On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 09:34:03PM +0200, Roberto Suarez Soto wrote:
On 10/Sep/1999, Chris Green wrote:
What I need is to be able to view my POP3 'folder' and delete
individual messages. Most of the newer Unix/Linux MUAs do in fact
work this way with POP3 folders, it makes them look
On Sat, Sep 11, 1999 at 03:35:05AM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
What I need is to be able to view my POP3 'folder' and delete
individual messages. Most of the newer Unix/Linux MUAs do in fact
work this way with POP3 folders, it makes them look just like ordinary
local folders to the
Chris Green [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 09, 1999 at 06:10:10PM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
If you like Mutt so much, why not look instead at using another POP3
implementation (fetchmail) while still using Mutt? That's how it's
/supposed/ to work.
Fetchmail is equally
On Thu, Sep 09, 1999 at 06:10:10PM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
Chris Green [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
I have been using mutt on a number of different systems for quite a
long while (since something like version 0.7x I think). It has served
me well and has become steadily better. However
Chris Green:
What I need is to be able to view my POP3 'folder' and delete
individual messages. Most of the newer Unix/Linux MUAs do in fact
work this way with POP3 folders, it makes them look just like ordinary
local folders to the user. Using fetchmail with mutt can't do this at
all.
On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 01:23:00PM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
Chris Green:
What I need is to be able to view my POP3 'folder' and delete
individual messages. Most of the newer Unix/Linux MUAs do in fact
work this way with POP3 folders, it makes them look just like ordinary
Chris Green:
Is there a way of telling the MUA to delete a message locally (and not
download it again) but leave it on the server to be picked up by a
different machine later?
No, I don't think you could do this. Effectively what you have in
tkrat is what looks exactly like a local
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Chris Green wrote:
What I need is to be able to view my POP3 'folder' and delete
individual messages. Most of the newer Unix/Linux MUAs do in fact
work this way with POP3 folders, it makes them look just like ordinary
local folders to the user. Using fetchmail with
I have been using mutt on a number of different systems for quite a
long while (since something like version 0.7x I think). It has served
me well and has become steadily better. However I am now seriously
looking at other MUAs and one of the main reasons is mutt's minimal
POP3 support.
Let me
Chris Green:
So - what I am beginning to do is move over to a mail program which
has a good POP3 implementation (I'm pretty well settled on tkrat at
the moment though Mahogany shows promise). This allows me to set up
folders in my mail program which correspond to the POP3 mailboxes, I
can
On Thu, Sep 09, 1999 at 01:35:15PM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
If I receive an uninteresting message at one place and delete it, it
still gets downloaded at the other place and I have to delete it
again, which isn't ideal.
Quite, my method overcomes that problem.
I never leave much
Chris Green [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
I have been using mutt on a number of different systems for quite a
long while (since something like version 0.7x I think). It has served
me well and has become steadily better. However I am now seriously
looking at other MUAs and one of the main
12 matches
Mail list logo
