On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 07:53:36AM +0530, Prahlad Vaidyanathan wrote:
manual.txt coming with mutt ;-)
Well, that doesn't have anything on what scoring is, and why one would
use it, does it ? or do I have the abridged version ? ;-)
ah ... you're right. Isn't there something on the internet?
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 16:55:39 +0100
From: Cliff Sarginson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mutt Users' List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Negative scores and regexp questions
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 04:23:51PM +0100, Christian Ordig wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 06:00:36AM -0500, David T-G
Hi,
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001 Christian Ordig spewed into the ether:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 09:19:01PM +0530, Prahlad Vaidyanathan wrote:
Is anyone here an 'active scorer' ? Do point us mortals to some good
docs please ;-)
manual.txt coming with mutt ;-)
Well, that doesn't have anything on
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 08:22:04PM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 03:07:59AM +0100, Cliff Sarginson (dis)graced my inbox with:
I still feel very dumb on this.
Can someone explain to an idiot what the scoring is for
and how you use it.
The manual assumes you know.
Cliff, et al --
...and then Cliff Sarginson said...
%
% On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 08:22:04PM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
% On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 03:07:59AM +0100, Cliff Sarginson (dis)graced my inbox
with:
% I still feel very dumb on this.
% Can someone explain to an idiot what the
Thus spake Cliff Sarginson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
How is that better than other filtering techniques? What you say
sounds plausible, but is it the whole story ?
I don't use scoring, but you could do things a little more particular to
Mutt than just folder filtering, such as _marking_ for
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 04:23:51PM +0100, Christian Ordig wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 06:00:36AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
I'm in the same boat, in fact :-) What we really need is for active
scorers to reply!
ok. here I is one ...
If you tried to implement all of that, with those
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 04:55:39PM +0100, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
That's the point. Imagine someone you don't really care about.
snipped -- regretfully
Ok, that is a good explanation.
It still does sound a little complex (since you have been the only
active scorer to reply so far, it does
Hi,
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001 David T-G spewed into the ether:
[-- snip --]
I'm in the same boat, in fact :-) What we really need is for active
scorers to reply!
From what you say it seems like a real neat idea, but unfortunately I
haven't found any docs on it (Maybe I just haven't looked hard
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 09:19:01PM +0530, Prahlad Vaidyanathan wrote:
Is anyone here an 'active scorer' ? Do point us mortals to some good
docs please ;-)
manual.txt coming with mutt ;-)
--
Christian Ordig
Germany
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 06:43:04PM +0200, Stefan Frank wrote:
Does that mean, that I have to add a default score to all received
messages before I can delete them (or mark them read) by score?
yes, I think so.
add:
score ~A 5000
as your first scoring rule and everything should be fine (or 5
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 02:19:33AM +0100, Christian Ordig wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 06:43:04PM +0200, Stefan Frank wrote:
Does that mean, that I have to add a default score to all received
messages before I can delete them (or mark them read) by score?
yes, I think so.
add:
score
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 03:07:59AM +0100, Cliff Sarginson (dis)graced my inbox with:
I still feel very dumb on this.
Can someone explain to an idiot what the scoring is for
and how you use it.
The manual assumes you know.
I assume it is some kind of super-filtering technique.
I don't
Hello,
I have two problems with scores in mutt. Whenever the score of a message
is negative, %N in the index_format shows zero and the settings in
score_threshold_delete and score_threshold_read will never match.
Example 1:
score '~s foo' 10
score '~f [EMAIL PROTECTED]' -100
If the message
At Fri, Jun 29 2001 [09:31 -0400], Dan Boger aroused my curiosity with:
from the mutt manual:
3.20. Message Scoring
...
Negative final scores are rounded up to 0.
Oops, I haven't read this sentence - sorry.
Does that mean, that I have to add a default score to all received
15 matches
Mail list logo
