Re: Saving sent e-mails in INBOX for better threading?

On 30Mar2019 15:34, Erik Christiansen wrote: On 29.03.19 13:37, Max Görner wrote: thank you everyone for the valuable replies. I am a bit relieved to learn that others follow similar approaches. I will try to Bcc all e-mails to myself. That sounds a bit less hacky than saving sent e-mails in t

Re: Saving sent e-mails in INBOX for better threading?

On 30.03.19 09:37, Cameron Simpson wrote: > Aside: I sort new-to-top, the reverse of the default, because I like to see > the whole thread before replying. I found sorting conventionally got me > involved before I'd seen followon posts saying the same stuff I was saying. Hmmm ... that bears consid

Re: Saving sent e-mails in INBOX for better threading?

On 29.03.19 13:37, Max Görner wrote: > Dear list users, > > thank you everyone for the valuable replies. I am a bit relieved to learn that > others follow similar approaches. I will try to Bcc all e-mails to myself. > That sounds a bit less hacky than saving sent e-mails in the Inbox. Errr ... do

Re: github (was: [Fwd: Re: Impossible to connect to mail server via pops3 using mutt 1.11])

On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 09:07:24AM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote: Therefore if your want to submit code _to_ a project it helps a great deal to have an account with the hosting web service. If, as you do, you just need access to the repo you don't normally need an account; the usual VCS clone o

Re: Patch [was Re: [Fwd: Re: Impossible to connect to mail server via pops3 using mutt 1.11]

On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 07:57:49PM +0100, felixs wrote: OK, I managed to apply the patch as an email patchfile using git am /path/to/patch git log shows inclusion of the patch commit. git status says that my cloned repo is +1 ahead of MASTER-ORIGIN Just to follow up, I slightly modified the

Re: Saving sent e-mails in INBOX for better threading?

On 29Mar2019 18:21, Erik Christiansen wrote: On 28.03.19 13:24, Max Görner wrote: I am a very pleased Mutt user for several years now. However, I would love to have a threading similar to GMail, showing send and received messages in the same thread. I wonder whether one could just configure m

Re: Saving sent e-mails in INBOX for better threading?

On 28Mar2019 22:05, Gregor Zattler wrote: I send every email to me via Bcc: the incoming Bcc: copy is handled by the same procmail scripts as all email and therefore the email will go in the same folder(s). Admittedly I get duplicates this way, but I use procmail also as a duplicate filter an a

Re: github (was: [Fwd: Re: Impossible to connect to mail server via pops3 using mutt 1.11])

On 29Mar2019 13:05, felixs wrote: On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 08:42:33AM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote: On 28Mar2019 22:20, felixs wrote: > I tried to access the branch with the patch, but the access is > password-protected. Are you able to share the patchfile by other means? > Signing up with gitl

Re: github (was: [Fwd: Re: Impossible to connect to mail server via pops3 using mutt 1.11])

On 29Mar2019 14:17, derek martin wrote: On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 08:42:33AM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote: You can sign up to github without any other obligations; it is free and gets you various useful facilities. [...] There isn't actually any particular downside. Sure there is. It's yet a

Re: Patch [was Re: [Fwd: Re: Impossible to connect to mail server via pops3 using mutt 1.11]

Hi, felixs wrote: > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 03:11:34PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 10:20:54PM +0100, felixs wrote: >>> I tried to access the branch with the patch, but the access is >>> password-protected. >> >> The repo is clonable via

Re: github (was: [Fwd: Re: Impossible to connect to mail server via pops3 using mutt 1.11])

On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 08:42:33AM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote: > You can sign up to github without any other obligations; it is free > and gets you various useful facilities. [...] > There isn't actually any particular downside. Sure there is. It's yet another account to maintain/protect which

Re: Patch [was Re: [Fwd: Re: Impossible to connect to mail server via pops3 using mutt 1.11]

On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 08:57:36AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 12:48:46PM +0100, felixs wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 03:11:34PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > > > The repo is clonable via , > > > which you will find under t

Re: Patch [was Re: [Fwd: Re: Impossible to connect to mail server via pops3 using mutt 1.11]

On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 12:48:46PM +0100, felixs wrote: On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 03:11:34PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: The repo is clonable via , which you will find under the clone button on the project details page. Yes, I did that as a first operatio

Re: Saving sent e-mails in INBOX for better threading?

Dear list users, thank you everyone for the valuable replies. I am a bit relieved to learn that others follow similar approaches. I will try to Bcc all e-mails to myself. That sounds a bit less hacky than saving sent e-mails in the Inbox. Thank you for all the replies. Sincerely Max Görner

Re: github (was: [Fwd: Re: Impossible to connect to mail server via pops3 using mutt 1.11])

On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 08:42:33AM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote: > On 28Mar2019 22:20, felixs wrote: > > I tried to access the branch with the patch, but the access is > > password-protected. Are you able to share the patchfile by other means? > > Signing up with gitlab is another option, but I'd

Patch [was Re: [Fwd: Re: Impossible to connect to mail server via pops3 using mutt 1.11]

On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 03:11:34PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 10:20:54PM +0100, felixs wrote: > > I tried to access the branch with the patch, but the access is > > password-protected. > > The repo is clonable via , which you > wi

Re: github (was: [Fwd: Re: Impossible to connect to mail server via pops3 using mutt 1.11])

On 29Mar2019 08:42, Cameron Simpson wrote: On 28Mar2019 22:20, felixs wrote: I tried to access the branch with the patch, but the access is password-protected. Are you able to share the patchfile by other means? Signing up with gitlab is another option, but I'd need some more time to decide on

Re: Saving sent e-mails in INBOX for better threading?

On 28.03.19 13:24, Max Görner wrote: > Hello, > > I am a very pleased Mutt user for several years now. However, I would love to > have a threading similar to GMail, showing send and received messages in the > same thread. > > I wonder whether one could just configure mutt such as to save all send