On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 18:23:11 -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
> If the mailbox is only accessed from one machine, why is it on an NFS
> server?
Because my home is on an NFS server. This is the main reason. But in
fact, I want to be able to access these mailboxes from other machines
too, for insta
Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is safer for incoming mailboxes. But for archive boxes, that are
> accessed from only one machine, it is useless. So, could the locking
> mechanism be chosen from the .muttrc?
If the mailbox is only accessed from one machine, why is it on an N
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 11:19:45 -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
> Mutt wants to use fcntl-locking on the file. This forces NFS to use a
> non-caching mode, where all I/O is transfered directly to/from the
> server, instead of being cached on the local system. This slows things
> down, but it is al
