Re: File locking (was: Mutt 1.1.9 about 3-4x slower than mutt 1.0)

[David DeSimone]

Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is safer for incoming mailboxes.  But for archive boxes, that are
> accessed from only one machine, it is useless.  So, could the locking
> mechanism be chosen from the .muttrc?

If the mailbox is only accessed from one machine, why is it on an NFS
server?  Just put the mailbox on the one machine that is going to access
it.  No more NFS slow-down.

-- 
David DeSimone   | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   |  that there is no man really clever who has not
Hewlett-Packard  |  found that he is stupid." -- Gilbert K. Chesterson
UX WTEC Engineer |    PGP: 5B 47 34 9F 3B 9A B0 0D  AB A6 15 F1 BB BE 8C 44