Re: sending email to txt

2010-08-03 Thread rogerx
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 09:46:55AM -0400, Tim Gray wrote: On Aug 02, 2010 at 08:27 AM -0400, Tim Gray wrote: On Aug 01, 2010 at 10:26 PM -0800, rog...@sdf.org wrote: Nope. Doesn't work here. I don't know. It worked the other day for me. Here's the complete list from wiki:

Re: sending an email with a mutt one-line without being prompted

2010-08-03 Thread Christoph Kukulies
Am 02.08.2010 23:13, schrieb Will Fiveash: On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 03:49:47PM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote: On Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 10:52:01PM -0500, David Champion wrote: Syntax has been changed: -a indicates a *list* of attachment files ending with --. I don't recall which version

Re: what does this sender invalid error mean?

2010-08-03 Thread Chris G
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 02:10:36PM -0700, Michael Elkins wrote: On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 09:38:01PM +0100, Chris G wrote: I'm trying to b[ounce] a message and I'm getting the following error on the mutt status line:- SMTP session failed: 550 Sender chris@ invalid So what is it saying?

Re: what does this sender invalid error mean?

2010-08-03 Thread Erik Christiansen
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 01:01:28PM +0100, Chris G wrote: However I've just realised that I removed the record for chris.isbd.net from the zone file for isbd.net at my hosting provider, would the non-existence of chris.isbd.net break things? Given that chris.isbd.net now doesn't resolve for

Re: sending an email with a mutt one-line without being prompted

2010-08-03 Thread Bob Proulx
Grant Edwards wrote: Nicolas Williams wrote: Right. There's no good convention for end of list of arguments to an option. There's only a good convention for end of variable argument list ('--'), and since this is the closest thing... And since there _is_ a convention that '--' ends the

Re: sending email to txt

2010-08-03 Thread Tim Gray
On Aug 03, 2010 at 12:00 AM -0800, rog...@sdf.org wrote: Maybe the reason for your delay was your smtp relays? Might not have been your person relay, but another one in between (ie. Big city) Who knows. I just tried both addresses now and they both came right through.

Re: sending email to txt

2010-08-03 Thread Tim Gray
On Aug 03, 2010 at 12:00 AM -0800, rog...@sdf.org wrote: Maybe the reason for your delay was your smtp relays? Might not have been your person relay, but another one in between (ie. Big city) Sorry for the additional email. Forgot to add this: The mms address preserved my from email

Re: sending an email with a mutt one-line without being prompted

2010-08-03 Thread Nicolas Williams
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 10:36:05AM +0200, Christoph Kukulies wrote: -- has special meaning in some unix command lines to provide an escape when names starting with a --sign are concerned. (doesn't getopt use it as an escape anyway? not sure). mkdir -- -foo rmdir -- -foo -- means end of

Re: sending an email with a mutt one-line without being prompted

2010-08-03 Thread Nicolas Williams
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 02:00:46PM +, Grant Edwards wrote: On 2010-08-02, Nicolas Williams nicolas.willi...@oracle.com wrote: Right. There's no good convention for end of list of arguments to an option. There's only a good convention for end of variable argument list ('--'), and

Re: sending an email with a mutt one-line without being prompted

2010-08-03 Thread David Champion
* On 03 Aug 2010, Nicolas Williams wrote: On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 02:00:46PM +, Grant Edwards wrote: On 2010-08-02, Nicolas Williams nicolas.willi...@oracle.com wrote: Right. There's no good convention for end of list of arguments to an option. There's only a good convention for

Re: sending an email with a mutt one-line without being prompted

2010-08-03 Thread Nicolas Williams
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 12:45:12PM -0500, David Champion wrote: * On 03 Aug 2010, Nicolas Williams wrote: On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 02:00:46PM +, Grant Edwards wrote: On 2010-08-02, Nicolas Williams nicolas.willi...@oracle.com wrote: Right. There's no good convention for end of

Re: sending an email with a mutt one-line without being prompted

2010-08-03 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2010-08-03, Nicolas Williams nicolas.willi...@oracle.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 02:00:46PM +, Grant Edwards wrote: On 2010-08-02, Nicolas Williams nicolas.willi...@oracle.com wrote: Right. There's no good convention for end of list of arguments to an option. There's only a

Re: sending an email with a mutt one-line without being prompted

2010-08-03 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2010-08-03, David Champion d...@uchicago.edu wrote: * On 03 Aug 2010, Nicolas Williams wrote: On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 02:00:46PM +, Grant Edwards wrote: On 2010-08-02, Nicolas Williams nicolas.willi...@oracle.com wrote: Right. There's no good convention for end of list of

Re: sending an email with a mutt one-line without being prompted

2010-08-03 Thread David Champion
* On 03 Aug 2010, Grant Edwards wrote: Strictly speaking, no: since mutt requires the -a option to be last, a '--' terminating the list of arguments to -a implicitly terminates the option list as well. I think this may have been part of the design consideration. IMO, requiring that

Re: sending an email with a mutt one-line without being prompted

2010-08-03 Thread Will Fiveash
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 12:45:12PM -0500, David Champion wrote: * On 03 Aug 2010, Nicolas Williams wrote: On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 02:00:46PM +, Grant Edwards wrote: On 2010-08-02, Nicolas Williams nicolas.willi...@oracle.com wrote: Right. There's no good convention for end of