Re: Professionnel mails not threaded

Check the headers for In-Reply-To and References. Your company's Email Software seems to be insufficient. However mutt might use a setting to group by subject.

Re: Is linewrap dead?

On 22-09-07 01:00, raf via Mutt-users wrote: On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 10:45:09PM -0400, Kurt Hackenberg > wrote: > > > I expect it is done in mutt because it must be done (for transport), > and it would be a mistake to assume that it will be done by the > editor, whatever editor it is. I

Re: Filter script to remove html, fullquotes and header lines

Am 2022-03-22 um 01:56 schrieb raf: On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 01:28:28PM +0100, Martin Trautmann wrote: Am 2022-03-21 um 12:56 schrieb raf: textmail can probably do at least some of what you want: https://raf.org/textmail https://github.com/raforg/textmail and it has some

Re: Filter script to remove html, fullquotes and header lines

Am 2022-03-21 um 12:56 schrieb raf: textmail can probably do at least some of what you want: https://raf.org/textmail https://github.com/raforg/textmail and it has some extensibility so you can supply external translation programs for the bits it doesn't do. it can operate on individual

Re: Filter script to remove html, fullquotes and header lines

Am 2022-03-20 um 22:46 schrieb Cameron Simpson: I think you'll have to write your own. I agree - but I hoped it could have been done with some fine tuning of an existing script. At minimum you need a full mail message parser so that you are not filtering, say, base64 or QP content

Filter script to remove html, fullquotes and header lines

Hi all, do you know about any mutt script that would go from message to message and 1) remove a html part if a plain text part is given 2) remove all trailing lines,    starting with a quote sign ">"    and at least e.g. 10 occurences   such as (^>[.*][\r\n]){9,} before the end of the message

Re: Creating HTML emails with mutt

On 19-11-01 11:37, martin f krafft wrote: > Regarding the following, written by “Stefan Hagen” on 2019-11-01 at > 08:53 Uhr +0100: > > While I was able to just write an email and send it, it is now a > process of carefully “coding” an email, previewing, correcting, > previewing,

Re: Creating HTML emails with mutt

On 19-10-29 18:09, Grant Edwards wrote: > Muttdown (a "sendmail" filter) which creates mutlipart alternative > html/text messages is the only reason I've been able to continue to > use mutt for the past 5-6 years. About 90% of the people to whom I > send email can't deal with plaintext only. The

Re: Bottom posting v top posting

Am 18. Mai 2018 00:13:56 MESZ schrieb Cameron Simpson : >On 17May2018 21:17, Florian Gamböck wrote: >>On 2018-05-17 13:15, Cameron Simpson wrote: >>>I've also seen replies come back from people unused to inline >response with >>>their reply slap in the middle of

Re: Bottom posting v top posting

Am 17. Mai 2018 10:06:04 MESZ schrieb Cameron Simpson <c...@cskk.id.au>: >On 17May2018 08:56, Martin Trautmann <tr...@gmx.de> wrote: >>Am 17. Mai 2018 02:01:42 MESZ schrieb Akkana Peck ><akk...@shallowsky.com>: >>>tech-lists writes: >>> You'd r

Re: Bottom posting v top posting

Am 17. Mai 2018 02:01:42 MESZ schrieb Akkana Peck : >tech-lists writes: > You'd really prefer to make >several separate related replies one right after the other on the >same topic, rather than one reply with all your comments? Absolutely yes! Anything else will destroy

Re: Bottom posting v top posting

Am 17. Mai 2018 05:15:33 MESZ schrieb Cameron Simpson : >I've also seen replies come back from people unused to inline response >with >their reply slap in the middle of the quoted text because they've not >added a >blank line. I don't know exactly what's happening at their

Re: Bottom posting v top posting

On 18-05-15 14:57, Stephan Seitz wrote: > Bottom posting is as bad as top posting. There isn’t much difference. I fully agree. Using fullquotes it does not matter very much whether you do it at top or bottom. Both is stupid for replies and even worse on mailing lists where everyone should know

Re: Bottom posting v top posting

On 18-05-15 14:37, tech-lists wrote: > On 13/05/2018 18:15, Martin Trautmann wrote: >> IBTD. Major e-mail tools, such as outlook, failed to support proper >> threading. Writing on a smartphone here, I'm not even aware of an app >> with threading. > > You're using K-

Re: Bottom posting v top posting

Am 14. Mai 2018 18:21:09 MESZ schrieb Ben Oliver : >This is a cool idea. I use K9 which has decent threading support. >Mainly >for reading rather than sending though. Could you send me a screenshot please? I also do use k9, but I only do see a grouping by subject. It lacks

Re: Bottom posting v top posting

Am 13. Mai 2018 17:12:14 MESZ schrieb tech-lists : >No!! ;) and you're missing the point (IMOHO) :( basically, people >quote back way too much. This is the issue. Most email apps allow >threaded mail, so very little need to quote whole screeds. IBTD. Major e-mail

print threads effectively

Hi all, what's your recommendation in order to have a neat, readable printout of a thread? It should - not contain irrelevant header lines ... can be done easily - not contain full quotes ... oops, this may be too much for mutt, to kill all those Outlook full quotes - not

Re: Fix References of Received Mails

On Tue 2000-11-21 (14:03), Martin Trautmann wrote: Here's an extra wish: + Tag the thread esc-tag + change the thread to read: ;wN How should this be done? At least, after figuring out the general availability both of 2.3.4. Miscellaneous Functions and 6.4 Functions I managed

Re: Fix References of Received Mails

-- resent On Thu 2000-11-16 (21:14), Martin Trautmann wrote: On Thu 2000-11-16 (18:10), Ulf Erikson wrote: I use a macro to do just this. except for the extra 'fixed' header, but you should be able to add that one easily. All the tricks are in formail and the fairly new edit command

Re: Fix References of Received Mails

-- resent On Tue 2000-11-21 (14:03), Martin Trautmann wrote: Here's an extra wish: + Tag the thread esc-tag

Re: Fix References of Received Mails

On Thu 2000-11-16 (21:14), Martin Trautmann wrote: On Thu 2000-11-16 (18:10), Ulf Erikson wrote: I use a macro to do just this. except for the extra 'fixed' header, but you should be able to add that one easily. All the tricks are in formail and the fairly new edit command, which lets

Fix References of Received Mails

Hi all, is there any chance to edit the headers of received mails semi-automatically? My wish is a macro to fix threading from other users with poor email software. A macro shall be called with the list number of the proper referred email. This will copy the message id from there and insert it

Re: Fix References of Received Mails

On Thu 2000-11-16 (16:07), Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: Martin Trautmann proclaimed on mutt-users that: is there any chance to edit the headers of received mails semi-automatically? procmail and formail are your friends. Thanks - this may be helpful to do it fully automatically

Re: Fix References of Received Mails

On Thu 2000-11-16 (18:10), Ulf Erikson wrote: I use a macro to do just this. except for the extra 'fixed' header, but you should be able to add that one easily. All the tricks are in formail and the fairly new edit command, which lets you edit the raw message. Not sure what version is