply ? there's a LIST REPLY ? Time for more
* David Thorburn-Gundlach [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-06]:
Can you verify that a test message that meets these requirements ..
Once you have such a message in hand, please gzip it and forward it
to the list along with screen clips ...
argh! NO! do *not* attach screen clips to your message.
On Fri, 06 Sep 2002 the mental interface of Thomas E. Dickey told:
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
On Fri, 06 Sep 2002 the mental interface of Thomas E. Dickey told:
otoh, ncursesw does support Unicode/UTF-8 line-drawing...
perhaps it would be simpler to just patch
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-05 20:47]:
* darren chamberlain [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-05 15:37]:
Look at display_filter, section 6.3.36 in the manual
(http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-6.html#display_filter).
Set it to a script that does something like:
cat | sed -e
* Michael Herman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-06 12:06]:
% I have a couple of questions about a couple of things.
You listed more than a couple. Can we charge you extra? I'm only
going to answer a couple until you pay the extra baggage fee ;-)
To whom do I make out the check? :-)
send it to
* Frederick Grim [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-06 09:19]:
I am using mutt to acess an IMAP mailbox on a remote machine through a
ssh tunnel. However every time I try to sign my mail I get
Can't open PGP subprocess!: No such file or directory (errno = 2)
I am not sure why this is happening.
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
On Fri, 06 Sep 2002 the mental interface of Thomas E. Dickey told:
I haven't made one. Perhaps it's about time. This topic comes up
occasionally, and since I'm in the process of checking the pre-release,
it's a good idea to work on this end
Thomas E. Dickey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
my impression (haven't seen any comments that this is fixed yet) is that
the slang UTF-8 package doesn't work for line-drawing characters. There
were some patches to hardcode the corresponding UTF-8 strings which may
make it usable.
Yeah, the
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 02:21:58AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
um, how exactly do you go through a signed message?
do you view the message with display-message?
Yes.
do you have pgp_verify_sig set?
Yes. The screen goes offbalance when gpg is invoked and returns
something like:
not a valid
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Thomas E. Dickey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
my impression (haven't seen any comments that this is fixed yet) is that
the slang UTF-8 package doesn't work for line-drawing characters. There
were some patches to hardcode the corresponding UTF-8
* Pedro Alves [EMAIL PROTECTED] [06-09-2002 16:56]:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 02:21:58AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
Mail-Followup-To: Pedro Alves [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Mutt Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
are you not susbcribed to the list? (see sig)
Yes I am. I don't
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 04:28:27AM -0700, David T-G wrote:
Jeff --
BTW, you should use the @mutt.org address for the mutt-users list rather
than the @gbnet address. Yes, the gbnet address leaks out now and again
(I don't really know how, but think it might be digest-related), but
we're
On 020906, at 02:11:08, Gary Johnson wrote
[...] However, if I forward a
message with the same body but with an application/excel attachment,
mutt includes both parts in the body of the forwarding message since my
mailcap has a rule for converting Excel attachments to text and my
muttrc
I'm attaching three files:
rep1k (quoted -- this is what came up). This is the first 1K
of the PDF that misbehaved, and it decided wrong.
rep.5k (8bit -- this is what came up, so it guessed right).
This is only the first 512 bytes of the PDF.
rep1k, forced to use base64 encoding, so
On 09/05/02 18:41 -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
To forward messages that way, you need to go to the attachment menu
('v'), tag all the attachments ('t'), then forward them all using ';f'.
Doesn't esc e simply do what is wanted? I tried it with an excel
spreadsheet and it seems to work just
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 02:03:00PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-06 11:52]:
List reply ? there's a LIST REPLY ? Time for more RTM !
argh!
hee hee, you are SO easy to tweak! :)
(I'm afraid Elm is still programmed into my fingers, just like
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 02:30:12PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someday Sven will realize that mutt is a tool, not a religion. (maybe.. )
(Now where did I put my flameproof suit / )
Oh, I doubt it. We'll probably have self-appointed net cops with us as long as
there's a net. Just watch
Hm. I have 1.2.5 source locally, and it looks like in
mutt_set_encoding() in sendlib.c, the following logic may be
faulty:
static void mutt_set_encoding (BODY *b, CONTENT *info)
{
if (b-type == TYPETEXT)
{
if (info-lobin || info-linemax 990 || (info-from
option
1. With mutt 1.4, I get white letters and black background. I had to set
COLORFGBG=default;default for the behaviour of mutt 1.2.
Only 8 colors are supported by mutt. Using only those 8 colors hardly
enhances legibility, are there any plans to enhance this functionality?
2. Why not include
On Fri, 06 Sep 2002, Paul Brannan wrote:
folder? My procmailrc searches for ^TO.*mutt-users, but mutt-users
doesn't seem to be anywhere in the headers (unless I missed it somehow).
Try this:
:0:
* ^TO_mutt-users@mutt\.org
mutt
:0:
* ^TO_mutt-users@gbnet\.net
mutt
:0:
*
* Oliver Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-06 20:09]:
Try this:
:0:
* ^TO_mutt-users@mutt\.org
mutt
:0:
* ^TO_mutt-users@gbnet\.net
mutt
:0:
* ^TO_mutt-announce@mutt\.org
mutt
or this:
:0:
* ^TO_mutt-(announce|users)@(mutt\.org|gbnet\.net)
mutt
Sven
On Fri, 06 Sep 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
* Oliver Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-06 20:09]:
Try this:
:0:
* ^TO_mutt-users@mutt\.org
mutt
:0:
* ^TO_mutt-users@gbnet\.net
mutt
:0:
* ^TO_mutt-announce@mutt\.org
mutt
or this:
:0:
*
On Fri, 06 Sep 2002 the mental interface of Oliver Fuchs told:
On Fri, 06 Sep 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
[...]
or this:
:0:
* ^TO_mutt-(announce|users)(mutt\.org|gbnet\.net)
mutt
Sven
but also this in .muttrc:
set followup_to=yes
^^^
On Sat, 07 Sep 2002, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
On Fri, 06 Sep 2002 the mental interface of Oliver Fuchs told:
On Fri, 06 Sep 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
[...]
or this:
:0:
* ^TO_mutt-(announce|users)(mutt\.org|gbnet\.net)
mutt
Sven
but also this in
On Sat, 07 Sep 2002 the mental interface of Oliver Fuchs told:
[...]
Absolutely ... who wrote this?
Banned from the list.
No, banned from the pubs.
Skoal!
Elimar
--
Planung:
Ersatz des Zufalls durch den Irrtum.
-unknown-
msg30787/pgp0.pgp
At 1:37 AM EDT on September 6 Paul Brannan sent off:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 07:49:40PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I disagree. While bottom posting is appropriate for most public forums
(because discussions on these forums generally involve a point-by-point
debate), there is a valid
More out of curiosity than anything, does anyone know the status of
mixmaster and it's ability to work within mutt?
I've been using mutt on a Red Hat box, and just recently switched over
to Debian. The default apt-get for mutt had mixmaster as a choice up
with the headers, so I started trying
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-06 13:54 +0200]:
* Paul Brannan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-06 09:03]:
What part of the header should I be filtering on?
using TO is fine.
In my experience, it's best to find a header set by the list processing
software and filter on that header.
Brian Grayson wrote:
Hm. I have 1.2.5 source locally, and it looks like in
mutt_set_encoding() in sendlib.c, the following logic may be
faulty:
I just noticed that you are using an extremely ancient version of Mutt
(0.95). Please try using Mutt 1.4, which is the current stable version.
49 matches
Mail list logo
